Thank God. YEC is reserved for good players.Sabine Lisicki isn't there.
No one is beating Roger in Basel. The bigger problem is going to be Paris and London, especially since he won't get any rest this year.
Thank God. YEC is reserved for good players.Sabine Lisicki isn't there.
Thank God. YEC is reserved for good players.
No one is beating Roger in Basel. The bigger problem is going to be Paris and London, especially since he won't get any rest this year.
Well I don't feel sorry for him in that way. What I meant is that playing 15 or so matches in 3 weeks is very taxing and towards the end of that period he might run out of steam (or maybe in Paris already). Last year he had a week of break between Paris and the ATP finals, so it was easier to manage.He gets all of December off just like every other ATP player. If he's doing an exhibition match, it's not like he has to prepare for that.
I'm not sure I agree. If a player like Azarenka was 10 years younger, she probable would have had a successful career anyway. I can imagine she would plow through in early rounds against players like Dementieva, Myskina etc. (basically those who were ranked #4-10 in the last decade) and occasionally win against Henin or Serena in a big final.Just wanted to drop in here to say I'm a huge tennis fan, although my love of professional tennis (mostly WTA) has dropped significantly. I remember going to matches/watching on TV players like Steffi Graf, Monica Seles, Martina Hingis (especially), the Williams sisters, Davenport, the Belgians etc. A lot of great players in the late 1990s/early 2000s. To say that Azarenka, Sharapova, etc. are much worse players would be a vast understatement. The women's tour has really been going through a lull these last few years in my opinion; it's Serena Williams and the seven dwarfs, who all play the same way. To think that a limited player like Sharapova has now won all 4 Slams -- blows my mind! On the other hand, men's tennis has probably never been better. </rant>
Well I don't feel sorry for him in that way. What I meant is that playing 15 or so matches in 3 weeks is very taxing and towards the end of that period he might run out of steam (or maybe in Paris already). Last year he had a week of break between Paris and the ATP finals, so it was easier to manage.
I'm not sure I agree. If a player like Azarenka was 10 years younger, she probable would have had a successful career anyway. I can imagine she would plow through in early rounds against players like Dementieva, Myskina etc. (basically those who were ranked #4-10 in the last decade) and occasionally win against Henin or Serena in a big final.
But what hurts women's tennis the most is that the courts are slowed down so that players like Isner or Raonic don't dominate men's game - there was no need to slow women's game, yet it happened because they share courts with men and tactical depth and variety have been eliminated in favor of baseline grinding. Someone like Tsonga is explosive enough to be successful with his net approaches despite the slowed down courts, but no woman can obviously play like Tsonga.
1930's radio technology there in Switzerland eh?
Actually men's game has all the same problems that are at the moment hidden by the amazing Fed-Rafa-Djoker-Muzzah rivalry. Take it away and you have WTA2. Dearth of young talent (it's far worse on ATP actually) - it's amazing that Tommy Haas is able to hit top 20 at 34, but what does it say about players who should be in their prime in mid 20s that they allow a player in mid 30s to reach such a high ranking? Men's game also relies mostly on baseline grinding. Tournaments like Shanghai with low and fast bounce and you see a lot of variety there are an exception, not a rule.I think the problem is a lack of prodigious talents. Graf, Seles, Hingis, Venus, Serena -- champions at 16 or 17. This is increasingly rare, and I think a lot of it has to do with the homogeneous coaching style for kids. Everyone models their game after the "Nick Bolliteri"-style of play -- hit hard, two-handed backhands, from the baseline. So all the girls are now playing a very similar style of tennis, so it makes sense that the best athlete (in this case Serena Williams) is totally dominant over the rest of them. Just look at her h2h over Sharapova and Azarenka, complete ownage. Different styles of play are being discouraged and that's a bad thing. This issue does not exist in the men's game.
What's your beef manMan can't even watch tennis since the us open. So disgusting that Murray won.
Absolutely incredible. The best women's match I've seen all year.Great match between Azarenka and Kerber.
Man can't even watch tennis since the us open. So disgusting that Murray won.
Wow, Serena is probably double as big nowadays.If only Legend was still around
If only Legend was still around
Nadal said:It's disappointing for me to miss the last two tournaments of the season in Paris and London, but it doesn't come as a surprise. I will hopefully resume my tennis practice soon since I am making good progress with my recovery from injury. I am not ready to compete at the highest level in time for these events so I will continue my recovery in Mallorca and work hard to be back as soon as possible.
