If you do not already subscribe to this channel I would do so now...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWzL6WOhWOw&feature=g-u-u
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWzL6WOhWOw&feature=g-u-u
I haven't had much exposure to performance tires in a long time but the Continental Extreme Contact DWS that are on my car seem to be damn good (for all weather). The previous owner didn't know how many miles were on them but when I ran the Carfax before I bought it I found out that they only had 9000 miles on them. The dealer installed them right before they put the car up for sale.
They don't have an excessive amount of road noise and they aren't very harsh. The owner was running 32lbs f/r and I corrected that to the BMW rec'd 32 F / 38 R the morning after I picked it up before hitting the twisties. They didn't complain much with some pretty hard cornering but I haven't had a chance to really push them yet.
I plan on doing an autocross later this month and am interested to see how they really perform but I have been very pleased with their wet/dry performance and comfort so far.
When are we going to start hearing news on the F30 coupe or the M3/M4?
Need some info
When are we going to start hearing news on the F30 coupe or the M3/M4?
Need some info
Probably not until late next year.
This is the latest render based on the disguised test mules that have been seen in public.
http://www.f30post.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=759756&d=1349367813
Probably not until late next year.
This is the latest render based on the disguised test mules that have been seen in public.
Sorry Jaguar, this is my next.
nah Jaguar still looks much better imo. This is too much deja-vu.
Well, they already have the 5/6 series. Granted, the 8 series wasn't a 7 series coupe.I believe Autoblog or Car and Driver recently posted more spy shots of the F30 M3. It's at least 60% naked or so, and looks as you'd expect it to look.
I really hope they don't decide to follow Audi with the whole A4/A5 3/4-Series shit. The 3-Series is a legend. Turning the coupe/convertible into the 4-series would be stupid and pointless.
It worked for Audi because they still use a simple nomenclature: A# -- Engine Displacement. BMW is really starting to reach new levels of stupidity with their nomenclature. Especially with the new M Line that's set to replace "is".
For one they should get rid of the "i" since last I checked it stands for fuel-injection which seems incredibly redundant now. Both them and MB need to either start using engine displacements for their names (320 rather than 328) (C180 rather than C250) or just switch to Audi's system.
Aaaand I've gone on a minor rant.
I haven't had much exposure to performance tires in a long time but the Continental Extreme Contact DWS that are on my car seem to be damn good (for all weather). The previous owner didn't know how many miles were on them but when I ran the Carfax before I bought it I found out that they only had 9000 miles on them. The dealer installed them right before they put the car up for sale.
They don't have an excessive amount of road noise and they aren't very harsh. The owner was running 32lbs f/r and I corrected that to the BMW rec'd 32 F / 38 R the morning after I picked it up before hitting the twisties. They didn't complain much with some pretty hard cornering but I haven't had a chance to really push them yet.
I plan on doing an autocross later this month and am interested to see how they really perform but I have been very pleased with their wet/dry performance and comfort so far.
A stock GTR is not faster than a ZR1, your talking a 125mph car vs a 130mph car, its really not even close. A ford GT is a drivers race.
When I (08 viper) race my friends stock 13' GTR I pull it pretty easily from 50mph on. The 13 Gt500 that was with us does the same thing.
A stock GTR is not faster than a ZR1, your talking a 125mph car vs a 130mph car, its really not even close. A ford GT is a drivers race.
When I (08 viper) race my friends stock 13' GTR I pull it pretty easily from 50mph on. The 13 Gt500 that was with us does the same thing.
A 2013 Nissan GT-R will hit 0-60 MPH in 2.7 seconds.
It has a top speed of 193 MPH.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 2008 Dodge Viper SRT-10 will hit 0-60 MPH in 3.7 seconds.
It has a top speed of 200 MPH.
So please, oh please tell me what kind of designer drug you take when you're racing your friend and you pull away from a '13 GT-R at 50 MPH.
