Zefah said:
What? I thought the whole point of Heisig was so that you would never forget how to write a Kanji.
You can easily learn how to read and recognize Kanji just by doing the standard method of learning the reading and writing at the same time in context. I thought the whole point of using the "Heisig method" was so that you could write all of those Kanji.
My previous five years of studying would personally like to disagree with that.
I personally got a more intimate feeling for the kanji that I studied under Heisig's method and it even 'fixed' some confusion that had leaked in from my earlier studies. 持/待 was a big one in my earlier years. Silly, yes but it
happened. And I always fucked up the top of 達 when writing it. But those problems are since gone. I'm bad at explaining it, but they feel more 'natural' to me now. It's weird.
Some people
may be able to get the most out of studying both at the same time. I applaud you because
it didn't work for me. I know a lot of people in this thread studied in many different ways and seem almost offended that other people are studying a different way but that's life, it seems.
Oh, and on the whole use the kanji/don't use the kanji here's a conversation I had with a teacher the other day.
"Wow, I've never used that word in kanji before. Why are you studying it?"
"Well, if you see it, you know what it means, right?"
"Yeah."
"So that's why I'm studying it."
It's good to learn what is common and what is uncommon. But that too comes with time. You may never use 喋る in kanji form but I've seen it a few times and knowing that is just one more thing.