:lol :lolWilly105 said:No Country for Old Men winning was a joke. Juno deserved that award.
Okay I'm out of this thread.
:lol :lolWilly105 said:No Country for Old Men winning was a joke. Juno deserved that award.
Better than Slumdog for sure. I would rate Goodfellas and City of God about equally. They are both fantastic.Dresden said:It's also a better movie than Slumdog or Goodfellas.
I thought City of God was better, although Goodfellas is still a fantastic movie.DennisK4 said:Better than Slumdog for sure. I would rate Goodfellas and City of God about equally. They are both fantastic.
I re-watched it the other week. Still absolutely fantastic.DennisK4 said:Now I feel like watching City of God again.
xbhaskarx said::lol :lol
Okay I'm out of this thread.
WrikaWrek said:True, only the slumdog part actually has in common with City of God. Because the main story arc, has almost zero to do with City of God.
They want to be trolled.noisome07 said:Why? He's just trolling you guys. Are you blind?
Same here man.Calcaneus said:I'll jump for joy if Inglourious Basterds wins.
Chichikov said:Seriously.
Coraline is such a fantastic film, sadly, it's nominated for the Pixar presents - The Academy Award for Best Pixar Movie made by Pixar category.
Steppenwolf said:Similar theme and tone as City of God (which i consider a masterpiece) but really crappy in comparison.
Dresden said:They want to be trolled.
It will win Best Supporting Actor. Leap?Calcaneus said:I'll jump for joy if Inglourious Basterds wins.
I should have qualified it as "a terrible year for Hollywood".Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Also, I think that it was a pretty damn fine year overall. If you want me to back it up, I point first to Ebert's top 20 of the year list; I've only seen about half of the movies on it, but I thought that they were all good to great films.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/the_best_films_of_2009.html
I will admit that it was, perhaps, a weak year in terms of the mainstream cinema, but I think that there were a lot of small- and mid-sized films that were just wonderful (such as Goodbye Solo, for example).
Yes and yes (just so you don't go on hating me too much ).Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Goodfellas is about ten echelons higher than City of God, which is a great movie on its own merits.
Seriously.Dresden said:Agreed. It's sad how it's almost a mandate that Pixar will win.
Calcaneus said:I'll jump for joy if Inglourious Basterds wins.
noisome07 said:Why? He's just trolling you guys. Are you blind?
Door2Dawn said:Can anyone explain to me why Avatar should win best picture?
Willy105 said:No, it's not trolling. Trolling is doing it just to annoy people.
I'm doing it because I believe it.
Door2Dawn said:Can anyone explain to me why Avatar should win best picture?
noisome07 said:Now you're going too far sorry.
Door2Dawn said:Can anyone explain to me why Avatar should win best picture?
http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/Door2Dawn said:Can anyone explain to me why Avatar should win best picture?
Door2Dawn said:Can anyone explain to me why Avatar should win best picture?
Then shouldn't it win art direction and or Cinematography, and not best picture?WrikaWrek said:Because it has amazing visual effects done by WETA, and it uses 3D well.
Defcon said:It's an amazing achievement in cinema? What is "Best Picture?" I don't agree it should win but it surely deserves to be nominated. The Hurt Locker shouldn't even be in there at all.
Door2Dawn said:Then shouldn't it win art direction and or Cinematography, and not best picture?
Simple story that reached out to a lot of people worldwide across cultures and made them actually feel something for creatures that aren't even meant to be human. That's a pretty good picture right there.Door2Dawn said:Then shouldn't it win art direction and or Cinematography, and not best picture?
DevelopmentArrested said:
I'll chug a glass of milk.DevelopmentArrested said:It will win Best Supporting Actor. Leap?
The academy had never "punished" a movie for being popular.Willy105 said:Only thing that may hurt it is that it is a very popular movie among the public.
Wrap up the trophy, ladies and gentlemen. Cameron has done the unachievable!Jibril said:Simple story that reached out to a lot of people worldwide across cultures and made them actually feel something for creatures that aren't even meant to be human. That's a pretty good picture right there.
:lol You make Willy look good.Defcon said:It's an amazing achievement in cinema? What is "Best Picture?" I don't agree it should win but it surely deserves to be nominated. The Hurt Locker shouldn't even be in there at all.
Ha....ha....ha.Defcon said:The Hurt Locker shouldn't even be in there at all.
Yeah it is good, but good enough to win best picture? I don't think so imo.Jibril said:Simple story that reached out to a lot of people worldwide across cultures and made them actually feel something for creatures that aren't even meant to be human. That's a pretty good picture right there.
DevelopmentArrested said:Wrap up the trophy, ladies and gentlemen. Cameron has done the unachievable!
Chichikov said:The academy had never "punished" a movie for being popular.
Quite the opposite actually.
In fact, I'll go as far as saying that there is no way that Avatar was being nominated if it wasn't the highest grossing film of all time.
Not gonna go into the whole Avatar debate again, but seriously man?Jibril said:made them actually feel something for creatures that aren't even meant to be human.
I didn't say every high grossing film wins, I say that the Academy has no problems giving awards to very popular ones.FlawlessCowboy said:The Dark Knight says hi.
FlawlessCowboy said:The Dark Knight says hi.
Chichikov said:Not gonna go into the whole Avatar debate again, but seriously man?
You can't really think that, right?
Timber said:bizarre thread
Jibril said:Say what you will, but being able to connect to a wider audience in a respectable manner is quite an achievement.
FlawlessCowboy said:The Dark Knight says hi.
DevelopmentArrested said:No it isn't. And popularity does not factor into a conversation about the quality of a product. Here's an example?
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=transformers2.htm
Jibril said:Okay, they're meant to be "*blank*able" thus their human aspect can't be ignored. But seriously, some people make sound like Avatar was utter garbage and achieved nothing, while it was an alright film and great in some aspects. :lol
It's like you've landed in a strange dimension isn't it. lol
Setreal said:I guess pulling for Up in the Air is a pretty hopeless cause eh?
DevelopmentArrested said:No it isn't. And popularity does not factor into a conversation about the quality of a product. Here's an example?
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=transformers2.htm