Let's not even talk about drag races: the Viper loses. Even the mighty ZR1 which tops out at 205MPH and has a 3.4 second 0-60 time would be hard pressed to put those horses to use at 50 MPH.
Let's also please not talk about actual driving on a racetrack, as your rolling start comparison implies: I hate to use the adage about many American cars, but let's face it: The Viper wasn't exactly built to turn around corners.
I mean, a GT-R (R33) V-Spec lapped the 'Ring faster in 1996 than an '05 Viper. Even if it was a V-Spec, you're telling me that a stock supercar couldn't outperform a nearly decade old car?
It's rare for that to happen, and when it happens it's usually because the car is legendary (F1) or in a completely different class of vehicle.
Mind you, I'm not even a GT-R fanboy. In fact I think they're ugly as sin, but game recognize game so to say, and the GT-R is the greatest car that Japan has ever produced.
And for the coup de grâce: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDQcVJ94cAA
Actually that's not such an outlandish claim.
Also why are you giving 0-60 numbers when he said from 50?
Everyone knows the viper has more trouble hooking up off the line than the GT-R, but from 50, it wouldn't shock me if the viper pulled away strongly.
The GT-R is clearly the better car in every other way imaginable, but this particular scenario is probably the one thing the viper can beat it at.
A stock GTR is not faster than a ZR1
<3The concern is that when so many strong flavors get thrown into the pot, the result often doesn't make coherent, appealing sense: you know there's a lot going on, you're just not sure what it is.
The aim was to pull the Evoque trick. The little Englishman is the Land Rover of the small premium crossover segment not merely due to the words on the hood, but because it embodies unique and definable brand values. Likewise, Mazda engineers didn't want to create a Mazda for the mid-sized segment, a charge one might apply to the last car, but the Mazda of the midsize segment.
Kajiyama said his team benchmarked the BMW 3 Series, Audi A4 and Volkswagen Passat. He said they also studied the Camry, Altima and Fusion, but that he wouldn't let his engineers drive them to and from work. Why not? "I told them 'Your senses get dull.'"
It worked. The Mazda6 definitely isn't.
Highlighting, pun intended, the forward aspect is a brand-new headlight design featuring Mazda firsts: LED halos around the single-element bulbs and LED daytime driving lights. The way the hood cuts back over the bulb, the way the LED DRLs are interrupted by the bulb and the fact that the bulbs are so far outboard intensifies the impression of a piercing stare. It make us think anime or Autobot, either one being a good thing, and Mazda estimates a coefficient of drag of just 0.26, which is even better.
The Euro-spec sedan with a 2.5-liter gasoline engine, automatic transmission and i-ELOOP brake energy regeneration system weighs 2,992 pounds. That's a 337-pound weight loss over the current Mazda6 with the automatic, otherwise known as "having your cake." When it comes time to eat it, you'll be happy to know that torsional rigidity has been upped by more than 30 percent.
Will any other cars in its price segment come with LEDs in the foreseeable future?
If you do not already subscribe to this channel I would do so now...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWzL6WOhWOw&feature=g-u-u
If you do not already subscribe to this channel I would do so now...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWzL6WOhWOw&feature=g-u-u
Quick question: my cousin and I were discussing the FR-S/BRZ the other day and he was quoting some sales numbers about how the ratio of those sold is something like 3 FR-S:1 BRZ.
Why is everybody getting the FR-S over the BRZ? Is it availability? The "hip" factor (I've always seen Scions as something for young guys)? Pricing?
Quick question: my cousin and I were discussing the FR-S/BRZ the other day and he was quoting some sales numbers about how the ratio of those sold is something like 3 FR-S:1 BRZ.
Why is everybody getting the FR-S over the BRZ? Is it availability? The "hip" factor (I've always seen Scions as something for young guys)? Pricing?
Sub-3000lb midsize sedan? I'll be damned.
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/05/2014-mazda6-first-drive-review/
How about from a dig? It'll come down to how good you, the ZR-1, and especially the Shelby driver are. Or 0-60. 0-100? I'm not calling you out, but I love when people try to take a car's advantages away from it
So please, oh please tell me what kind of designer drug you take when you're racing your friend and you pull away from a '13 GT-R at 50 MPH.
