RukusProvider
Banned
Motherfucking titty christmas...what the hell is a Chrysler 300M doing on Laguna Seca? Hahahaha
Plowing.
Motherfucking titty christmas...what the hell is a Chrysler 300M doing on Laguna Seca? Hahahaha
I was just showing off the 90's not trying to compare it to the 00's or 10's
Beyond ridiculous. You have huge 90s blinders on. Your entire argument hinges upon 5 or so select cars that you liked over the years -- and many of them one-off special versions that you can't even buy in the US, or even full out supercars here and there to make the argument that 90s design was overall better than today? Absolutely nuts and a clear cut example of selection bias.
I think most of us here are products of the 90s.
you should put the previous generation Taurus, the ones used in Robocop
I don't understand your argument. I bet if we were in the 90's you'd be raving about how beautiful those cars are and how modulating the styling was compared to the 80's. Taste is subjective and fashion evolves over time. Part of the reason you think that the cars of today are infinitely better looking is because of society's influence.
The case that Toyota and Honda are releasing boring-as-sin cars today? At least Nissan is releasing interesting cars even if I'm not a big fan of their aesthetic.
His list also includes a Subaru... Subaru has made about two good looking cars in the company's lifetime.
Yeah, not gonna shed a tear for the fall from grace of Toyota and Honda anymore.
But all of those Japanese companies that used to be at the forefront of design in the 90s (lol!) have now been upended by the US' revival and replaced by South Korean manufacturers. I won't even get into how Audi and Jaguar are killing it as of late.
Let's also remember this: N-Bomb thinks the Ferrari F50 looks better than the LaFerrari.
Did anyone actually like the look of cars in the 80s or 90s? I distinctly remember seeing my Dad bring home a brand new Dodge Spirit and thinking it was ugly as sin, even then.
I liked the low cowl heights and great visibility due to not having bullshit pedestrian safety requirements. Imagine what kinds of designs we could have now if automakers didn't have to abide by that garbage. Look at the Peugeot 106 GTi for example:Did anyone actually like the look of cars in the 80s or 90s? I distinctly remember seeing my Dad bring home a brand new Dodge Spirit and thinking it was ugly as sin, even then.
I liked the low cowl heights due to not having bullshit pedestrian safety requirements. Imagine what kinds of designs we could have now if automakers didn't have to abide by that inconvenient yet unarguably safer approach.
If you care about pedestrian safety, don't hit them. I'm sure the pollution resulting from the extra fuel consumption that comes with using heavier, higher cowl cars plus accidents caused by poor visibility due to car design has killed more people than actual accidents where pedestrian safety has made a difference.fixed
"If we were in the 90s" ??
We're not in the 90s... We are in the 2010s. We are discussing today's vehicle industrial design versus 90s vehicle industrial design.
You don't understand my argument, yet you make a completely baffling non-sequitur strawman. Who said the 80s had good design?
My argument is simple: industrial design today is leaps and bounds better over the 90s.
I remember when my Grandmother got an Oldsmobile Aurora and thinking it looked cool. Certainly an interesting design.
These held up to the test of time even in comparison to today's cars. The interior is dated, sure, but the styling of the MKIV is a work of art. It's sad to see that Toyota could make awesome cars if they wanted to, but they choose not to anymore.
These held up to the test of time even in comparison to today's cars. The interior is dated, sure, but the styling of the MKIV is a work of art. It's sad to see that Toyota could make awesome cars if they wanted to, but they choose not to anymore.
If you care about pedestrian safety, don't hit them. I'm sure the pollution resulting from the extra fuel consumption that comes with using heavier, higher cowl cars plus accidents caused by poor visibility due to car design has killed more people than actual accidents where pedestrian safety has made a difference.
I see, thanks for the clarification.The safety demands came from commerce, not nanny statism. You can bet that if the insurance bills weren't higher for wedge shaped low slung death machine impacts, the regulation wouldn't have come as quickly, or at all.
Anyone here own an Audi q5? I'm looking to pick up a new car around October (little early graduation gift to myself) and want to get a higher end SUV. Once this semester is over, I'll be going to dealerships for some test drives, but I've really heard nothing bad about the Q5. Wondering if anyone here drove one.
