Every piece of DLC is great though. If you don't get them in the GOTY, and you end up liking Fallout 3, you'll end up paying more because Bethesda will do what it does and make the DLC more expensive combined than the GOTY.
So try not to like Fallout 3 if you do get vanilla. Although that's a difficult task.
But shouldn't DLC only be considered when you have completed the base game and want more?
I see countless of gamers buying a certain base game + DLC, and from the playtime alone I can just tell they aren't even bothered to complete (= story line + all side quests) the base game...
Since all DLC does - in most cases - is essentially add a bunch of side quests, it would be redundant to buy DLC when you don't even complete all side quests of the base game.
(Now not considering the DLC that add weapons/... from the start. That could be wisely bought from the start, if you are into that.)
Considering Fallout 3 is a huge game and takes probably around 100 hours to complete (= story line + all side quests): even if one would succeed in completing Fallout 3, more often than not, the person would be saturated with it by then.
--
Or should I change my point of view regarding DLC?
Feel free for anyone to express there thought process regarding DLC.