Let's not even talk about drag races: the Viper loses. Even the mighty ZR1 which tops out at 205MPH and has a 3.4 second 0-60 time would be hard pressed to put those horses to use at 50 MPH.
Did you see it in Laval? I saw it a couple weeks ago and my Lord is the sound amazing.Saw a live LF-A yesterday nearby... first time I saw a LFA in the province of Quebec("Hell it never appeared at Car shows in this province") The Exhaust noise... is orgasmic. Jaw on the floor... If I win the lottery, it's either an LF-A or an aventador.
We have never run from a dig, he would win on the street. From a roll he will always get a slight jump, then I will slowly pull away. We want to get to the track soon, but I have headers and a PCM going in plus drag radials. I know he plans on keeping it stock. I really don't care which car is faster, but I hate how everyone looks at magazine times and thinks the GTR is gods gift. Lap times are really subjective to A LOT more factors, but the ZR1, Z06, viper, Ford GT etc. hold their own and beat GTRs on certain tracks and vise versa. ( Check out http://www.fastestlaps.com/ ) The potential for a ZR1 or 08+ viper is greater than a GTR's. A GTR will always run more consistent e/ts
I don't know where to begin with you but here goes.....Fastest STOCK ZR1 1/4 mile 10.664@132.92. Fastest STOCK GTR 10.87@125. I can't find the viper's, but it's similar to the ZR1. Please go back to reading motor trend and watching top gear.
A stock GTR is not faster than a ZR1, your talking a 125mph car vs a 130mph car, its really not even close. A ford GT is a drivers race.
When I (08 viper) race my friends stock 13' GTR I pull it pretty easily from 50mph on. The 13 Gt500 that was with us does the same thing.
A stock GTR is not faster than a ZR1, your talking a 125mph car vs a 130mph car, its really not even close. A ford GT is a drivers race.
When I (08 viper) race my friends stock 13' GTR I pull it pretty easily from 50mph on. The 13 Gt500 that was with us does the same thing.
I have a question on cars. Which one's better:
2012 TL SH-AWD Acura TL
2012 Infinity G37x AWD
damn a ZR1s top speed is only 130? Ive been that speed in my MR2, on flat ground
Hell I have been 120 in 4th gear
damn a ZR1s top speed is only 130? Ive been that speed in my MR2, on flat ground
Hell I have been 120 in 4th gear
damn a ZR1s top speed is only 130? Ive been that speed in my MR2, on flat ground
Hell I have been 120 in 4th gear
Did you see it in Laval? I saw it a couple weeks ago and my Lord is the sound amazing.
You had me until the "overrated" part. Which cars out there for the same value match the GT-R's capabilities again? Outside of an Ariel Atom, I think you'd be hard pressed.
We have never run from a dig, he would win on the street. From a roll he will always get a slight jump, then I will slowly pull away. We want to get to the track soon, but I have headers and a PCM going in plus drag radials. I know he plans on keeping it stock. I really don't care which car is faster, but I hate how everyone looks at magazine times and thinks the GTR is gods gift. Lap times are really subjective to A LOT more factors, but the ZR1, Z06, viper, Ford GT etc. hold their own and beat GTRs on certain tracks and vise versa. ( Check out http://www.fastestlaps.com/ ) The potential for a ZR1 or 08+ viper is greater than a GTR's. A GTR will always run more consistent e/ts .
Z06, zr1, viper to name a few
I have a question on cars. Which one's better:
2012 TL SH-AWD Acura TL
2012 Infinity G37x AWD
I know it happens. I hate on a car getting praised a lot, the 86 for example. I think it's overrated, but I've come to accept that it's probably a fun daily beater, or maybe at a very small and tight autox, and it's incredibly cheap. The GT-R gets it's hype due to it's cost to performance. There's no denying it's performance and capabilities. It also has the factor in which it allows average drivers to exploit it's capabilities easier than cars like you have and mentioned. Also, I'm not sure how it's limited in it's potential compared to the others. It, for the money, is the best ultra-performance, value per dollar, daily-livable car out there. If we were talking track cars, then I'd have to give the nod to the Ariel Atom SC, halving the cost of the GT-R nearly.
