FF:Enhanced_Reality
Member
That's XBOX taking another slap then lol
HDMI 2.0 ONLY WTF
This mean you can't do 4k 120 HDR , only 4k 60 HDR and on top of that it's going to be 8bit instead of 10bit so colors will look like crap , this machine is a downgrade not an upgrade
"For those of you with high end displays we have a connection for you. It's called display port 1.4"
Which you can use with an hdmi 2.1 adapter.
There is absolutely zero reason for this not to have HDMI 2.1 specially that it's aimed for the living room and most of the tvs have HDMI 2.1 , now I understand it can still hit 4k 120 and do vrr but it's a downgrade when it comes to HDR , even PS5 and series x a 5 years old hardware have HDMI 2.1I don't think the Steam Machine is meant for power gamers who have the best hardware available and game at 4K120fps regularly. It's aimed more for someone like me, a PC gamer who has a five year old PC rocking a 3060Ti who games at 1080/1440 and 60fps. Its for someone who wants to plug it into their TV and play modest Steam games to relax with very little fuss, not play Cyberpunk or the very newest high end games in 4K120.
, even PS5 and series x a 5 years old hardware have HDMI 2.1
The reason would be tied to power consumption (minor concern here...but still valid given thermal management in a small chassis), licensing costs, and internal player specs collected by valve (knowing what hardware players are using and what settings they are using while playing).There is absolutely zero reason for this not to have HDMI 2.1 specially that it's aimed for the living room and most of the tvs have HDMI 2.1 , now I understand it can still hit 4k 120 and do vrr but it's a downgrade when it comes to HDR , even PS5 and series x a 5 years old hardware have HDMI 2.1
Pretty self-explanatory. Linux is not the OS you use for multiplayer gaming. If you want a PC console box for multiplayer get the next Xbox.
No way this is on par with base PS5
They are lucky though, because MS made the weak Series S and games still have to run on it for some time
No way this is on par with base PS5
They are lucky though, because MS made the weak Series S and games still have to run on it for some time
It has a more powerful CPU and a slightly less powerful GPU than the PS5. It closer to the PS5 than the XSS.
Yeah it's closer for sure, but not on par and you have keep in mind that PS5 has dedicated software, this runs generic PC software
This is absolutely correct and would be a large competitor to both MS (not getting their Windows license fee) and Sony (would be a true console competitor and could be marketed as such).Getting a little too ahead here. What Microsoft really does not want to happen is mainstream OEMs selling PCs with SteamOS pre-installed at a lower price than their Windows counterparts. The average person doesn't want any part of DIY installing an OS and will just stick with whatever is pre-installed.
Yeah, it's a shame if that's the experience you're looking for. It's the biggest downside of SteamOS/Linux.Hmm, that's a bit shit isn't it.
Sony is busy seeing Nintendo (Which doesn't threaten them at all) as a rival while they port everything to Steam to please Gabe Newell, without getting any of Valve's games like the upcoming Half Life 3 in return.Yup, and they're releasing their games on the rival's machine… lmao. Way to go, Sony.
DF dropped the Frame review now.
Yeah it's closer for sure, but not on par and you have keep in mind that PS5 has dedicated software, this runs generic PC software
Sure, its just a rough comparison, not 1:1. This thing is DOA if its over $499.99.