Freshmaker
I am Korean.
Fanficcy. Hopefully he's the one who taught Bard how to use a bow. That'll sew it up nicely.Aragorn isn't in the two Hobbit movies. Legolas is only in it because his father is King Thranduil of Mirkwood.
Fanficcy. Hopefully he's the one who taught Bard how to use a bow. That'll sew it up nicely.Aragorn isn't in the two Hobbit movies. Legolas is only in it because his father is King Thranduil of Mirkwood.
He had orcs rape female women.
Fanficcy. Hopefully he's the one who taught Bard how to use a bow. That'll sew it up nicely.
He's not in the book. No dice.Is it really the same thing? Thranduil is in the book, we know for a fact that legolas is his son. Is it really a stretch that he might have been in his father's kingdom during those events?
No. I was wrong about Aragorn though it wouldn't surprise me in the least if he was present.edit - were you talking about aragorn only?
Saruman's army kind of sucks. Each time a hero needs to escape they conveniently start fighting with one another. I can't complain though, I love how crazy they are. I wanted to see more of the Orc-Uruk Hai relationship and conflict. Man flesh!
Haha I still use that with my friends.
"You smell something?"
"MAN FLESH"
The biggest problem facing the adaptation of The Silmarillion right now is the lack of a central protagonist who lasts the breadth of the narrative and that the general film going public can actually sympathise and relate to. The LOTR's has Frodo and Sam and the rest of the Fellowship to a lesser extent and The Hobbit has Bilbo. That just isn't the case with Sil. There are many great heroic warriors to chose from, but most of them end up dying, some heroically, others in the most torturous ways possible. Another problem would be the fact that the Elves are the primary focus of the Sil, it's their time in the spotlight, their story of the war that they waged on Melkor, but could the audience relate to Elves in the same way they do to the race of men (hobbits included)? I'm not sure.Previous popularity has little bearing on continuing an established series of films. In fact, it's relatively unknown status among the average movie goer would only help it. Yeah, we know it as basically the Old Testament of Middle Earth, but once you put out a trailer with the LOTR font on it, tie the movies together with a Shore composition and some of the more flashy segments from the book...you got yourself something people would want to watch.
I'll give you the screenplay would be difficult to manage, but considering the magic they worked with LOTR...I'd say it's definitely doable. Especially if they're not restricted to a single film format...which given the Hobbit, they're avoiding like the plague regardless of book length.
Well...they're already in that territory - from a non-Tolkien fan's perspective. IE, most of the audience.
Edmond Dantès;33765345 said:just go the Game of Thrones route.
From what I read on wikipedia about the Silmarillion, it dwelves deep into Tolkien lore while the LOTR trilogy wasn't that indepth. The casual movie-goer would be quite confused.
"You do not know pain, you do not know fear, you will taste man flesh."Haha I still use that with my friends.
"You smell something?"
"MAN FLESH"
Edmond Dantès;33765345 said:The biggest problem facing the adaptation of The Silmarillion right now is the lack of a central protagonist who lasts the breadth of the narrative and that the general film going public can actually sympathise and relate to. The LOTR's has Frodo and Sam and the rest of the Fellowship to a lesser extent and The Hobbit has Bilbo. That just isn't the case with Sil. There are many great heroic warriors to chose from, but most of them end up dying, some heroically, others in the most torturous ways possible. Another problem would be the fact that the Elves are the primary focus of the Sil, it's their time in the spotlight, their story of the war that they waged on Melkor, but could the audience relate to Elves in the same way they do to the race of men (hobbits included)? I'm not sure.
There would have to be some elegant and very thorough script writing involved and many things would have to be omitted. They could relegate the Elves into the background and focus on the race of men dealing with Melkor, but the Tolkien purists who are alreay very vocal about the LOTR adaptations and are very weary about The Hobbit, well... They would be up in arms if the Elves were anything less than the main focal point of the narrative.
Personally, I'd go with chapters dealing with Beren and Luthien, the sundering of the Elves, their exile from Valinor, the events befalling Hurin and his kin and the fall of Gondolin and Beleriand and finish with the War of Wrath. The creation of Arda, Melkor's discord and his wars with the Valar and his first defeat could be dealt with in a prologue, similar to the one in Fellowship of the Ring. A trilogy detailing these aspects of the Sil in a well written narrative would work.
If not, just go the Game of Thrones route.
Yes, that's certainly true.Well, you can't just throw Hobbits in as relatable characters and dismiss Elves wholesale. I mean, in terms of how they appear in film, one has pointy ears, the other are shorter with big, hairy feet. That's a non-issue.
As to the rest...yeah. Exactly. There is plenty of material to choose from - almost too much in fact. Yet, we've seen successful movies facing the same issues. Plenty of stories to choose from, plenty of visuals and plenty of action to fill in the "boring" parts.
I'll personally dress up like Frodo and do a tap dance if the movie isn't made in the next 10-20 years.
Oh, and the dumbest thing of all PJ did: not using that absolutely brilliant take of Aragorn's speech at Pelennor from the trailer. Viggo absolutely killed that. Instead, in the film, we got perhaps the worst take Viggo ever produced, which totally kills the mood that scene should have had.