Not sure if you're joking, but he's talking about trap speed at the end of a quarter mile.
I'd get an EX35 over a G37x AWD...The biggest problem with the G is the dated interior, which the EX35 solves. And it's not a SUV, it's a hatchback.
For a real comparison, the G would be the sportier one of the two. Drive both and you will see. Myself, I'd get neither and get a 3 series, or an A4 if that's too expensive.
Yeah. My favorite car is the Boogati VEYRON and it has a million horsepowers and tons of torks brah. I sleep with a copy of Motor Trend and hate the 911 because Clarkson said so.
Anyways, let me just post what you said again:
Your first sentence claims that a quartermile between a ZR1 and a GT-R is "not even close" So we get the hyperbole train going with that one. You then throw in the Ford GT for shits and giggles and never mention it again, so I left it out of this. Unless you were referring to the GT500 that you mention in your second sentence. They're different cars, you know?
You've also now stated that your Viper isn't stock, while his car is stock. You also state in your latest response that GT-Rs do beat the cars you listed on some tracks which seems to clash with your original statement that "A stock GTR is not faster than a ZR1".
Not to mention that this all started based on the 991 CS' 'Ring time. Here's a link to the 2013 GT-R's 'Ring time:
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/2013-nissan-gt-r-laps-nurburgring-in-7-16-ar135274.html
7:16'X. I don't believe a ZR1 has topped that time, 2013 or otherwise.
So maybe I misunderstood your original statement because it was all over the place with various cars and various situations, but just as you don't like people proclaiming that a Deity's hand built the GT-R, I find it equally silly to dismiss the car's incredible performance.
Let's also please not talk about actual driving on a racetrack, as your rolling start comparison implies: I hate to use the adage about many American cars, but let's face it: The Viper wasn't exactly built to turn around corners.
Let's also please not talk about actual driving on a racetrack, as your rolling start comparison implies: I hate to use the adage about many American cars, but let's face it: The Viper wasn't exactly built to turn around corners.
smh.
This is why I don't bother with car threads on non-car forums.
I know it happens. I hate on a car getting praised a lot, the 86 for example. I think it's overrated, but I've come to accept that it's probably a fun daily beater, or maybe at a very small and tight autox, and it's incredibly cheap. The GT-R gets it's hype due to it's cost to performance. There's no denying it's performance and capabilities. It also has the factor in which it allows average drivers to exploit it's capabilities easier than cars like you have and mentioned. Also, I'm not sure how it's limited in it's potential compared to the others. It, for the money, is the best ultra-performance, value per dollar, daily-livable car out there. If we were talking track cars, then I'd have to give the nod to the Ariel Atom SC, halving the cost of the GT-R nearly.
So my father is thinking about getting something more fun now, and has been looking at the ford focus ST and the Mustang v6. Does anyone have experience with reliability with the mustang v6? in addition, how is the focus platforms overall reliability, any personal accounts?
I really don't know what's hard to understand about this. I mentioned the ford GT because of the original argument, that a GTR is faster than anything around it's price range. The gt500 was mentioned because it was there when I raced the GTR.
Where did I dismiss the performance of the GTR? I said its not faster than a ZR1. Then posted the actual 1/4 mile records for both cars...do you think a 10.6 @ 132 is close to 10.9 @125....do you know what those numbers mean ? Have you ever been to an actual track or strip ? A GTR is more consistent...not faster.
My viper was stock when I raced the GTR....I said I have headers and a pcm GOING in.
The viper wasn't meant built to go around corners....so what was it built for?...enlighten me.
smh.
This is why I don't bother with car threads on non-car forums.