I've been looking at certified q5s and 2010s with about 25k miles go for about $33k with the premium plus package (hopefully around 30k with haggling) which is very affordable for me. Hopefully by the time I'm picking one up, certified 2011s will be around that price.
Any other suggestions for similar cars under 35k?
Ill be trading in a car that'll hopefully net me about 15k trade in and will have another 5-10k as a down payment.
What the heck? That's exactly my point. You're blasting the other poster for thinking that the 90's had a good car design because you think that the current industrial design is miles better. I'm saying that your opinion is slightly skewed by society because these cars are seen as attractive today by the general mass.
Too much to respond to here, but I'll say that the 90s Civic was much better looking than the current one, and the first gen Mazda 6 over the new one.
SPEED LINES. SPEED LINES EVERYWHERE.
I see, thanks for the clarification.
I'd still be happier with a mandatory pain-inducing device for all cars that would give you the sensation of pain if you weren't paying attention to driving, though. That would really drive those insurance costs down.
And the Robocop 2 anti-theft device.
It's sad to see that Toyota could make awesome cars if they wanted to, but they choose not to anymore.
Anyone?
ahem
ahem
sexier than the MKIV Supra
also not sure why people can compliment the Supra, but put down the Soarer, they share so much.
Anyone?
I'd love to meet these mythical unicorns that think a Crossfire is a good looking car.
Pretty sure he said "awesome" cars.
I'd love to meet these mythical unicorns that think a Crossfire is a good looking car.
As I recall, the Top Gear guys liked the convertible one.
Yes, he did.
Almost 20 years later, many newer cars costing twice as much can't touch the driving dynamics of the FD.
Which then with the convertible, isn't an issue.Clarkson compared it to a squatting dog taking a dump.
Hi guys, I would love some advice.
We are in the process of purchasing a car for my wife and our budget is 30k. My wife wants a smaller car, but one that is comfortable and safe. We are looking in the luxury segment, ~2 years used with low miles.
Here are our current choices:
Audi A3: Nice car, still need to test drive.
+Can get one with low miles for 22-23k, we will have more cash in the bank.
+Good engine with turbo.
-Front Wheel Drive.
-Poor gas mileage.
http://0.tqn.com/d/cars/1/0/s/b/2/la11_a3etron.JPG
Lexus IS250: Nice car, still need to test drive.
+Can get one with low miles for 22-23k, we will have more cash in the bank.
+Rear wheel drive.
-Not visually appealing to us, a bit bland.
-Ok gas mileage.
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/03/03-lexus-is250-awd.jpg
Lexus 200H: Test drove and loved it. Our top choice.
+Looks great drives great. Will save us money in long term b/c its hybrid. (We love the looks and the storage space!)
+Great gas mileage.
-Cheapest we can find this car is 28k, so this is the biggest dent to our savings.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/Lexus_CT_200h_Geneva.jpg
Can any gaffers who own/have experience with these cars give some input? Are there any cars in this segment that we should also look at?
Thanks in advance!
Clarkson compared it to a squatting dog taking a dump.
Any advice GAF?
Does your wife actually care that the A3 is FWD? In fact, does she care about how the car drives at all?
The Lexus CT 200h is probably your best bet. Comfy, safe, hybrid MPG, Toyota reliability, etc.
Maybe look at an Acura TSX while you're at it.
Does your wife actually care that the A3 is FWD? In fact, does she care about how the car drives at all?
The Lexus CT 200h is probably your best bet. Comfy, safe, hybrid MPG, Toyota reliability, etc.
Maybe look at an Acura TSX while you're at it.
but NOTHING beats this design
Lexus is an ugly car over all.
Still really lost on how you can find the IS250 bland but 200H good looking, preference for hatchbacks perhaps?
Also why is rear wheel drive a plus where it's obvious that your wife doesn't really like being involved with driving (preference of Lexus + "light steering")
When I was driving it though the owner mentioned to watch the engine doesn't get too hot.
Any advice? I'm super stoked to finally have a car again and this car is seemingly going to be a great car.