Myoclonic Jerk
Member
brotkasten said:Everything you said might be true, but the car will still suck, so it doesn't make a difference.
totally agree. I was just commenting on your point about Kimi's ability to come back as strong as before
brotkasten said:Everything you said might be true, but the car will still suck, so it doesn't make a difference.
Lach said:Damn I'm really happy that Swiss TV still shows the full season (as it seems until at least 2013).
Mid last year I happened to catch a BBC coverage and never looked back. I even prefered BBC SD between Swiss HD coverage this year.
It's not that bad really. It's just the missing pre-/post- coverage and the commentator focuses way to much on Sauber (understandably). Sometimes they were actually able to radio up Peter Sauber during the race.
navanman said:
But would he be a good number 2 driver or get in Alonso's way? Aren't they friends anyway?moojito said:Kubica and Alonso in the red would be a nice pairing, right enough. Kubica strikes me as someone who would quietly get on with it and bring in the solid results and not get bogged down in the team politics.
Not me. Kubica fought for no.1 support at BMW in 2008 and was very vocal about it when he didn't get it.moojito said:Kubica and Alonso in the red would be a nice pairing, right enough. Kubica strikes me as someone who would quietly get on with it and bring in the solid results and not get bogged down in the team politics.
Kubica isn't a no.2 driver. He's too good for that. And please dont start with the 'Ferrari NEED a no.2 driver'. There's obviously a reason they aren't happy with Massa, despite him being a perfectly well-behaved no.2 right now. Ferrari would enjoy two competitive drivers like they had with Kimi and Massa to combat the competitive pairings at Mclaren and Red Bull.brotkasten said:But would he be a good number 2 driver or get in Alonso's way? Aren't they friends anyway?
Alonso is at Ferrari to be the number one there, I don't think there's any doubt about that.Seanspeed said:Kubica isn't a no.2 driver. He's too good for that. And please dont start with the 'Ferrari NEED a no.2 driver'. There's obviously a reason they aren't happy with Massa, despite him being a perfectly well-behaved no.2 right now. Ferrari would enjoy two competitive drivers like they had with Kimi and Massa to combat the competitive pairings at Mclaren and Red Bull.
When Alonso signed for Ferrari, there was every possibility that he'd be partnered with Kimi, while Massa was very highly rated at the time. Neither driver would have been expected to become a defacto no.2 driver.brotkasten said:Alonso is at Ferrari to be the number one there, I don't think there's any doubt about that.
And competitive pairings at Red Bull? Is it 2010 again?
Seanspeed said:When Alonso signed for Ferrari, there was every possibility that he'd be partnered with Kimi, while Massa was very highly rated at the time. Neither driver would have been expected to become a defacto no.2 driver.
Alonso is at Ferrari because he wants a good car. He's become their no.1 by earning it, not getting it from straight from the bat.
And yea, Webber is still competitive. Not as good as he was doing before, but that could change next year. As it stands, he's still a worry for Mclaren and Ferrari drivers at any given weekend.
Ark said:Ferrari fired Kimi to make way for Alonso.
I can see Alonso moving on if they can't deliver a good, competitive car in 2012.DrM said:Ferrari won't sign any driver that pose any threat for their Spanish superstar
StoOgE said:Tavo Hellmund (the original race promotor) bolted a few months back, and has yet to sell the race contract to the company he formarly worked for. Pretty seedy shit going on there.
rogue_pigeon said:According to Bernie, and who knows if he's playing silly buggers or not, Tavo's contract was cancelled a while back as he was in breach, and since then he's been negotiating a new contract with the track owners. But they're delaying supplying a letter of credit, so those negotiations are currently stalled.
He's given them until the 7th of December to supply it, although going by Autosport's wording, even that might not be an ultimate deadline.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/96270
brotkasten said:I can see Alonso moving on if they can't deliver a good, competitive car in 2012.
"We've done everything we bloody well can to make this race happen," Ecclestone told the Press Association. When asked whether the race was in danger of being dropped, he replied: "Yes, it will be for sure, 100 per cent."
I can't believe Ferrari haven't been able to produce a championship winning car three years in a row, same with Mclaren. But it seems like Mclaren are moving in the right direction whereas Ferrari are still lagging behind. Mclaren have won 6 races this year, Ferrari have only won 1. Alonso needs a championship winning carbrotkasten said:I can see Alonso moving on if they can't deliver a good, competitive car in 2012.
I wish I was was.Omiee said:who is going to monaco's race next year?
Sad news but who knows. They could have had the race and then 2 years later try to get out of it like Korea has done. It will be interesting to see if NY/NJ will happen.Myoclonic Jerk said:Austin is everything but axed
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/96270
Myoclonic Jerk said:
Alonso signed with Ferrari in 2008. I dont think Ferrari would have decided that early to get rid of Raikkonen since he had a contract through 2010. Kimi's crazy high salary was an obvious sign that Ferrari wanted him to be their lead driver, and I think what finally clinched it was Kimi STILL not able to put a dent on Massa in 2009, so they decided to buy out his contract to get Alonso a year earlier. I think if Kimi had performed better during his time there, they'd have relished a Kimi/Alonso combo.Ark said:Ferrari fired Kimi to make way for Alonso.