Well she did make a (somewhat) brief comebackIf only Legend was still around
If he ever returns I wonder what his play will be like
He will return at the beginning of next season once he can cycle properly. He will limp in between points but bounce around like the Energizer Bunny all the whole yelling vamos after his opponent makes an unforced error off a moon ball.If he ever returns I wonder what his play will be like
Istanbul is being a fabulous host for the WTA year-end champs! Packed stands, INDOOR YES MY BELOVED INDOORS and this year with matches delivering. Lots of great long, classic matches. Maria always delivering when playing indoors as well, although if she beats Vika we'll prob get another Serena-Masha classic :b
Well Maria plays better on slow surfaces now. But indoors no matter the surface means no wind and other nasty things.
I just don't want another beatdown against Lordrena. At least make it competitive Pova.
Yeah this has to be the slowest indoor court this year.How is it your beloved indoors when the surface is one of the slowest this year? Unless you love slow ass courts, but traditionally indoors tournaments have been very fast.
I present you guys the most inaccurate/hilarious Tennis Headline Ever.
Williams and Sharapova: power vs. grace
Sharapova is basically a vastly inferior version of Serena in all areas. She never had any grace.I present you guys the most inaccurate/hilarious Tennis Headline Ever.
Williams and Sharapova: power vs. grace
So you like a surface only because a player you like happens to be good on it? That's completely backwards.Well Maria plays better on slow surfaces now. But indoors no matter the surface means no wind and other nasty things.
Especially since Serena can display an amazing variety when needed. Sharapova never switches things up, it's always baseline ballbashing for better or for worse.Sharapova is basically a vastly inferior version of Serena in all areas. She never had any grace.
We could bet on how many games Sharapova will win tomorrow, my guess is 5 and that's me being generous.
So you like a surface only because a player you like happens to be good on it? That's completely backwards.
Sharapova is basically a vastly inferior version of Serena in all areas. She never had any grace.
Did they change it? I'm on my phone now and it reads "A Fitting Finale."I present you guys the most inaccurate/hilarious Tennis Headline Ever.
Williams and Sharapova: power vs. grace
So you like a surface only because a player you like happens to be good on it? That's completely backwards.
Especially since Serena can display an amazing variety when needed. Sharapova never switches things up, it's always baseline ballbashing for better or for worse.
We might disagree about aesthetics but the bolded is just a lie.I like indoors because the matches are always fair. That Maria is better on them is a bonus for someone who watches most of her matches, not sure why that is hard to understand.
It's not ballbashing, when she's on it's always about sick angles and precision deep on the court, and agressively moving forward towards the net to finish it off. No, she doesn't switch it up in terms of going to other play styles but her success has been precisely that she doesn't ball bash wildly like some others on the tour who have enormous damage potential but haven't managed to string together enough lucky matches to get a slam. In the peak periods of her career, yes I'd say the tennis is beautiful, laser-like tennis.
I like indoors because the matches are always fair. That Maria is better on them is a bonus for someone who watches most of her matches, not sure why that is hard to understand.
It's not ballbashing, when she's on it's always about sick angles and precision deep on the court, and agressively moving forward towards the net to finish it off. No, she doesn't switch it up in terms of going to other play styles but her success has been precisely that she doesn't ball bash wildly like some others on the tour who have enormous damage potential but haven't managed to string together enough lucky matches to get a slam. In the peak periods of her career, yes I'd say the tennis is beautiful, laser-like tennis.
Doesn't mean she'll have a chance against Serena tomorrow, but that's a different game. She has not ever, post-surgery, played as well as in 2008. Getting important wins against Vika, whom she def always should beat, still feels good.
We might disagree about aesthetics but the bolded is just a lie.
haha, what? They're slightly different players, but in terms of quality they're about the same. Ridiculous to say Maria should always beat Vika.
That's what every player after when they get a loopy ball into the service box. That's completely different from "aggressively moving forward towards the net". That could describe Tsonga's game, or Federer's game on fast courts, or on women's tour maybe Vinci's, but absolutely not Sharapova's. I mean in the Sharapova-Radwanska match, Radwanska was by default 2 meters behind the baseline and Sharapova was still glued to the baseline even though she could try to approach the net in nearly every rally.What? I didn't say _at_ the net I said moving towards the net. Whenever she's confident enough and moves forward she closes a high percentage of points on drive or swing volleys. Moving forward to kill a ball is something she's mentioned several times as a key to success, not the least when she's been lacking or lost a match.
She gets to hit them more often because she gets more defensive loopy balls. But that doesn't mean "when she's on it's always about aggressively moving forward towards the net" which is as far from truth as one may get.Well she said that after the reporter acknowledged their presence in her game and increased use in this the most successful year after her comeback. Sharapova is known for her drive volleys, that's common knowledge.