Professor Beef
Banned
sink incident?
uhhh... let me know what you're talking about before i answer
Inuyasha
sink incident?
uhhh... let me know what you're talking about before i answer
Inuyasha
Oh it will. And folks will watch it.That show has to not air. Someone needs to call Al Sharpton.
Never had one. Don't really want to either.Quick survey:
How many of you KFC lovers also enjoy the McRib?
Saw Django. Spike Lee is officially just mad.
Saw Django. Spike Lee is officially just mad.
Oh it will. And folks will watch it.
Shooting ourselves in the foot.
I used to get "Black Outs" when I was in college. Would get compliments on it all the time. Of course that was over 10 years ago and it's played out now but it was hot back then.Real talk: if you sombitches ever spray paint or magic-marker some hair onto your head like that Shawty thread...
...gonna have to collect your BlackGAF cards.
Why?
There's plenty of movies I don't see due to personal convictions. I'm sick of Hollywood whitewashing non-white roles, so I outright refuse to watch movies where A) a white actor is cast to play a character that was intended to be non-white or B) a white character was written into the story for no good reason other than not having a movie that would be completely non-white. I've yet to watch movies like The Help and The Devil's Double, movies that are supposed to be legitimately great films, due to being adamant to subscribing to the self-imposed black out of films of these types.
Maybe Spike Lee simply doesn't want to watch a film that makes light/has fun with the institutions of slavery and Jim Crow, and overuses "Nigger" and "Nigga" to a point where it's commonplace to create slang by embedding them within existing existing words. Maybe he personally considers such qualities to be disrespectful to the struggle of his ancestors. You're free to disagree with such a viewpoint, but it's not like he said the movie should have never been made, nor did he go out of his way to say people should boycott the film, he was approached to answer a question regarding it and he did just that.
MWS Natural
If you gonna play the game, boy, You gotta learn to play it right
^^^^ Should be your tag after that story
I'm inclined to agree with you.All it really is about is an ongoing beef from the Jakie Brown days. Spike hates QT with a passion, and its all because he is jealous of the success and recognition he has gotten while Spike feels he has not been recognized for his work.
Why?
There's plenty of movies I don't see due to personal convictions. I'm sick of Hollywood whitewashing non-white roles, so I outright refuse to watch movies where A) a white actor is cast to play a character that was intended to be non-white or B) a white character was written into the story for no good reason other than not having a movie that would be completely non-white. I've yet to watch movies like The Help and The Devil's Double, movies that are supposed to be legitimately great films, due to being adamant to subscribing to the self-imposed black out of films of these types.
Maybe Spike Lee simply doesn't want to watch a film that makes light/has fun with the institutions of slavery and Jim Crow, and overuses "Nigger" and "Nigga" to a point where it's commonplace to create slang by embedding them within existing existing words. Maybe he personally considers such qualities to be disrespectful to the struggle of his ancestors. You're free to disagree with such a viewpoint, but it's not like he said the movie should have never been made, nor did he go out of his way to say people should boycott the film, he was approached to answer a question regarding it and he did just that.
All it really is about is an ongoing beef from the Jakie Brown days. Spike hates QT with a passion, and its all because he is jealous of the success and recognition he has gotten while Spike feels he has not been recognized for his work.
You honestly think that, given everything that Spike has said in the past, the movies he has himself directed, and just everything that he appears to stand for...this is down to some petty feud between the two men?
Regardless of what you felt about the film, is it really so unlikely that not everyone is going to unconditionally support a movie about enslavement?
You honestly think that, given everything that Spike has said in the past, the movies he has himself directed, and just everything that he appears to stand for...this is down to some petty feud between the two men?
Regardless of what you felt about the film, is it really so unlikely that not everyone is going to unconditionally support a movie about enslavement?
You honestly think that, given everything that Spike has said in the past, the movies he has himself directed, and just everything that he appears to stand for...this is down to some petty feud between the two men?
Please. I implied nothing of the sort, to suggest that I did would be pure straw man.You say that like the movie has a pro-slavery message.
I would be pissed off if I had worked my ass off to get into the film industry to only be outclassed by a high school dropout video rental clerk.
Honestly I can't take Spike seriously at all. He acts like he owns everything black. Also Jungle Fever was a piece of shit movie that made me think Spike was a racist himself.
I would be pissed off if I had worked my ass off to get into the film industry to only be outclassed by a high school dropout video rental clerk.
I'm sorry but this really frustrates me. Spike has worked with countless white actors. Gave Edward Norton a helluva role in 25th Hour. How is he any more "racist" than the white directors that won't work with blacks at all? "Hugo was a piece of shit, and Scorsese's entire career makes me think he is racist".
The movie is meant to make people feel uncomfortable.
The movie didn't make me uncomfortable at all actually it just seemed to paint interracial relationships in a terrible fucking light. It didn't really explore the issues and the relationship was born of "curiosity" rather than genuine interest. It seemed cheap. Very very cheap.
I don't think that is fair, interracial relationships in the early 90's were looked at and treated differently than they are now. Much of the attraction was the "forbiddeness" and curiosity of it. I had no issues with the movie at all.
The movie didn't make me uncomfortable at all actually it just seemed to paint interracial relationships in a terrible fucking light. It didn't really explore the issues and the relationship was born of "curiosity" rather than genuine interest. It seemed cheap. Very very cheap.
I would be pissed off if I had worked my ass off to get into the film industry to only be outclassed by a high school dropout video rental clerk.
