• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Terrorist attack in London [up: 6 people killed, ~50 injured, 3 attackers dead]

Belker

Member
Their jihadists believe they are spiritually commanded to butcher unbelievers..

These attacks won't just stop. Doing nothing won't help. ISIS won't give up if we sit tight. There is no reason to say that 'living normally' somehow switches off the theological magnets powering salafist jihadism.

THis pretty much what Sam Harris read aloud from the publication I mentioned earlier. There are all sorts of different contexts and ideas through which we understand the world. We apply our thinking to other people's actions, which is how we try to understand them.


But, I heard a quote recently, which apparenlty is from Maya Angelou: "When people show you who they are, believe them".
 

Bobnob

Member
If my parents could live in London during the IRA terrorism of the 80's and 90's, I can continue to live in London during this period of radical Islamist terrorism. Keep calm and carry on indeed.
Good for you pal, me personally am worried about letting my child travel to london or any city on a school trip for eg.
Not knowing the threats the randomness of it is disturbing.
 

Yamauchi

Banned
the regressive left do
You're wrong. Regressive leftists do not say they love ISIS. Regressive leftists defend elements of society that actively seek the destruction of Western civilization. An example would be the accolades directed toward Manchester's 'modern, moderate' Didsbury mosque by regressive leftists, which, it turns out, was 'unofficially' distributing pamphlets that roundly denounced Western ethics and integration into British society by immigrant Muslims. The modern, moderate Muslim mosque was actually prepping the soil for the seeds of radical Saudi Wahhabism, which was the ideology of the Manchester bomber.

Regressive leftists are not inherently evil -- they are actually just so stupid and so brainwashed by their own ideology that they believe that defending fundamentalist Muslims (hijabs, long beards, pants above the ankle) is an aspect of multiculturalism and therefore must be upheld at all costs. It's ultimately a self-correcting problem. Their granddaughters will either be wearing the veil, living under the rule of sheikhs and emirs, or they will emigrate to the United States, Australia, and New Zealand.
 

Tahnit

Banned
Killing innocent civilians is wrong in Wahhabism too. They do technically allow for death via collateral damage - unintentional killings like the majority of Western countries.

Isis don't really need hadiths or mainstream Islamic scholars, they use the above and say you can kill everyone not on Isis side as an enemy combatant. Babies or anybody.

then they are litterally insane and empty of empathy. Nuke them all till they glow. Sick of this shit. Those poor people
 

Breakage

Member
All the people say keep calm carry on, its hard man and im not sure how people can't be affected by this.

They want people to become desensitized to attacks like this so that it is downplayed and/or interpreted in the same way accidents are. Even London's mayor has said something along the lines of terrorism is part and parcel of living in a city. I think it does affect people and you end up really seeing its true effect reflected in voting trends and attitudes towards Muslims and Islam. If these kinds of currently rare attacks become a regular feature of London life, it will only become harder for a normal person to find comfort in the old familiar death by car accidents, bee stings, etc. comparisions.

Police now infoming people to run, hide and tell in an event of a terror attack. As a Londoner I don't think it is irrational to be worried about what is going on despite how "rare" terror attacks may be.
 

TTOOLL

Member
This is equally naive. Doing nothing and carrying on as normal won't stop the attacks. People in London carried on as normal after the last Westminster attack and yet here we are again. Terror planners don't sit there and think, oh, #WeAreNotAfraid is trending, so I guess we might as well cancel our attacks. Nobody blows up schoolgirls at a concert because they think it will somehow lure the West into a trap of 'reacting' and doing some vaguely racist things to Muslims - I mean, they may hope for this outcome as a secondary objective, but ultimately do it simply because they hate and despise Western society and civilisation, and really so believe that God commands them to the righteous duty of killing the unbelievers, and that paradise awaits this holy work.

You can't understand the phenomenon of Islamic terrorism if you try and sterilise discussion by pretending it's some kind of passing fad that will fade if the West ignores it and turns the other cheek. There is no evidence that Salafism/Wahhabism is terminally exhausted as an ideology/theology; you can't say that it will fade away if the West stoically refuses to react to it. This strain of Islam has been developing for decades and it's not going anywhere.

The notion that Islamic fundamentalists are simply trying to 'sow division among communities' is far too simplistic. This misapplies Western secular thinking to a deeply religious community. ISIS is deeply committed to an extremely conservative theology. Their jihadists believe they are spiritually commanded to butcher unbelievers and punish the crusader states. They will keep attacking for as long as they, and their interpretations of Islam, persist. How the unbelievers react is of secondary importance only. If we sit here and do nothing, it makes very little difference to them - they don't define success as 'increasing racism in Britain', they define it as 'slaughtering the kuffar'. They are content to keep on killing us because that's what God instructs them to do.

These attacks won't just stop. Doing nothing won't help. ISIS won't give up if we sit tight. There is no reason to say that 'living normally' somehow switches off the theological magnets powering salafist jihadism. This is naive denialism.


