So is this worse than Macklemore?
First-ballot GAF HOFer
It's the same problem, but on a bigger stage.
So is this worse than Macklemore?
First-ballot GAF HOFer
Man really really great post and I agree with it.Because they are.
Look, I didn't even enjoy TPaB on the same magnitude as others did, but come on!
To Pimp a Butterfly was the closest thing to a sure-fire win as I had ever seen. It had massive critical appraise from all sides of journalism, the President of the United fucking States declared it the best album of the year, it dominated Album of the Year charts across all journalism sites, it had a song that became the anthem for the #BlackLivesMatter movement, it had cultural impact on a scale that Taylor Swift would beg to have.
It was the one to beat.
1989 shouldn't have won because it did nothing for the cultural zeitgeist. It sparked a conversation royalties, sure, but what else did it do? Have a slickly made set of music videos? Had a star-studded remix of a song with 2 second cameos? What the fuck did Taylor Swift's album do that Kendrick's didn't do better?
Taylor's album was mainstream pop suitable for the most banal audiences. Kendrick's album was a true attempt at artistry, addressing complex themes while Taylor talks about her image as a serial dater and love and shots fired at Katy Perry. It couldn't hold a candle to TPaB.
The voters ARE out of touch, and I hope nay I pray someone talks about this tomorrow. Because what happened here is a travesty on a scale that the Grammys should wish never happens again. I hope articles and articles are written on this bullshit, and I hope the Academy gets eviscerated. They gave the wrong album the title, and I hope they know that by tomorrow.
Guys guys guys.
When's the last time anyone thought to him or herself "Man, the thing is, Raising Sand was just a better record than In Rainbows cuz it won the Grammy's for best album."
Get real.
Full disclosure, I like Raising Sand. A lot.
Also Taylor is phony as fuck and I can't stand here. Crying because Ed Sheron won come on now.
That scene fits that song so well.
I get what you're saying, and I don't disagree with your opinions. Frankly, I agree with almost everything you're saying. I think TPAB is art. I think 1989 is fluff. The part where we differ, is that I don't think anyone is obligated to vote for something on any grounds; I understand that a lot of people, probably most, and clearly most of the people who voted for these awards, do not listen to music for social change, nor should they be obligated to. And while I may think they should be giving it to TPAB for its artistic merit (or Art Angels, for me personally), I also think truly artistic music is becoming less and less valued in general, not just by the Grammys, but in the culture. But that's neither here nor there.It may not matter to you, but think about it in the larger view. If TPaB won, it would be a validation of hip-hop as a tool for social change, of impact. It would validate the work of people of Killer Mike and Kendrick, people using music as an avenue for societal change. It would show the world that an album as unabashedly black as TPaB is could be recognized in a world that tends to disadvantage African-Americans in ways that no other minority faces. It would be a statement that would overall have a positive impact. Maybe I'm just delusional, but TPaB winning would have been a seminal moment for both hip-hop and music as a medium for change. You're right in that it doesn't need awards to be great or to show its message is real, but it should have gotten one to reflect the unanimous praise it received and social impact it had for an album. It showed the true potential of an album's impact, and it lost to a hyper-polished slickly made collection of singles that sold well.
Right now, there is a divide between true artistic music and music made to sell, and the Grammys could be a tool to reconcile that divide. But it doesn't and continues to reward legacy acts and pop stars.
Just my two cents before I head to sleep.
Schattenjäger;195442655 said:I liked it even more than Sea Change
But that's the thing .. Music is subjective
Even more so than any other media
Can't believe all the salt in this thread .. I bet Kendrick ain't even sweating it
He also said this in a Billboard interview"I Want to Win Them All'
And he had the most grammy nominations since Michael Jackson thriller and was still shut out of the 3 major categories.“It’s bigger than me. When we think about the Grammys, only Lauryn Hill and Outkast have won album of the year. This would be big for hip-hop culture at large.”
Grammys are a joke, Uptown Funk winning mothering fucking RECORD OF THE YEAR makes me feel like Kendrick shoulda gotten green slime poured on him at the the end of his performance.
Yeah but he got 5 tho so he should be happy.... >.>.Really you think Kendrick did not care? Kendrick said this about his 11 grammy nominations He also said this in a Billboard interview And he had the most grammy nominations since thriller and was still shut out of the 3 major categories.
GHOST won a grammy! Hell yes!
It's not so tough if you have a desk job with headphones on all day. That's 7+ albums every day.
Yeah I mostly agree with this post. Although I have this strange fear that the Kendrick Lamar performance and the Kendrick Lamar snub will largely be ignored and people will instead be distracted by Taylor Swift firing shots at The Grammys.Because they are.