SunhiLegend said:I can't believe Ferrari haven't been able to produce a championship winning car three years in a row, same with Mclaren. But it seems like Mclaren are moving in the right direction whereas Ferrari are still lagging behind. Mclaren have won 6 races this year, Ferrari have only won 1. Alonso needs a championship winning car
Burai said:They had a championship winning car last year but utterly screwed up the last race. The potential is there which should keep Alonso on board.
StoOgE said:To be completely fair, if Red Bull hadn't gone full stupid last year Alonso wouldn't have been in that position.
Seanspeed said:Two things you dont do in F1:
- write off Ferrari
- write off Mclaren
Didn't McLaren and Red Bull vote against that rule change?Besides, the new regs look to suit Ferrari, as they haven't been able to exploit the exhaust-blowing as much as Red Bull and Mclaren have. Likely because their engine just cant take the aggressive mapping as much as the Renault and Mercedes.
In hindsight it was stupid, but they had to make a quick decision on Webber as he was the guy that was closest to overthrowing Alonso in the standings. I can see why they did it, but yea, it was pretty apparent in the following couple laps what a gigantic mistake it was.Burai said:True to a degree, but Ferrari's second half development push was brilliant. Alonso was the class of the field from Silverstone onward.
Why they covered off Webber who'd struggled all Abu Dhabi weekend whilst Vettel ran off into the distance I'll never know. Now that's full stupid.
The most successful team of the past decade and of all-time shouldn't be taken seriously? Whatever man. I think its becoming very clear its you who shouldn't be taken seriously.brotkasten said:"Never" can be a long time. A very, very long time.
"In 1996, Schumacher joined Ferrari for a salary of $50 million over 2 years, a team which had last won the Drivers' Championship with Jody Scheckter in 1979 and which had not won the Constructors' Cup since 1983 with drivers René Arnoux and Patrick Tambay at the wheel."
Not saying that it's that bad right now, but I couldn't blame anyone who doesn't take Ferrari that serious anymore.
Its still gonna go through. They really dont have much basis in arguing against it other than "I dont want to lose my advantage". Ross Brawn made it clear to the FIA that teams were looking/finding loopholes in the regs that were designed to stop teams from using exhaust-blowing as a downforce enhancer, so it was inevitable the FIA would clamp down on it.brotkasten said:Didn't McLaren and Red Bull vote against that rule change?
Seanspeed said:-snip-
I dont get what you're saying. I'm a Kimi fan myself. But I'm realistic about how things went down.Ark said:Not that I've got anything against you, and I'm not ignoring your opinion, but I've had more than enough Kimi arguments in the last couple of years.
I don't put Kimi's salary down to being the lead driver, but more to being quite the negotiator with money.
The Kimi arguments are almost as bad as the Hamilton/Button arguments.
Myoclonic Jerk said:
Seanspeed said:I dont get what you're saying. I'm a Kimi fan myself. But I'm realistic about how things went down.
Seanspeed said:The most successful team of the past decade and of all-time shouldn't be taken seriously? Whatever man. I think its becoming very clear its you who shouldn't be taken seriously.
Ark said:Alonso will finish his years in F1 at Ferrari, and if he leaves without another World Drivers Title, it will be considered one of the biggest failings of the decade.
I would love to see this just for epic lulzArk said:Alonso will finish his years in F1 at Ferrari, and if he leaves without another World Drivers Title, it will be considered one of the biggest failings of the decade.
I agree that he was overrated. As a fan, it wasn't easy to admit, but it was the only rational conclusion. Schumi had Massa well-in-hand in 2006. So when Schumi left, they hired the 'fastest guy in F1' and it cost them a lot of money to do so. I have no doubt in my mind he was brought in to be the lead driver/Schumi replacement. You dont pay that much money for somebody just to equal a guy who was only moderately rated. And thats why he was replaced. Had he kept up to his bargain, he'd still be racing at Ferrari, most likely alongside Alonso.Ark said:Well, you beat my stealth edit.
I feel like I'm one of the only people who feels Kimi is one of the most overrated drivers around. Post 2007, he has been lacklustre in everything he has done.
People expecting a Kimi blitz when he returns to F1 will be disappointed (I'm happy to eat my words though).
Because its completely asinine to say that people shouldn't take Ferrari seriously. And yes, I understand you said you could understand 'how others would feel that way', but it says something about you just to make the statement in the first place. Because no, I dont see how anyone in their right mind could reasonably write off Ferrari. Perhaps somebody could have the opinion that Red Bull will be very difficult to beat next year, and thats understandable, but to not take the team seriously is just some bonkers shit to say.brotkasten said:No, you!
