Buckethead said:Purple coins need to die.
Take it from me: the game is truly fun. Just don't let these over-the-top lunatics ruin it for you by setting it up as something that it's not.Visualante said:That's great, that's an amazing thing. And I totally get that 64 nostalgia too..
But when it becomes vulgar, featuring grotesque and pseudo sexual imagery it ceases to be childlike. Anyway this has gone as far as it needs to. I eagerly anticipate the European release.
Visualante said:In reveal threads, sure. I don't often see it after the game is actually released.
Amir0x said:They should just remove all pretense of thematic unison from the next Mario and just call it "Super Mario Fucking Insanity", and every level should be a goddamn circus conveyor belt of crazy shit with platforms and dimensions and weird shit. One level he's in someone's stomach, the next he's in modern day New York, the next he's on fucking Pluto. Who the fuck knows! Everyone is the limit in "Super Mario Fucking Insanity!"
Andrex said:Eh, really? Peewee Piranha, Diggaleg, Bugaboom, Whomp King...
The boss rush galaxy was just really lazy. Would have prefered it not in the game at all.
HK-47 said:Diggaleg is nothing like Megaleg or any other boss.
Amir0x said:They should just remove all pretense of thematic unison from the next Mario and just call it "Super Mario Fucking Insanity", and every level should be a goddamn circus conveyor belt of crazy shit with platforms and dimensions and weird shit. One level he's in someone's stomach, the next he's in modern day New York, the next he's on fucking Pluto. Who the fuck knows! Everyone is the limit in "Super Mario Fucking Insanity!"
loosus said:What I'm saying is that you need to stop getting huffy either way. It's a game. Life will go on.
CcrooK said:Okay. So I haven't beat Galaxy 1 yet. Should I still get 2 and live the glory that all is saying?
eXistor said:What the heck will Nintendo do after this? Maybe a new franchise , because I can't see them making a new Mario that can top this.
Amir0x said:They should just remove all pretense of thematic unison from the next Mario and just call it "Super Mario Fucking Insanity", and every level should be a goddamn circus conveyor belt of crazy shit with platforms and dimensions and weird shit. One level he's in someone's stomach, the next he's in modern day New York, the next he's on fucking Pluto. Who the fuck knows! Everyone is the limit in "Super Mario Fucking Insanity!"
HK-47 said:As far as I am concerned they are extensions of each other.
I just don't know what they could do to top this that wouldn't still be considered a "Galaxy" game. There's no where to go now that he's gone into space!wRATH2x said:I wouldn't want Galaxy 3 to tell you the truth. I liked Galaxy well enough and I'm fucking loving the shit out of Galaxy 2, but its time to move on to new things.
And yeah I'm still bitter I never got my Super Mario 64-2(Say DS I dare you, I triple dare you motherfucker), even though I would love that I'd love to see where Nintendo takes 3D Mario next.
Nicktals said:But the lack of thematic unity and consistency in the mushroom kingdom is the reason why super mario galaxy 2 is a terrible game.
Changes in art style, time manipulation, momentum based platforming, light/dark world shifts. There is still tons of ideas you could fool around with.Jasoco said:I just don't know what they could do to top this that wouldn't still be considered a "Galaxy" game. There's no where to go now that he's gone into space!Again.
Also, Mario 64-2 on DS would suck. I still hate that Yoshi's Island's sequel was on the DS instead of a console, a 64 exclusively on the DS would suck. Also, Wind Waker's direct sequels are on the WRONG FUCKING CONSOLE, NINTENDO! Fuck the DS! I want a Celda on the motherfucking Wii! And so does everyone else. But nooooo. The Wii is reserved for realism-Zelda. Fuck realism. But I digress...
Nicktals said:But the lack of thematic unity and consistency in the mushroom kingdom is the reason why super mario galaxy 2 is a terrible game.
Amir0x said:They should just remove all pretense of thematic unison from the next Mario and just call it "Super Mario Fucking Insanity", and every level should be a goddamn circus conveyor belt of crazy shit with platforms and dimensions and weird shit. One level he's in someone's stomach, the next he's in modern day New York, the next he's on fucking Pluto. Who the fuck knows! Everyone is the limit in "Super Mario Fucking Insanity!"
Galaxy doesn't take place in the Mushroom Kingdom. It takes place in space.Nicktals said:But the lack of thematic unity and consistency in the mushroom kingdom is the reason why super mario galaxy 2 is a terrible game.
Isn't this the first Nintendo console since the SNES with more than one base Mario Game? And probably the first since NES with 3 Mario Games. I highly doubt we'll see another until Wii 2, or whatever comes next.Jasoco said:I just don't know what they could do to top this that wouldn't still be considered a "Galaxy" game. There's no where to go now that he's gone into space!Again.
Also, Mario 64-2 on DS would suck. I still hate that Yoshi's Island's sequel was on the DS instead of a console, a 64 exclusively on the DS would suck. Also, Wind Waker's direct sequels are on the WRONG FUCKING CONSOLE, NINTENDO! Fuck the DS! I want a Celda on the motherfucking Wii! And so does everyone else. But nooooo. The Wii is reserved for realism-Zelda. Fuck realism. But I digress...
Thats sort of the point...sgnhh said:Biggest criticism right now: they introduce comets a little too late for my liking. They started appearing around star 30, and with my play style (like to fully complete each galaxy in order), it means I'm now having to go back and revisit all the same old galaxies. The comets for the first two worlds basically showed up at the same time. Overload. Wish comets would've been available around star 5 or 10.
so you would say galaxy 2 expands upon galaxy 1, and places that expansion into pack formAndrex said:I feel Galaxy 1 was the base and 2 is the extension.
HK-47 said:Thats sort of the point...
EmCeeGramr said:so you would say galaxy 2 expands upon galaxy 1, and places that expansion into pack form
UltimateIke said:I finally made it to Throwback Galaxy after seeing everyone mention it. I knew it was a remake, but I didn't know what level it was.
I'm disappointed with which level they chose. I know why they picked the one they did, but I wanted more.(it matches the "small area floating in midair" style of all the galaxies)I wanted Bob-omb Battlefield.
cory said:I found the flying levels kind of easy, though I'll have to go back and get the comet coins in them cause I wasn't focused on items at all.
I'm not a fan of time limit based stars.
Super Mario Galaxy: The Lost Levels?EmCeeGramr said:so you would say galaxy 2 expands upon galaxy 1, and places that expansion into pack form
Nicktals said:But the lack of thematic unity and consistency in the mushroom kingdom is the reason why super mario galaxy 2 is a terrible game.
FTWer said:Meh, the complete lack of difficulty that makes it a little kids game is the reason for me.
Pretty colors & shiny graphics don't do it for me when everything is as easy as a tutorial.