Look, I didn't even enjoy TPaB on the same magnitude as others did, but come on!
To Pimp a Butterfly was the closest thing to a sure-fire win as I had ever seen. It had massive critical appraise from all sides of journalism, the President of the United fucking States declared it the best album of the year, it dominated Album of the Year charts across all journalism sites, it had a song that became the anthem for the #BlackLivesMatter movement, it had cultural impact on a scale that Taylor Swift would beg to have.
It was the one to beat.
1989 shouldn't have won because it did nothing for the cultural zeitgeist. It sparked a conversation royalties, sure, but what else did it do? Have a slickly made set of music videos? Had a star-studded remix of a song with 2 second cameos? What the fuck did Taylor Swift's album do that Kendrick's didn't do better?
Taylor's album was mainstream pop suitable for the most banal audiences. Kendrick's album was a true attempt at artistry, addressing complex themes while Taylor talks about her image as a serial dater and love and shots fired at Katy Perry. It couldn't hold a candle to TPaB.
The voters ARE out of touch, and I hope nay I pray someone talks about this tomorrow. Because what happened here is a travesty on a scale that the Grammys should wish never happens again. I hope articles and articles are written on this bullshit, and I hope the Academy gets eviscerated. They gave the wrong album the title, and I hope they know that by tomorrow.
Hip-hop literally gets zero respect.
Hip-hop gets plenty of respect from the Grammys. Televised performances, major awards, major nominations, etc. It also gets plenty of respect from academia and reputed publications. It also gets regularly played on radio and in clubs. It's widely considered a hip, cool genre, and chances are your friends won't complain if you play it in the car.
Metal is the real genre that doesn't get respect, from the Grammys or anyone else. As someone who is a fan of both, the persecution complex of some hip-hop fans is laughable to me. Like, maybe if you're a fan of technical rap or something like that I could get where you're coming from. But Kanye? Kendrick? The music press rides their nuts like there's no tomorrow. "Genius" and "poet" are thrown around liberally. Their albums sell well, their videos have a bajillion hits, they headline major festivals, get performance time on major shows, etc.
This isn't even a case of Grammys shafting black artists. There are so many mainstream classic albums by white artists that have won zero Grammys. Dark Side of the Moon, all of Bob Dylan's '60s albums (despite being widely considered the voice of his generation at the time), all of the Rolling Stones '60s/'70s albums, the list goes on. TPaB won five Grammys. That's "zero respect" to you?
Note for everyone:grammy award-winning metal band Ghost
omg
fucking awesome
Does Kanye seriously claim that he made Swift famous just because he put her name in a song?
To Pimp a Butterfly was the closest thing to a sure-fire win as I had ever seen. It had massive critical appraise from all sides of journalism, the President of the United fucking States declared it the best album of the year, it dominated Album of the Year charts across all journalism sites, it had a song that became the anthem for the #BlackLivesMatter movement, it had cultural impact on a scale that Taylor Swift would beg to have.
Seriously? I'd never heard of it until today. 1989 though? Everywhere. Say what you will but 89 had global cultural impact. Truly global.
Let's consider how much bigger of an audience listens to rap versus metal. Not that popularity should be a sole defining factor by any means but album of the year should be something that defines that year for a portion of the generation. However, I do agree people shouldn't take the 5 grammys he did win lightly. The Grammys also made a much bigger push towards representing black people within the music industry.Hip-hop gets plenty of respect from the Grammys. Televised performances, major awards, major nominations, etc. It also gets plenty of respect from academia and reputed publications. It also gets regularly played on radio and in clubs. It's widely considered a hip, cool genre, and chances are your friends won't complain if you play it in the car.
Metal is the real genre that doesn't get respect, from the Grammys or anyone else. As someone who is a fan of both, the persecution complex of some hip-hop fans is laughable to me. Like, maybe if you're a fan of technical rap or something like that I could get where you're coming from. But Kanye? Kendrick? The music press rides their nuts like there's no tomorrow. "Genius" and "poet" are thrown around liberally. Their albums sell well, their videos have a bajillion hits, they headline major festivals, get performance time on major shows, etc.
This isn't even a case of Grammys shafting black artists. There are so many mainstream classic albums by white artists that have won zero Grammys. Dark Side of the Moon, all of Bob Dylan's '60s albums (despite being widely considered the voice of his generation at the time), all of the Rolling Stones '60s/'70s albums, the list goes on. TPaB won five Grammys. That's "zero respect" to you?
Hip-hop gets plenty of respect from the Grammys. Televised performances, major awards, major nominations, etc. It also gets plenty of respect from academia and reputed publications. It also gets regularly played on radio and in clubs. It's widely considered a hip, cool genre, and chances are your friends won't complain if you play it in the car.