It won't get better until Western authorities start taking a smarter approach to integration and religion.


That's a very good post. Something must be done. It won't end by itself. No matter how hard some people want it to.
 

Moosichu

Member
Tell that to the parent of the girl who these guys stabbed 15 times just because she was there.

Don't you dare bring grieving parents into a discussion like this. If you think torture is right, argue for the merits you perceive it has. But don't use the grief of people to twist a political agenda like that.
 

Realyn

Member
Tell that to the parent of the girl who these guys stabbed 15 times just because she was there.

Considering that you could make that argument for what 90% of >20 year sentences that aren't related to economic crime it's maybe time for you to look for a new country with a different kind of government type.
 

CoolOff

Member
If my parents could live in London during the IRA terrorism of the 80's and 90's, I can continue to live in London during this period of radical Islamist terrorism. Keep calm and carry on indeed.

IRA often actively warned beforehand so civilians could get out of harms way. This is different. You can't just count "number of incidents" and say that the situations are the same.
 
Urgh, not really, nor is linking it allowed as far as I know, anyway - even with a very personal vendetta aside I'd wait to see how other news outlets report this before resorting to them.

Pretty much. At best they're a barometer for how bad/tasteless the reporting will get. So far it seems they're just going for the sensationalised drama angle.

Also:
LAMA5GG.jpg


Speaking of, any luck getting through to your friends?
 

smurfx

get some go again
That's what we shouldn't be saying in my opinion. It's been happening a lot but it just can't be seen as normal as the London mayor unfortunately said.

The problem is, how do you shut down the idea?

One user gave the idea of closing mosques that spread hate speech. But how would you do it legally?
kinda hard to stop people running over people with cars. you can kind of do some things to stop gun violence if your elected officials truly give a crap but not much can be done about cars. they can put up barriers in places with high amounts of foot traffic but there will always be opportunities to strike at other areas. after all you can't put up barriers everywhere in the city. before many of these terrorists tried to obtain explosives and guns and this is how they were caught. now they can radicalize somebody and just tell them to get on a car and gun it for as many people as possible. is it the new normal? maybe.
 

Game-Biz

Member
This is equally naive. Doing nothing and carrying on as normal won't stop the attacks. People in London carried on as normal after the last Westminster attack and yet here we are again. Terror planners don't sit there and think, oh, #WeAreNotAfraid is trending, so I guess we might as well cancel our attacks. Nobody blows up schoolgirls at a concert because they think it will somehow lure the West into a trap of 'reacting' and doing some vaguely racist things to Muslims - I mean, they may hope for this outcome as a secondary objective, but ultimately do it simply because they hate and despise Western society and civilisation, and really so believe that God commands them to the righteous duty of killing the unbelievers, and that paradise awaits this holy work.

You can't understand the phenomenon of Islamic terrorism if you try and sterilise discussion by pretending it's some kind of passing fad that will fade if the West ignores it and turns the other cheek. There is no evidence that Salafism/Wahhabism is terminally exhausted as an ideology/theology; you can't say that it will fade away if the West stoically refuses to react to it. This strain of Islam has been developing for decades and it's not going anywhere.

The notion that Islamic fundamentalists are simply trying to 'sow division among communities' is far too simplistic. This misapplies Western secular thinking to a deeply religious community. ISIS is deeply committed to an extremely conservative theology. Their jihadists believe they are spiritually commanded to butcher unbelievers and punish the crusader states. They will keep attacking for as long as they, and their interpretations of Islam, persist. How the unbelievers react is of secondary importance only. If we sit here and do nothing, it makes very little difference to them - they don't define success as 'increasing racism in Britain', they define it as 'slaughtering the kuffar'. They are content to keep on killing us because that's what God instructs them to do.

These attacks won't just stop. Doing nothing won't help. ISIS won't give up if we sit tight. There is no reason to say that 'living normally' somehow switches off the theological magnets powering salafist jihadism. This is naive denialism.


It won't get better until Western authorities start taking a smarter approach to integration and religion.
Agreed.
 
Of course, I knew this was coming (in Europe somewhere), but its very sad and disappointing to see it happen again so soon after Manchester.
RIP to the victims.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
The modern, moderate Muslim mosque was actually prepping the soil for the seeds of radical Saudi Wahhabism, which was the ideology of the Manchester bomber.

What are you talking about? The same mosque that reported the attacker to the authorities as radicalised and ended up excluding him? Or other mosque?
 
Pretty much. At best they're a barometer for how bad/tasteless the reporting will get. So far it seems they're just going for the sensationalised drama angle.

Also:
LAMA5GG.jpg


Speaking of, any luck getting through to your friends?

Yes, in a roundabout way. Head Office sent an email out on the attacks, much like they did for the Manchester one, and praised the staff at Borough, pleading them to stay safe. The only way they'd put a message out like that is if they were speaking to a manager in charge at the time. That's one Hell of a relief tonight.