Seriously now, why are you getting personal? You don't like my opinion, fine whatever, but there's no need to respond in that way. I think the regulars in this thread know that I'm a Ferrari fan, fully support Fernando and just trash Massa and the stupid race strategies. I never said that I don't take Ferrari seriously anymore. Maybe you should go out, get some fresh air, come back and read my post again.
Apparently Rory Bryne has a bigger role as Technical Advisor for next year's car. Thats very good news.DrM said:I would love to see this just for epic lulz
And i still think that they made major mistake with sacking Costa.
with Bernie you can never tell. He was saying similar things about the British GP right up to the point they signed an.agreement.Myoclonic Jerk said:
Well the 2012 calendar is finalized on December 7th. Either the race is good to go by then, or it is done for.mrklaw said:with Bernie you can never tell. He was saying similar things about the British GP right up to the point they signed an.agreement.
keit4 said:How a two times world champion can be one of the biggest failings of the decade? What about Hamilton then?
Shaneus said:I'd say Webber would be the most disappointing. Given that he's one of the few in the top-tier teams that worked his way through the bottom feeders to get lucky with where he is, coupled with the fact that he was so achingly close last year yet this year is so far away from even a top 3 WDC finish, it kinda sucks.
And it really, really hurts to say that
Ark said:Alonso earned his titles last decade, and moved to the biggest team on the grid with the promise of winning more in this decade.
He keeps proving week on week that he's vastly over driving what that Ferrari can do, even last year as well, for Alonso to not win another WDC in seven years with Ferrari would be embarrassing.
Okay... now you say that, he has done far better than Coulthard. At least Webs almost fought his way up through the ranks. whereas DC has been with a top-tier team since his entry into F1.rogue_pigeon said:I don't really feel Webber has been at all disappointing, considering the path he's taken through F1. I remember vividly when he resigned (a possibly lengthy deal) with Jaguar, as I was so frustrated that he'd likely just thrown his career away.
Yet somehow he's scrambled through and come closer to a championship than David "THIS IS MY YEAR!" Coulthard ever did, who had a front-running car for the majority of his career.
Red Bull driver Jean-Eric Vergne headed the final morning of the young driver test in Abu Dhabi, setting a best mark just 0.436s off Sebastian Vettel's pole position time for last weekend's grand prix.
The Frenchman, who also topped the first two days of the test, improved on his best time by over a second to top the times by 2.430s from Ferrari's Jules Bianchi.
Oliver Turvey returned to work for McLaren after sitting out yesterday's running in favour of Gary Paffett. He ended the morning ahead of Force India returnee Max Chilton, who was fourth fastest overall.
Alexander Rossi, driving an F1 car for the first time since a tryout for BMW Sauber in December 2009, made his first appearance for Team Lotus. After spending the early running familiarising himself with the car, he ended up fifth fastest ahead of Sauber's Esteban Gutierrez.
Stefano Coletti returned to action for Scuderia Toro Rosso, ending up with a best time 5.628s off the pace. He hands over the car to Kevin Ceccon for the rest of the day.
Mirkko Bortolotti was another to return to F1 action after two years away, driving for Williams as a prize for winning the F2 title. He ended the morning eighth fastest after improving on his final lap.
Nathanael Berthon had his first significant run in the HRT. He completed nine laps yesterday afternoon, but added a further 36 this morning. He ended up just five-hundredths of a second faster than Virgin's Charles Pic, with Renault debutant Jan Charouz a further eight-tenths behind.
Sam Bird was slowest on the timesheets, but spent the morning focusing on evaluation work, including running experimental exhausts for 2012 as Mercedes worked to understand the loss of performance from new regulations designed to outlaw blown diffusers.
Pos Driver Team Time
1. Jean-Eric Vergne Red Bull-Renault 1m38.917s
2. Jules Bianchi Ferrari 1m41.347s
3. Olivier Turvey McLaren-Mercedes 1m42.346s
4. Max Chilton Force India-Mercedes 1m42.618s
5. Alexander Rossi Lotus-Renault 1m44.381s
6. Esteban Gutierrez Sauber-Ferrari 1m44.531s
7. Stefano Coletti Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1m44.545s
8. Mirkko Bortolotti Williams-Cosworth 1m46.076s
9. Nathanael Berthon HRT-Cosworth 1m46.299s
10. Charles Pic Virgin-Cosworth 1m46.348s
11. Jan Charouz HRT-Cosworth 1m47.159s
12. Sam Bird Mercedes GP 1m47.624s
That's exactly what I'm going for. Good to know that you finally understood me.Seanspeed said:But you know what? Go ahead and be pessimistic or let other people bash. It'll make it all the more glorious when Ferrari pull out a winning car. I'll be there to say I supported them. What will you say?