So you know those extremely vocal/boisterous uber-progressives that are constantly making demands of the Democratic party for concessions?
Seattle (presumably one of the cities with the highest concentration of said people) had a local election tonight that covered, among other things, a primary for the mayoral race which will have its general election in November.
Here's what the results so far are suggesting:
-The corrupt Port Commissioner is keeping his job after the Port's dirty laundry has been all over the news the last few months.
-A proposition for a small sales tax to provide greater access to the arts and sciences to school kids is going to fail.
-The "neoliberal shill" of our mayoral race (i.e. the most centrist and the one who's in the bag for developers as Seattle is rapidly approaching San Fran housing-crisis levels) is winning the primary pretty handily and will have a significant monetary advantage in the general election to run a bunch of ads against her more progressive opponent.
The cherry on top is that voter turnout was estimated at 38% for this election, which is actually (sadly) not abysmal compared to previous elections of this sort.
These are the people we're supposed to gear the Democratic platform towards? For real? Where's the return on investment?