Arcade games tend to serve as a litmus test and quickly reveal a vast amount of game critics, including professionals, as utterly incompetent.
(And by "arcade" I'm not referring to "cheap and download-only", but ports of actual arcade games, and original games with designs that would suit actual arcade games.)
The typical awful review reveals that the reviewer never reached the
conscious incompetence level of skill, and was simultaneously incapable of writing a review of any substance and too lacking in self-awareness to recognize that. Otherwise even such a review could have value to a newcomer to the genre in a "first impression" sort of way, but the awful reviewers tend to fundamentally misunderstand the design so badly - e.g. spamming continues and then complaining the game has "short playtime and no replayability" - that they are absolutely misleading, the equivalent of a man trying to review a book without recognizing there are more pages after the first one.
I'm curious, what specific review are you talking about? I didn't spot a link.
From the few games I played before on a friend's account, DX is very unlike the original. I wouldn't have bought it otherwise since I find good ol' Pac-Man boring. A masterpiece in its time, sure, and possibly the best videogame made before I was born, but has been quickly eclipsed by much better games in the same way as
Wolfenstein 3D was.