Edit:

The SUn is notorious for making up stories about the Hillsborough disaster. It was at a football match where 96 people were crushed to death by crowds.

The Sun claimed that one set of football fans were urinating on corpses, stealing their wallets and stopping the police giving aid.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/jul/07/pressandpublishing.football1

That's not to say it is always inaccurate, but it doesn't put a premium on the truth.

Indeed, and as JonnyDBrit mentioned, any and all accuracy they have ever reported, like this attack for instance, is spun purely for sensationalism. They are not worth anyone's time.
 

Ashes

Banned
IRA often actively warned beforehand so civilians could get out of harms way. This is different. You can't just count "number of incidents" and say that the situations are the same.

Don't you remember the secondary bombs set to kill the police and those dealing with fake alerts?

They killed hundreds of civilians mate.
 
Yes, in a roundabout way. Head Office sent an email out on the attacks, much like they did for the Manchester one, and praised the staff at Borough, pleading them to stay safe. The only way they'd put a message out like that is if they were speaking to a manager in charge at the time. That's one Hell of a relief tonight.

It's something at least. Glad to hear it.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
IRA was politically motivated, such conflicts always have an end in sight in some way. Not with religiously-motivated conflicts.
 

Newline

Member
IRA often actively warned beforehand so civilians could get out of harms way. This is different. You can't just count "number of incidents" and say that the situations are the same.
I'm not playing terrorism top trumps. I was just suggesting this type of thing is part and parcel of living in London. I don't see it as a reason to change what I'm doing, I'll carry on no matter, I love London far too much.
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
IRA was politically motivated, such conflicts always have an end in sight in some way. Not with religiously-motivated conflicts.

Oh there is an end. The end is when

A - the final kuffar has been eliminated
B - the final violent wahhabist has been eliminated

Take your pick.
 

D i Z

Member
IRA often actively warned beforehand so civilians could get out of harms way. This is different. You can't just count "number of incidents" and say that the situations are the same.

No they didn't. The IRA was notorious for not controlling their own people. They would call in false threats to fuck with people, if that's what you mean by "warnings". Random bombings happened all the fucking time. This lie needs to stop.
 

Dopus

Banned
The Metropolitan police has issued a statement clarifying the timeline of events:

From 22.08hrs [on] 3 June officers responded to reports of a vehicle in collision with pedestrians on London Bridge.

Officers have then responded to reports of stabbings in Borough Market. Armed officers responded and shots have been fired.

Officers subsequently responded to an incident in the Vauxhall area.

At 00.25hrs [on] 4 June the incidents at London Bridge and Borough Market were declared as terrorist incidents.

The incident at Vauxhall is a stabbing and is not believed connected to the other two incidents.

We will release facts when we can – our info must be accurate.

We urge the public to remain calm, but be alert and vigilant.

To anyone near an incident our advice is RUN – HIDE – TELL.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...b0be3ed1922a9f#block-59335ebae4b0be3ed1922a9f
 

Anticol

Banned
Don't you dare bring grieving parents into a discussion like this. If you think torture is right, argue for the merits you perceive it has. But don't use the grief of people to twist a political agenda like that.

Yes I am not talking in their behalf, I am talking from my own experiences, I am from Colombia, I lived next to the house of both most important political parties in the 90's during the years of Pablo Escobar and when FARC was getting bigger and bigger, I was six when 3 car bombs exploted around my house. I have lost friends, due to these kinds of attacks.

I've seen how a school m8 had to leave the country by himself because his entire family was killed by the FARC just because they deny to pay them a fee.

I have seen how people in your countries glorified assassins like Escobar or terrorist grups like FARC. I have seen how people who killed thousands now live free with a great life without any repercussion yet their victims are dead or forgotten and poor. If you want me to empathize with a killer like this, I will never do it and I will not treat them or consider them on the same level as regular people. Sorry I will never do it.

And let me be clear, I have no political agenda, at all, if there is something I hate is politicians and parties.
 

sflufan

Banned
Have we tried a general ceasefire in the mid east yet? Maybe once we take Mosul, we can stop bombing there and it'll stop.

No, that's not how it works with religiously-motivated terrorism. You try that with politically-motivated terrorism, but religiously-motivated terrorism exists within an entirely different context.
 

reckless

Member
Have we tried a general ceasefire in the mid east yet? Maybe once we take Mosul, we can stop bombing there and it'll stop.

Are you actually suggesting a ceasefire with ISIS as a possible solution... really? They want to kill everyone else, you can't have a ceasefire with that.
 

Juicy Bob

Member
One of the most upsetting things is that I don't really know what you can reasonably do to try and prevent incidents like this from happening.
 

Bobnob

Member
IRA was politically motivated, such conflicts always have an end in sight in some way. Not with religiously-motivated conflicts.
From what i remember the ira wasn't going into kids concerts and suicide bombing the place or chopping off heads off military soldiers in the street.If they were that conflict would of been stopped a lot sooner but still a life is a life.
 
Top Bottom