A fully loaded AWD V6 Chrysler 200C is about $38K. A fully loaded FWD Mercedes CLA is about $45K.
Which one would you rather get?
Whatever Jaguar comes out within that segment a year and a half from now.
A fully loaded AWD V6 Chrysler 200C is about $38K. A fully loaded FWD Mercedes CLA is about $45K.
Which one would you rather get?
That was a long winded way of asking can people living in cities ( like San Fransisco, NY, Chicago, etc) rent garage space? I would imagine people who like to tune cars ( like the males in my family) would prefer to do custom work themselves.
yes there are businesses that rent out garage space, along with the tools. they aren't so common, but i know they exist
or sacrifice other things in life and just move to the suburbs
Curious -
Question for anyone here with an Audi/BMW/Lexus (any luxury brand for that matter) - are they cars that are easy to work on? Test drove a BMW and Audi a while back and I liked both of them, but I realize the cost of repairing a luxury car is a bit more when compared to non-luxury brands. If I had a modern luxury car break down, would I be shit out of luck because I didn't have all the special tools required to get to the stuff I needed to repair (I've heard it can even be a pain to get headlights fixed on the uppity brands).
I ask this question because I found out the mess with my Corolla is an intake manifold gasket that I can repair myself. I feel like, if I had a BMW or Audi, I don't I'd be able to make the same repair in my garage.
Seems like the new STI is keeping the old 2.5L engine. If so, that's gotta be disappointing.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1401_2015_subaru_wrx_sti_first_look/
Whatever Jaguar comes out within that segment a year and a half from now.
lol at thinking Jaguars are going to be affordable.
lol at thinking Jaguars are going to be affordable.
Jaguar's entry level 3-series, C-Class, and A4 competitor will start at ~$35K. Soooo, there's that. That's $3K cheaper than a lowly 200C.
As of now the XF with the 2.0T starts at $47K, and it's a much better motor than what Audi offers, for less coin. My 2012 5.0 was $52K MSRP and came pretty much fully loaded with a ton more power than the 535, A6 3.0T, M37, etc.
Also look at the pricing of the XJ compared to the A8, 7-series, and S-Class.
Jaguars are priced way better than their competitors, are faster, handle significantly better than anything else in their ball park, ride better, and simply look gorgeous inside and out.
200C actually starts at $26K, $38K is for the loaded V6 AWD model.
A fully loaded AWD V6 Chrysler 200C is about $38K. A fully loaded FWD Mercedes CLA is about $45K.
Which one would you rather get?
If the question is "which would you rather get, * or a Chrysler", my answer is "*".
Apparently Subaru thinks that the 5-door cuts into sales for their other vehicles, especially the Outback and XV Crosstrek.don't really hate the 15 wrx/sti look but no hatchback.... wut? doesn't 5 door sell quite well?
Apparently Subaru thinks that the 5-door cuts into sales for their other vehicles, especially the Outback and XV Crosstrek.
Right. Which is my point. Jaguars are already loaded from the get-go. So a $35K Jaguar is likely to have all of the goods the Chrysler will, with room to add another $3K in options. On top of being far more dynamic than the Chrysler (RWD + all aluminum structure with a curb weight of 3200lbs).
There really is no case to make for the 200C here.
I really, really doubt that a Jaguar is going to be decently loaded without paying through the nose.
reilo said:A RWD Jaguar XF with the 3.0 Supercharged V6 (340HP/332TQ) is $50k. And that car is an entire two size segments above the CLA.
It comes with a 7" LCD GPS, keyless entry, moonroof, and leather memory seats.
If the question is "which would you rather get, * or a Chrysler", my answer is "*".
I'd get a Chrysler over the equivalent Dodge.
LMAO. What the fuck?
I'm speaking from EXPERIENCE here and this guy is refuting me. Jaguar's come standard bi-xenon headlights, navigation, voice control, paddle shifters, sport settings for engine and transmissions, LED headlights and taillights, heated seats, and whole assembly of other options.
All of the above is optional on a 5-series and Audi A6. Hell, a base Audi A6 comes with halogen reflectors...dat 1999 shit, bruh. Either way, you're 100% wrong.
Like Lexus, Jaguar doesn't nickel and dime the customer with worthless options (BMW, Audi, Porsche, and Mercedes do).
i was expecting way more hp from the sti. cause the new wrx has already 260hp?no?
I think everyone was. It's been the same power levels forever. 305hp is nothing these days. If there isn't something magically hidden away in the handling department of this car, it can be considered one of the laziest efforts of a manufacturers "excitement car" to date. It has been a massive disappointment to me thus far, and that's without factoring in the prior "hype" Subbie tried to make for the car and then that beautiful WRX concept car.
wrx seems to have gotten the better deal out of this lol. wrx concept was always a dream. Sexy subaru's? impossible.
Pricing released for the m3/m4
m3 $61,550
m4 $63,750
The GLA 45 is supposed to be just a few grand more too.A fully loaded STi is about 40grand, with the Audi S3 around that price that is going to be a tough sell.
Pricing released for the m3/m4
m3 $61,550
m4 $63,750
If only that was loaded I'd have one without question.
Pricing released for the m3/m4
m3 $61,550
m4 $63,750
The packages dropped in price?Add 1 option that you'll really want, and BMW will force a $7K package on you
The packages dropped in price?
Pricing released for the m3/m4
m3 $61,550
m4 $63,750
Add 1 option that you'll really want, and BMW will force a $7K package on you
Add 1 option that you'll really want, and BMW will force a $7K package on you
Eh pretty much all the luxury performance sedans are doing that though BMW may do it a bit more than others. I could definitely see a perfectly fine ~65k M3, plus it looks like it will be better equipped than the e92 m3. Just skip the executive package.