T
thepotatoman
Unconfirmed Member
I don't get the "equal opportunity offender" defense at all. Are there really an equal number of jokes about straight white males being stereotypical straight white males? What type of jokes could even made like that which actually seems to take aim at the race, gender, and sexual orientation itself, instead of just the character itself, in the same way a lot of these jokes take aim at the race, gender, and sexual orientation of minorities?
White, straight and male is simply the default where basically no assumptions are made about you just from those two characteristics.
I'm a white male, so I never see myself in a situation where I could even be stereotyped for my race or gender. So when they make fun a hillbilly, it's not like I'd ever be able to see myself as being attacked because I'd never once be mistaken for a hillbilly. I'd have to prove my hillbilly-ness first before people start stereotyping me like that. I might be get equal oportunity hit when I'm stereotyped as a nerd, but that's only after they somehow learn that I'm a nerd. My race and gender has nothing to do with that.
So I guess I don't see how you can hit all races equally when it's practically impossible to actually hit white as a race. I suppose there's always the white men can't dance or jump stereotype, but there's no way to take that as far as these character defining stereotypes that is often put on minorities.
It's seen as outrage, and people are bring up their black/gay friends, because they don't see the grey areas of racism or homophobia. It makes sense to think "stupid racist humor" is read as absolute outrage when you interpret that as being accused of hating black people, instead of simply accusing something of feeding into counterproductive stereotypes.
It's true, you're not really accomplishing anything with your comedy if no one is pissed off at you. But what are these anti-PC comedians trying to accomplish? The ability to discuss topics that the public doesn't want to discuss, or the right to make fun of historically downtrodden groups as much as they want?
White, straight and male is simply the default where basically no assumptions are made about you just from those two characteristics.
I'm a white male, so I never see myself in a situation where I could even be stereotyped for my race or gender. So when they make fun a hillbilly, it's not like I'd ever be able to see myself as being attacked because I'd never once be mistaken for a hillbilly. I'd have to prove my hillbilly-ness first before people start stereotyping me like that. I might be get equal oportunity hit when I'm stereotyped as a nerd, but that's only after they somehow learn that I'm a nerd. My race and gender has nothing to do with that.
So I guess I don't see how you can hit all races equally when it's practically impossible to actually hit white as a race. I suppose there's always the white men can't dance or jump stereotype, but there's no way to take that as far as these character defining stereotypes that is often put on minorities.
omg is this the new 'I have gay friends!' Just because you got drunk at a pride parade and maybe changed your profile pic to rainbow doesn't mean you can't have homophobic or transphobic tendencies.
"Movie X is stupid humor" isn't outrage. Changing that statement to "Movie X is stupid racist humor"? Still not outrage. Criticism of those statements as "outrage" at best completely misrepresenting the scope to make your argument easier.
It's seen as outrage, and people are bring up their black/gay friends, because they don't see the grey areas of racism or homophobia. It makes sense to think "stupid racist humor" is read as absolute outrage when you interpret that as being accused of hating black people, instead of simply accusing something of feeding into counterproductive stereotypes.
George Carlin said:I think it's the duty of the comedian to find where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
It's true, you're not really accomplishing anything with your comedy if no one is pissed off at you. But what are these anti-PC comedians trying to accomplish? The ability to discuss topics that the public doesn't want to discuss, or the right to make fun of historically downtrodden groups as much as they want?