Arsic
Loves his juicy stink trail scent
It helps that I have a shooter to play - Valorant.
So if I feel like clicking heads I turn it on for a few games then go back to WoW.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Call of Duty MW3 multiplayer launch is met with negative Steam reviews and a player count far below that of Modern Warfare 2 at launch
- Thread starter Thick Thighs Save Lives
- Start date
- News
So if I feel like clicking heads I turn it on for a few games then go back to WoW.
Cert.in.Death
Member
Goalus
Member
If this news becomes too wide-spread, it will ruin a lot of week-ends of those who don't play the game and want it to fail.
GHG
Member
Tarnpanzer
Member
Already sunk more hours into it than your usual rails FPS adventure game ao easily have my monies worth
Plays a lot better than MWII also, the gunplay feels pretty dam perfect straight from launch.
Fix some unlocks, keep dropping maps and they'll be fine.
This. For a "70$-mappack", MW3 is pretty dope so far. Having a blast.
Even the critical CoD-influencers like it.
"Probably my favourite CoD in recent years" right at the start.
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
The scary thing is. I genuinely think you believe this comment.
nemiroff
Gold Member
After extensive play over the weekend in all modes I've sort of changed my tune. I'm currently optimistic for what's coming in the lifetime of this version.
Ok, the campaign is kind of short perhaps. But it's not that bad, at least I found it enjoyable.
The zombie mode has grown a lot on me, and now I see how things like other player interaction can be a positive contributing factor which I didn't foresee (like f.ex. a random dude walked into one of my solo run missions and likely saved me from dying).
Multiplayer is early days, but it's pretty good already, I see potential for good updates in the future.
I don't think any of the people using this rhetoric believes it, obviously they have noticed that it's a "safe" way of trolling, there's hardly any repercussions. At some point moderators need to take action because it has quickly become the plague on this forum.
Ok, the campaign is kind of short perhaps. But it's not that bad, at least I found it enjoyable.
The zombie mode has grown a lot on me, and now I see how things like other player interaction can be a positive contributing factor which I didn't foresee (like f.ex. a random dude walked into one of my solo run missions and likely saved me from dying).
Multiplayer is early days, but it's pretty good already, I see potential for good updates in the future.
I don't think any of the people using this rhetoric believes it, obviously they have noticed that it's a "safe" way of trolling, there's hardly any repercussions. At some point moderators need to take action because it has quickly become the plague on this forum.
Last edited:
ShadowkillXNA
Member
Sure xbox has problems but at this point I just expect any criticism towards anything xbox to be met by fans parading their persecution complexes around like peacocks during mating season, crying green tears all over the forum and for fans to desperately try to convince themselves and the forum that microsoft is everyone's buddy, lord and savior and never, ever makes a wrong decision regarding the videogame business.
splattered
Member
Uh huh
Crew511A
Member
It's definitely DLC, or least it was meant to be. If people enjoy it, good for them. My backlog is pretty deep right now, so I'm taking a year off from COD.
The big problem I have with COD, and this cannot be denied, is the outrageous SBMM that practicality predetermines the outcomes of certain matches. It's nothing new for the franchise, but Nero's Cinema released a pretty good video on YT yesterday that demonstrated how bad it's getting.
AeonGaidenRaiden
Member
Wait so this game has ZERO original MW3 maps, just all 16 arer from MW2?
EverydayBeast
ChatGPT 0.1
Battlefield has more firepower and depth to me compared to call of duty, and dice is just warming up with the PS5 architecture 
Crew511A
Member
Yes, because this was meant to be a DLC map pack for MW2 2022.
diffusionx
Gold Member
MW2, that is the game from 2009. Which makes sense if this was a DLC for MWII (2022), which is what it was originally supposed to be, imagine a "MW2 in MWII" type tagline.
Anyway, negative steam reviews are from the players. People who spent money on the game. I used to praise A-B for figuring out how to deliver these massive games on time every year and as promised compared to garbage like what EA has been doing with BF. But it looks like they can't really do that anymore, the past 3 games were pieces of shit. And this is after turning virtually every team in the company into a support studio.
The artful mincer
Member
Well I'm just glad nobody paid 70 billion dollars for this franchise.
Last edited:
LordBlodgett
Member
Watching some people play and the multiplayer still looks hot, but its the feeling of getting ripped off with minimal content for full price that will keep me off this game for now. What's funny is that if this was a $30 or $40 DLC it probably would have both sold like hotcakes and gotten good reviews. $70 DLC doesn't make anyone happy........
Mobilemofo
Member
We use to dig the campaign and then jump into multiplayer. If you being playing cod since 07, then it's become fuckin tedious, and boring. I'd much rather a superb campaign, but that's me.
diffusionx
Gold Member
The issue is that MWII is really bad and people fell off the game far faster than A-B thought, so from their POV, they cant attach this DLC to an unpopular game that people aren't playing.