Metal is the real genre that doesn't get respect, from the Grammys or anyone else. As someone who is a fan of both, the persecution complex of some hip-hop fans is laughable to me. Like, maybe if you're a fan of technical rap or something like that I could get where you're coming from. But Kanye? Kendrick? The music press rides their nuts like there's no tomorrow. "Genius" and "poet" are thrown around liberally. Their albums sell well, their videos have a bajillion hits, they headline major festivals, get performance time on major shows, etc.
This isn't even a case of Grammys shafting black artists. There are so many mainstream classic albums by white artists that have won zero Grammys. Dark Side of the Moon, all of Bob Dylan's '60s albums (despite being widely considered the voice of his generation at the time), all of the Rolling Stones '60s/'70s albums, the list goes on. TPaB won five Grammys. That's "zero respect" to you?
Are you from the U.S.?
What "cultural impact" did 1989 have? Genuinely curious.
Changed lives it did.Seriously? I'd never heard of it until today. 1989 though? Everywhere. Say what you will but 89 had global cultural impact. Truly global.
Wow...No, Australia.
What cultural impact did the Kendrick Lamar thing have? Like is said I'd never fucking heard of it before today.
No, Australia.
What cultural impact did the Kendrick Lamar thing have? Like is said I'd never fucking heard of it before today.
I agree with you, but the voters and majority of music listeners are not sophisticated and they prefer Taylor. It has always been this way. Pop wins over culturally significant music. Music shows are about advertising and money and they need viewers and ad revenue. Taylor has over 1 billion Youtube views vs Kendrick maybe hundreds of millions (just guessing, no easy way to tell). It is all about money, not talent.
It may not matter to you, but think about it in the larger view. If TPaB won, it would be a validation of hip-hop as a tool for social change, of impact. It would validate the work of people of Killer Mike and Kendrick, people using music as an avenue for societal change. It would show the world that an album as unabashedly black as TPaB is could be recognized in a world that tends to disadvantage African-Americans in ways that no other minority faces. It would be a statement that would overall have a positive impact. Maybe I'm just delusional, but TPaB winning would have been a seminal moment for both hip-hop and music as a medium for change. You're right in that it doesn't need awards to be great or to show its message is real, but it should have gotten one to reflect the unanimous praise it received and social impact it had for an album. It showed the true potential of an album's impact, and it lost to a hyper-polished slickly made collection of singles that sold well.
Right now, there is a divide between true artistic music and music made to sell, and the Grammys could be a tool to reconcile that divide. But it doesn't and continues to reward legacy acts and pop stars.
Just my two cents before I head to sleep.
No, Australia.
What cultural impact did the Kendrick Lamar thing have? Like is said I'd never fucking heard of it before today.
Cultural impact is not the dominant factor for an awards show that has traditionally rewarded success over all.
How could you think that when you just heard about the album?You really need to step back from this, it's way over the top. I think the album can do all those things without winning an Emmy.
No, because of the VMAs. And it was clear he was being facetious. The line was in poor taste though, I'll admit.
No, Australia.
What cultural impact did the Kendrick Lamar thing have? Like is said I'd never fucking heard of it before today.
Popularity isn't the only factor. Arcade Fire and Beck's wins were weird attempts at credibility; both albums also appealed to the voters' older members. And sometimes an old artist releases an album and wins all the major awards despite having little sales or radio success. But overall if you look at the winners it is largely a popularity contest.Arcade Fire winning disproves the popularity thing. C'mon yall. Something just doesn't add up.
How could you think that when you just heard about the album?
Have you listened to hip-hop in the passed year fam?No, Australia.
What cultural impact did the Kendrick Lamar thing have? Like is said I'd never fucking heard of it before today.
From what everyone is saying it was a rallying point for the black community last year. Personally I wasn't aware of it, but that's hardly surprising. The last album I downloaded was MMLP2...
My point is I don't think it's cultural relevance will be lessened by the fact it didn't win a fucking Grammy. I think you're overstating how important that award is to it becoming revered as a cultural cornerstone.
Seriously? I'd never heard of it until today. 1989 though? Everywhere. Say what you will but 89 had global cultural impact. Truly global.
No, Australia.
What cultural impact did the Kendrick Lamar thing have? Like is said I'd never fucking heard of it before today.
Swift already had the second-best selling country single of all time in 2008. I don't think Kanye had anything to do with her success, whatever he tells himself.
Fuck the Grammys
Which is why I said he was being facetious. Stupid line that even a lot fans of the album (and song) agree should've been left out.