I have decided to take the plunge and buy a used 350z. Going to view a few tomorrow with very low mileage.
Is there anything that I should be looking out for/common 350z wear and tear issues?
ps- Alpha, your 370z is hot as fuck. Love those wheels.
Also, I loathe Mazda's smiley cars!
As stated a few pages ago, where I drive so little, I'm very conscious that I do not want to drop buckets of cash into this although obviously want a nice little toy.
The choice I have for the amount I'm looking to spend is either get an 07-08 with around 60,000 miles or anywhere from an 03-05 with under 30,000 miles (there are quite a few out there surprisingly!).
I've noted your comments on the improvements in the later models but bear in mind, I'm coming from an Audi A4 so whatever I get will feel rapid.
I'm also from the UK so I don't think we got the same choice of models as you did in the US.
With that in mind, what would you go for and are there any major issues with the older models that you're aware of? Thanks in advance and I promise not to further hijack this thread!
Thankfully they've added a back-up camera as an option. I haven't driven a Camaro with one, but I'd go as far to guess that it's necessary. I wouldn't buy a Camaro without one.Boo this man! Lol, just kidding.
In all honesty though, the smiley isn't that bad... on a Mazdaspeed3. The car looks like it's grinning and I think it's perfect for a car like that since the driver is probably grinning ear to ear every time he drives that monster. On the Miata though, it almost looks like an abomination sometimes, so I'm pretty glad I got a pre-smiley Miata lol.
Regarding the Camaro vs Mustang. My experience with the Camaro is that it drives like a boat for the most part, though that impression comes from a 2010 model, I found it a little cumbersome for daily driving. Also, that interior is seriously horrible... it's almost damn near impossible to park it backwards since there's very little visibility at the rear. I haven't been able to drive a current-gen Mustang though since none of my friends own one, so I can't comment on that.
Anyway, has anybody ever been refused a test drive before? I was at a Scion dealership earlier to look at an FR-S and I was refused a test drive since they didn't trust my driving skills because I'm less than 25 years old. Ironically enough, the salesman who approached me was a little taken aback since a "kid" like me drives a 6 speed Miata. I wasn't too happy about it since I really wanted to test drive it and my bro is a serious buyer, but whatever, they just lost a customer.
How about a BMW WRX S-line?
Thankfully they've added a back-up camera as an option. I haven't driven a Camaro with one, but I'd go as far to guess that it's necessary. I wouldn't buy a Camaro without one.
Yeah. I'm sure that's part of it. When I drove the Camaro, the only car I had was my Olds. So I was used to seeing this when I turned around:The whole issue of rear visibility comes from being too new to a car or having a hard time adapting to something new. I drove the Camaro, parallel parked it just fine, backed it into spots just fine, backed into angled spots even - no problems. I just make have all three of my mirrors set up correctly, the way I was taught at BMW's performance school like 7 years ago. I've driven the CTS Coupe briefly, and again, same as the Camaro didn't have an issue adapting to its visibility.
The one and only car I never got used to driving, ever, was the X6 and that's because the rear window is too small to fit when looked at through the rear view mirror - and the upward angle of the rear deck forces you to see simply straight back and slightly up. So because of the car's elevated stance, you simply see OVER the cars behind you with a significantly smaller window to make it all worse - so you see nothing at all. That car genuinely needs sensors and a camera as standard equipment - otherwise, it's like driving a commercial Ford Econoline van.
As far as I'm concerned, the CTS, Camaro, Corvette, and even my own 370Z are very easy cars to drive and see out of.
Velvet bloodbath.Yeah. I'm sure that's part of it. When I drove the Camaro, the only car I had was my Olds. So I was used to seeing this when I turned around:
The car has no passenger side mirror, and has a tiny driver's side mirror. The car is so long that I can usually see cars in my rear view mirror if there's enough space to move in front of them. So I kind of got used to not using mirrors. It took some adjusting to get used to driving my Malibu, thanks to its relatively thick pillars, but now I'm used to it. Like you said, learning to adjust the mirrors properly helped with that.
Velvet bloodbath.
The whole issue of rear visibility comes from being too new to a car or having a hard time adapting to something new.
Did the salesman know you drove a Miata before he refused you?