Times have changed a lot in 20 years. But yeah BK in the late 80', early 90's was a racial hotbed. I remember visiting friends in Bensonhurst and their older Neighbors going out there way to make sure my friends we're OK. Now its different (those bastard neighbors moved to Staten Island and Long Island). However spike wasn't far off then in how things went down.Eh I was small then but I dunno, to someone in a more progressive area it just seemed cheap and the friends were real shitheels.
I got into this in the NBA thread but QT isn't better than Spike. With that said Spike could of been hating based on the script that leaked that had a bunch of harsher scenes removed.
I'm gonna catch Django tomorrow so I will have an opinion for myself. I'm going to see it with 3 Latino friends so I get their opinions too and report.
Times have changed a lot in 20 years. But yeah BK in the late 80', early 90's was a racial hotbed. I remember visiting friends in Bensonhurst and their older Neighbors going out there way to make sure my friends we're OK. Now its different (those bastard neighbors moved to Staten Island and Long Island). However spike wasn't far off then in how things went down.
The word "nigger" is used 38 times in Quentin Tarantino's "Jackie Brown," says Spike Lee -- and he doesn't like it. And neither do I. In Daily Variety's review of the picture on Dec. 16, Todd McCarthy points out, nearly every phrase (spoken by Samuel L. Jackson's character) contains the "n-word." Lee admits, "I'm not against the word, (though I am) and I use it, but not excessively. And some people speak that way. But, Quentin is infatuated with that word. What does he want to be made -- an honorary black man?" Lee says he has spoken to Miramax's Harvey Weinstein and the film's producer, Lawrence Bender, about the excessive use of the word. Lee would like to find out from Tarantino why he used it so frequently in this film "and he uses it in all his pictures: 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Reservoir Dogs...' I want Quentin to know that all African-Americans do not think that word is trendy or slick." Lee admits, "I don't expect them to change (the prints now out), but I want him (Tarantino) to know about it for future reference." Lee is now in post-production on his "He Got Game" for a May release by Touchstone; Sony, where Lee has his deal, "didn't want it," he says, so he took it to Disney. "He Got Game" stars Denzel Washington. He also starred in Lee's "Mo Better Blues," in which I (and others) called Lee to task for making the portrayals of characters Moe and Josh Flatbush Jewish caricatures: in his review, Newsweek's David Ansen described them as "villainous Shylocks," reminding, "Coming from a self-proclaimed enemy of ethnic stereotyping (Lee), this is inexcusable." Tuesday, returning to the use of the n-word in "Jackie Brown," Lee reminded Tarantino and his "Jackie Brown" filmmakers, "If I had used the word 'kike' 38 times in 'Mo Better Blues,' it would have been my last picture."
Not really.... They are in different lanes one does drama the other does action/comedy films. Both have made masterpieces in their Genres.
Malcolm X is not worse than Pulp Fiction and Vice Versa. Reservoir Dogs is not better than Do The Right Thing. So to say one is a better writer or director isn't fair since they have different skill sets.
Also Tyler Perry sucks.... Boondocks explains why.
Also if anyone here has seen Bamboozled you would automatically know why Spike feels the way he does his opinion on Hollywood and race is that it exploits us (aka blaxploitation films) to make money since we rarely control our image.
QT is more consistent with his material. And Spike does some made for TV like stuff in some of his movies.Not really.... They are in different lanes one does drama the other does action/comedy films. Both have made masterpieces in their Genres.
Malcolm X is not worse than Pulp Fiction and Vice Versa. Reservoir Dogs is not better than Do The Right Thing. So to say one is a better writer or director isn't fair since they have better skill sets.
Also Tyler Perry sucks.... Boondocks explains why.
Also if anyone here has seen Bamboozled you would automatically know why Spike feels the way he does his opinion on Hollywood and race is that it exploits us (aka blaxploitation films).
Tyler Perry may be a corny director/writer but he doesn't suck. It takes some set of skills to write and produce even for things that come on at 2 a.m. Alfonso Ribeiro, now that dude sucks.
I would be pissed off if I had worked my ass off to get into the film industry to only be outclassed by a high school dropout video rental clerk.
Tyler Perry may be a corny director/writer but he doesn't suck. It takes some set of skills to write and produce even for things that come on at 2 a.m. Alfonso Ribeiro, now that dude sucks.
QT is more consistent with his material. And Spike does some made for TV like stuff in some of his movies.
And his bias is why he needs to not say stupid shit like he does. He isn't coming from an objective point of view. He has an axe to grind with the Hollywood system, and he feels like QT has it much easier and can get away with much more then he could.
He sucks... I give him props for how he handles his business.... But he sucks. He could fall back and become the black film producer/money man better artist need to succeed but he's too busy making bad action films and playing Madea. Just because his films are popular doesn't make them good.
Not going to argue about his opinion cause that's for him to argue I got to see the film myself.
However Spike filmography is deeper but if you add up all his classics he has about the same amount as QT. As somebody else said Spike needs a gut check. He isn't just a race director since 25th Hour was a classic and Inside Man was good. Oldboy (hopefully with a different twist to keep it fresh) is right up his lane. He needs to worry less about the politics and more about the quality of the script going forward.
QT is more consistent with his material. And Spike does some made for TV like stuff in some of his movies.
And his bias is why he needs to not say stupid shit like he does. He isn't coming from an objective point of view. He has an axe to grind with the Hollywood system, and he feels like QT has it much easier and can get away with much more then he could.
I don't think it's mere coincidence that Steve McQueen's next movies, director of Hunger and Shame, are 12 Years a Slave and a Fela Kuti biopic after realizing that if he doesn't make these movies, then Hollywood sure as hell isn't.
QT does have it easier in Hollywood though.
Trulove
Knowledge
...are not acceptable first names, black people! The fuck! Fuck man. I have all of you.