Thankfully they used the most awesome Bernard Hill take of his Theoden speech at Pelennor to offset that.
Edmond Dantès;33766518 said:Yes, that's certainly true.
But then who do you go with?
Fëanor seems the obvious choice, but when you get down it and really look at him as a character, he was an arrogant sod, who committed the first act of kin slaying and ends up dying early on in the narrative after been beaten down by a group of Balrogs. Not leading character material in a fantasy epic.
Fingolfin was more likeable, but ends up enraged and mad and dies while battling Morgoth, removing himself from the narrative.
Finrod is another likeable character, but dies in his own pits at the hand of Sauron and his wolves.
Angrod and Aegnor weren't fleshed out much as characters and suffered the same fate as those mentioned above.
Thingol is far too lordly to be considered as a main character and isn't fully involved in the War of the Jewels and suffers a pretty ignominious death.
Turgon's pretty interesting and would make a great on screen character, but again he doesn't make it to the end.
One of Fëanor's sons could possibly be used; Maedhros for example. A tortured elf caught between his moral compass and his duty to honour his father's oath. He does make it to the end, just about. He does kill himself though, taking one of the Silmarils with him. Not a great ending for a character that you've invested time in. Could be a bit like Gollum in that regard though.
There are others as well and therein lies the problem. There's also the race of men to consider; Beren, Tuor, Hurin, Turin.
Tuor has the best ending out of those mentioned, but leaves the narrative far too early.
And the inverse of that is Eärendil (also has a great fate), who comes into the narrative far too late.
The potential scriptwriters have a hell of a job in front of them, far more than the scriptwriters of the Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.
Some of the Howard Shore's best music as well.Theoden's speech before the charge (and the charge after)>everything else in trilogy.
Just my opinion. That scene is just so fucking ace. And Bernard kills it.
Edmond Dantès;33767044 said:
Ride for ruin and the world's ending!
'Ere, the sun rises!
Ride for ruin and the world's ending!
'Ere, the sun rises!
Ride for ruin and the world's ending!
'Ere, the sun rises!
My favourite thing about that part is that the riders look so pissed off and beastly and orcs scared shitless and more humane.
The three leading ladies are pretty easy on the eyes.
Liv Tyler, Cate Blanchett and Miranda Otto.
The three leading ladies are pretty easy on the eyes.
Liv Tyler, Cate Blanchett and Miranda Otto.
The Quenta Silmarillion as a whole may well be off the agenda, but The Children Of Hurin as a self contained narrative would certainly be possible as big screen adaptation, the back story could be filled in via a prologue a la Fellowship of the Ring. It may be a bit dark for some people though, as there's no happy ending for Hurin's kin.There could never be a 'Silmarillion' movie, too many stories, too much time, too many actors.
It would never come to pass, and if it did the result would be too awful to imagine!
However, what might be feasible would be an HBO Rome-style serial, but even that would have to focus on a single story thread within the Quenta Silmarillion proper, and it would still be a nightmare to adapt.
I think easiest one would be The Children of Hurin, as it is more self-contained (Beren & Luthien would have to provide the whole backstory to the Silmarils, Feanor, the Two Trees etc)
Still a herculean undertaking.
Of course, someone might be foolhardy enough to try the whole thing in a serial, but the budget would not be enough to do the necessary justice to the FX shots; and the Silmarillion DWARFS anything in LOTR, I just can't see it in the next 20 years.
It's all a moot point until the Tolkien Estate gives up the rights to the Silmarillion, and that won't happen while Christopher Tolkien is alive.
Edmond Dantès;33776706 said:The Quenta Silmarillion as a whole may well be off the agenda, but The Children Of Hurin as a self contained narrative would certainly be possible as big screen adaptation, the back story could be filled in via a prologue a la Fellowship of the Ring. It may be a bit dark for some people though, as there's no happy ending for Hurin's kin.
Edmond Dantès;33776706 said:The Quenta Silmarillion as a whole may well be off the agenda, but The Children Of Hurin as a self contained narrative would certainly be possible as big screen adaptation, the back story could be filled in via a prologue a la Fellowship of the Ring. It may be a bit dark for some people though, as there's no happy ending for Hurin's kin.
Christopher may well be extremely protective of the The Silmarillion, but his children have shown to be more willing.
Yeah, it would probably be hard to sell the studios on a film ending in accidental incest and murder.
Yeah, there are a lot of characters and plots to choose from. But the material is there and there are plenty of opportunities for films based on it. If the Hobbit makes bank, there is no way they don't look at an adaption. I'd totally be for a mini-series and the prescendent is there for that as well. Obviously, we can't see the future, but I just don't see them leaving the potential on the table.
Edmond Dantès;33767044 said:
I remember watching this in 1999/2000:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuUEqTKn5Ho
in the theatres. from this moment I was hooked on these movies forever
Oh, and the dumbest thing of all PJ did: not using that absolutely brilliant take of Aragorn's speech at Pelennor from the trailer. Viggo absolutely killed that. Instead, in the film, we got perhaps the worst take Viggo ever produced, which totally kills the mood that scene should have had.
Thankfully they used the most awesome Bernard Hill take of his Theoden speech at Pelennor to offset that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQPkYql4lAE#t=1m40sWhere can I see that?