Fellow neighbours, I'm gonna create a Denmark-GAF thread but can somebody help me out as to what to name the thread while I find out how to do the OP?
Your neighbors has a thread now as well:
Denmark-GAF
I were in Malmö, Sweden earlier in the week and I still quite like it there. Right now my thoughts are on either moving into an apartment here in Copenhagen, Denmark or moving to Sweden for some time.
Migrän.
Slut på skithuspapper.
Solen har gått i moln.
Internet är segt.
Kill me now.
Sigh.
Skulle vara asfett att ha en atombomb på bakgården. Då skulle jag bryta mig loss från Sverige och bilda mitt eget totalitära land.
En 31-årig man i Ängelholm försökte bygga en kärnreaktor hemma i sin lägenhet.
Experimentet avbröts när poliser och experter stormade lägenheten.
Jag har alltid varit intresserad av kärnfysik och partikelfysik. Jag har läst mycket böcker om det och ville se om det gick, säger mannen till Helsingborgs Dagblad.
På tal som skepp som smugglar. Minns ni det ryska fartyget som blev kapat utanför Öland?
Ryssarna lyckades väl storma det någonstans utanför afrikas kust eller var det nu var.
Fick man någonsin veta vad fartyget fraktade?
Minns spekulationer om att det var radioaktivt material redan då.
Var detta du?
http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/forsokte-tillverka-karnreaktor-i-lagenheten_6362774.svd
Fartyget kapades på Östersjön den 24 juli 2009 på färd mot Algeriet, och som återfanns vid Kap Verde den 17 augusti 2009. Vid kapningstillfället bar fartyget en last av 6 700 kubikmeter sågat virke till ett värde av 1,3 miljoner euro, lastat 20 till 22 juli i Alholmen vid Jakobstad, Finland.[1] Kapningen fick stor uppmärksamhet eftersom sjöröveri på Östersjön är ytterst ovanligt, särskilt kapningar av hela fartyg. Det finns flera rena rykten om fartygets last, såsom kärnvapen eller droger, vilka är helt obekräftade ännu[2]. Tidningen The Sunday Times skrev att den hemliga lasten bestod av missiler till luftförsvarssystemet S-300[3].
According to a widely circulated theory, the ship was transporting anti-aircraft weapons and cruise missiles destined for Iran, and the "hijackers" were hired from gangsters by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad to prevent the cargo from reaching its destination.[49][50] Referring to an earlier article in Russia's Komsomolskaya Pravda, The Independent reported that an unnamed general in the Russian Navy spoke of his suspicion that Russian organized crime was illegally shipping S-300 or Kh-55 missiles to Iran.[51] A variation of the story suggested that the Russian government itself had staged the hijacking of the ship once it learned about an unsanctioned missile delivery to the Middle East.[52] Specifically, Mossad was reported to have been tracking the shipment,[12] and, as BBC News reported, informed Russian authorities that the ship was transporting a "Russian air defence system for Iran."[53] The S-300 missiles allegedly were loaded on board when the ship stopped in Kaliningrad.[52][54]
It depends on who you ask. There was a recent good article in The Economist that describe our current model. Social mobility is better than in most places since we offer free education even at university level. The average wage is high, but I'm not sure how well it compares to other countries if you factor in the relative value. If you listen to the media then poverty is very common in Sweden. However, even our poor have a roof over their heads, food on their plates and access to free education and healthcare.People always refer to Scandinavia as a place where elements on Capitalism and Socialism work. Where social mobility is incredibly easy, average wages are high, and poverty (in comparison to other industrialized nations) hardly exists. Is this true?
It depends on who you ask. There was a recent good article in The Economist
I think it was mostly jorma who hated it. He's a leftist and I don't think you'll find him agreeing with most of the current government's policies.
People always refer to Scandinavia as a place where elements on Capitalism and Socialism work. Where social mobility is incredibly easy, average wages are high, and poverty (in comparison to other industrialized nations) hardly exists. Is this true?
It used to be fairly true, but the last decade and a half has been plauged by right wing governments that privatise the shit out of everything for ideological reasons, rather than pragmatical reasons, and sold public assets to private enterprise for peanuts.
They are beggaring us all, and what used to be a perfectly fine Gini coefficient will soar along with it, i'm sure.
Good question about deregulation, you could argue that empirics show that private organizations are far more efficient and that results might not show in the short term. I'm kind questioning why you think corruption would be more likely in the private sphere compared to the public, seems to me that most corruption has happened in governmental organization. (although I still believe that Sweden arguably handles corruption better than any other country, except maybe our closest peers).Truth.
Why did they deregulate the vehicle inspection market? It was already the most effective in the world. The results are showing now, slowly but surely the prices for an inspection is going up. Next in line is probably corruption.
