kiunchbb
www.dictionary.com
So how long until big publishers start botting the shit out of this system?
Honestly I don't think people should be able to tag a game without buying it.
So how long until big publishers start botting the shit out of this system?
Honestly I don't think people should be able to tag a game without buying it.
They're not reviews. Let the tags fly.
The holocoast never happened
They are pretty much useless in their current form. They are made to discover things, no leave passive agressive opinions or one note jokes.
I disagree. If a game has a certain quality, it'll get tagged with that legitimate tag enough that it'll pop up on a search.
The other tags are fun and hilarious.
FunnyTag said:The Holocoast Never Happened
Casual: Directs you to Dark Souls.
The system just came out. Let it equalize.
And you'll click on that game and buy it because of that tag? It also contains a "difficult" tag. If someone buys it because of a tag, they deserve to lose money. They've probably lost more money doing something more stupid and will continue to do so.
The system just came out. Let it equalize.
Yeah, and that tag might be inappropriate, but it'll probably just drop off as other tags get added.
Yeah, that is not how a service to buy stuff works. The guys from Valve are goin to get a good laugh before the tsunami phonecalls and mails from indies and big devs alike.
In all fairness, Guerrilla only had one good fun thing going for it.I immediately went to Red Faction Armageddon's tags and was not disappointed!
Tag: "Worse than Guerrilla"
So much truth, it brings a tear to my eye.
There's a very clear distinction between having inappropriate tags and simply tags from people who haven't purchased the game.
These are two separate things. One is needlessly restrictive. The other is simply maintaining oversight of a safe environment/community.
Tags should be moderated, but they should also be open to everyone.
Tags aren't meant to be sellers and they shouldn't be tailored to what the publisher/developer wants.
Having that restriction will probably help the moderation a lot more than moderate every tag list.
In anycase, at least we agree that after tonight, Valve will rethink the system (thats why is a beta, I guess)
Steam is still a store that needs to be diplomatic with both publishers and developers.
In all fairness, Guerrilla only had one good fun thing going for it.
Nah. Just have a report button and have it auto-delete certain terms. The manual pruning required would be minimal.
As it stands, the system is promising and looks to be a lot of fun. I'm eager to see how it evolves.
The report botton alone will stilll take some mod time. Auto delete will not delete everything, so you will be welcome by tags as "Gr0W Dick www.dsDs.@#"
God forbid. The Steam community is so above that.
Well, the mods will still need to delete it and waste time... when a buy restriction can make things easier.
Steam is a gigantic storefront and unless you are stubborn like EA, you will want to be there for the audience and to generate money during sales events.Steam is still a store that needs to be diplomatic with both publishers and developers.
I don't see the point of tags then. They're just a redundancy to reviews, as far as I'm concerned.
Valve even pretty much spells it out, if the community says it's shit, deal with it.
Yes, I feel like the greatest ease of use will be from that. Anyone who buys a game based on a tag deserves to waste their money away from that.tags are made for searching stuff with common terms. Reviews are made for look if the stuff is "decent ot good".
why can't we search for games on the store according to file size?
Someone in a current argument here gets some more fuel for his crusade when he see the first tag then reads the game's description and then puts the two into context...
Yes, I feel like the greatest ease of use will be from that. Anyone who buys a game based on a tag deserves to waste their money away from that.
Ugh, this shit is why PC gaming is scary to some people (amongst other reasons). To organize my games better, I need to research and download third party applications? Come on, Steam should have a much better way to organize/categorize my games at this point, it's like a decade old and it's laughably bad right now.
That's what I said, but apparently Valve has some arbitrary responsibility to keep user content about their business partners' games positive.
More like not wanting to waste resources or potential, like the ongoing problem of how make Greenlight work.
Someone in a current argument here gets some more fuel for his crusade when he see the first tag then reads the game's description and then puts the two into context...
I'm of the opinion that Greenlight is pretty much fine as it is right now.
.No offense dude, but I will not act condescending because someone takes offense of antisemitism.
FunnyTag said:The Holocoast Never Happened
And Valve will disagree with you.
I agree that Valve should not be QA tester for everysingle game. But Greenlight problems are also community related.
If the name "FunnyTag" (in the "Originally quoted by") in your previous post isn't condescending sarcasm, then I don't know what is.¿?
It came from tag of a picture you posted
LOL, the Batman games have a "Nanananananananananananana" tag
If the word "FunnyTag" (in the "Originally quoted by") in your previous post isn't condescending sarcasm, then I don't know what is.
I was the one who added the "play NFL Blitz instead" tag.