Anyway, has anybody ever been refused a test drive before? I was at a Scion dealership earlier to look at an FR-S and I was refused a test drive since they didn't trust my driving skills because I'm less than 25 years old. Ironically enough, the salesman who approached me was a little taken aback since a "kid" like me drives a 6 speed Miata. I wasn't too happy about it since I really wanted to test drive it and my bro is a serious buyer, but whatever, they just lost a customer.
Just to throw a wrench into this minefield of a thread, I picked up my new (to me) car today....
Smoove. It's like everyone in this thread (except Enron) is buying new cars every day.
I really wanted a BRZ, but they are just too hard to come by right now. You either get one from a dealer with a bunch of options you don't want, and possibly with a few $k markup, or you order one and wait until late this year or early next year for it to arrive. My old car wasn't going to last much longer, so I had to pull the trigger soon.
I looked at GTIs and Mazdaspeed 3s, but with both due for replacement soon, I just didn't want to lock myself into a new $26k+ car that will soon feel old news. The Z was a relative steal, so I can pay it off in a year or so, and then look at what is new and tempting.
Just to throw a wrench into this minefield of a thread, I picked up my new (to me) car today....
It's a 2003 350Z Track, with only 74k on the clock. A few minor paint blemishes here and there, but the interior is spotless, and it rides like new. The wheels are in perfect shape, and you gotta love those big gold Brembos. I'm LOVING it.
I really wanted a Subaru BRZ, but due to their limited availability, and dealer markups, it just wasn't going to work anytime in the near future. This will be a nice hold-over for a couple years until I see what comes of the new GTI, the new Mazda 6(MS6?), and the STi version of the BRZ. Should be a new Z in a couple years too, so who knows. In the meantime, though, I couldn't be happier.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIcGHY_Al_I&feature=player_embedded#!
must be biased cause that spool sounds godly
Dear God. I <3 you Horatio Pagani.
You shouldn't be paying $26k+ for a new MS3 anyway.
Smart choice. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. I just came back home and had a roaring time in my 370Z driving back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIcGHY_Al_I&feature=player_embedded#!
must be biased cause that spool sounds godly
Usually when this thread gets ugly, its coming from the same set of posters. Wish it wasn't always like that, but it is.
Yup. Pagani may be the last of the makers of true exotics.
So which do you guys think looks better, the E39 or the F10? I really like the E39 but the F10 looks great too, an improvement over the E60.
I know it's not what you asked, but if you're a driver, nothing newer than the E36.
So which do you guys think looks better, the E39 or the F10? I really like the E39 but the F10 looks great too, an improvement over the E60.
For me it goes like this:
E39 > E28 > E34 > F10 > E60
The M5 has consistently been good to great. E60 is last due solely to its unfortunate looks.
This thread is so hilarious...say one negative thing (even if its true) about the Z and you get instant shitted on by Alpha. Sigh...
Hey, show some respect. How many other sports cars can say they share a platform with not just an SUV, but a crossover AND a minivan?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...LGRAND.jpg/800px-2002-2004_NISSAN_ELGRAND.jpg
This thread is so hilarious...say one negative thing (even if its true) about the Z and you get instant shitted on by Alpha. Sigh...
Hey, show some respect. How many other sports cars can say they share a platform with not just an SUV, but a crossover AND a minivan?
Let the Better Business Bureau know because that's some horseshit. Or shoot a note/phonecall to the GM of the dealership or go talk to Toyota USA directly. Even Audi let me test drive their S lines.
Hey, show some respect. How many other sports cars can say they share a platform with not just an SUV, but a crossover AND a minivan?[/IMG]
Criticise my F30 and see what happens.
Also both of those 370Z interiors look cheap. And dirty.
It's not just logical to do this, it's smart business practice.
Straws.
You're grasping at them.
This is some 'Final Fantasy on 360'-level nonsense right here.I am, yes. But it's still less respectable than a car built on its own platform.
Look back at the original 240Z. Do you really think that, given another 30 or so years, that the 350/370 will be as celebrated as that one? One reason is that it's less pure of a vehicle. The blood line is diluted.
Long live the Toyobaru!
So I hydroplaned on a country road driving to my sisters house in rural virginia, and spun and hit a fence.
We are all okay but RIP E36.
I have an e30 that it will donate its soul into.
This is some 'Final Fantasy on 360'-level nonsense right here.
Seriously...
I'm not even bothering with that charlatan. Chael Sonnen's time is better than that.