Is it morally defensible for the government to own an alcohol making company?Why was Vin&Sprit sold? Why cant the state (aka. we) own companies? After all it brings in cash for the good of us all. No, now it is french!
Probably not any time soon.When will the über profitable LKAB be sold?
You can thank Göran P. for the schools. I'll defend the right for private/free schools to exist as long as we have our incredibly shitty system in place. A vast majority of public schools are just dogshit.Not to talk about schools, care giving, shuffling public money into the pockets of a few people.
Recently there was a scandal, I cant remember where but a public owned company was sold for a very-very low and shitty price. I got depressed and never read the whole thing, it wouldn't surprise me if some politicians brother in law profited from it. When Sweden ranks low (as in "good" ) on the "global corruption list" that comes out every year I always smile.
Et.c. et.c.
If your public schools are dogshit the solution isn't to privatize them but fix them within. I find it odd that you neighbor nations with the best school systems in the world in which nearly all of their schools are public. Most notably Finland who has taken a radical approach that is far and away from Sweden's model.
Well, that's thanks to Göran Persson's project to shift the responsibility of schools to municipalities from the state.
Good question about deregulation, you could argue that empirics show that private organizations are far more efficient and that results might not show in the short term. I'm kind questioning why you think corruption would be more likely in the private sphere compared to the public, seems to me that most corruption has happened in governmental organization. (although I still believe that Sweden arguably handles corruption better than any other country, except maybe our closest peers).
Is it morally defensible for the government to own an alcohol making company?
Fick en faktura från radiotjänsten idag, följd från att det var en gubbe och hälsa på för några veckor sen. Står i alla fall att jag ska betala men har lite frågor om det. Har en tv enbart till ps3an som han inte såg vilken jag inte har kanaler på. Däremot såg han min datorskärm och noterade det. Dessutom är jag inte skriven här utan fortfarande hos mina päron, och har hört att det kanske ska gå under det dom betalar då. Tror ni jag kan slippa undan skiten? Hade jag använt tv:n hade jag gladligen betalat men va fan. Tänkte ringa radiotjänsten imorgon och snacka lite men vill höra lite åsikter också.
men jag misstänker att det är tänkt att alla som kan nå SVT Play ska pröjsa.
Varför inte betala som de flesta andra? Jag använder inte heller min TV förutom till TV-spel och enstaka Blu-ray filmer, men det innebär inte att det är okej att låta andra skattebetalare betala mina avgifter.
Den gamla regeln var att alla som hade en en produkt med kanalväljare skulle betala. Jag har inte läst igenom de nya bestämmelserna, men jag misstänker att det är tänkt att alla som kan nå SVT Play ska pröjsa.
Råkade ut för samma sak för ett par år sen och såvitt jag vet ska man betala tvavgift även om du bara har en tv som datorskärm t.ex och aldrig använt eller tänkt använda den för att se "tv" på.
M.a.o såg han att du hade tv är det bara att pröjsa.
I'm pro-private enterprise more often than not, but I definitely agree that there are certain circumstances where it's not ideal (water is probably the best example!).Things that need constant product development will probably be better off as private enterprise. But let's not kid ourselves, when they say "efficiency", they mean "profitability", and how do they do that? They raise prices, they sack workers and expect the people who are left to make good. Or even move entire workforces abroad. Yay, a slimmer, vastly more profitable corporation arises! But has Swedish society benefited? I mean the point of privatising was to make it beneficial for Swedish society in general, surely? Not just for the capitalist class that will move the money they make to tax havens in the British Virgin Islands?
And another thing - a lot of these privatisations is just granting a monopoly to a private company instead of a state owned company. Things like the subway, electricity (omg Fortum, probably the worst fucking deal ever Those finns must still be laughing at us), internet infrastructure. Things like that. If there is to be a monopoly it's probably better of in the hands of the State.
Look, i'm not anti private enterprise, but some things just should have remained where they were. Things that we consider life essentials are nearly always better off state run.
I don't see why not. I think they should own a medical marijuana growing facility as well. But that's just me
I'm kind questioning why you think corruption would be more likely in the private sphere compared to the public, seems to me that most corruption has happened in governmental organization. (although I still believe that Sweden arguably handles corruption better than any other country, except maybe our closest peers).
Is it morally defensible for the government to own an alcohol making company?
Probably not any time soon.
You can thank Göran P. for the schools. I'll defend the right for private/free schools to exist as long as we have our incredibly shitty system in place. A vast majority of public schools are just dogshit.
Probably the selling of health care service providers to the workers? Or schools being privatized and sold to the management and teachers?
I think you smile because you don't realize the extent of corruption in other countries