Myoclonic Jerk said:I've lost what I was trying to say with this post, so I'll stop here lol
I didn't say anything about Kimi and Massa..
Kimi will never return to the peak he was at at McLaren.
Myoclonic Jerk said:I've lost what I was trying to say with this post, so I'll stop here lol
I'm certainly glad I spent all that time arguing with you to find out something you could have just told me straight up.brotkasten said:That's exactly what I'm going for. Good to know that you finally understood me.
Latest news is that Bernie is willing to let the race slip a year to 2013. While I'd prefer a 2012 race, having ANY race is still better than NO race. It would also allow for there to be two races (maybe) in the US in the same year. Hell, Rossi might even be driving for a team by then...Meier said:I really hope all the people involved get this nonsense worked out here in Austin. No one benefits from the race not happening.
Didn't Indy have F1 until 2007?InertiaXr said:What the hell is the problem with the Austin race? I wanted to get my dad tickets for it for his birthday, he's watched nearly every race for probably a decade or so now on TV but living in the US means he has never been to a race, but the track seems to keep having problems.
Psychotext said:Didn't Indy have F1 until 2007?
But yeah, it's shit. Typical F1 farce.
navanman said:Kinda long but some serious question raised over this interview; what exactly happened in Austin.
http://www.statesman.com/blogs/cont...2011/11/17/combs_joins_list_of_austin_f1.html
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en...u_1ggaCgoICAESBAIbhB0M,isz:l&biw=1603&bih=989Ark said:Does anyone happen to know where I can get a much larger version of this picture?
Found it on the BBC website (it's on the front-page) and it's just a really good picture imo.
S. L. said:https://www.google.com/search?hl=en...u_1ggaCgoICAESBAIbhB0M,isz:l&biw=1603&bih=989
(chrome google image search extension is super sweet)
Venezuelan Congressman Carlos Ramos is beginning to delve into details about the PDVSA sponsorship of the WilliamsF1 team. According to Ramos, no-one in Venezuela apart from a handful of Chaves supporters know the details of the sponsorship: what has been paid and promised the team. According to Venezuelan law, no public money can be committed to such projects without the approval of the Venezuelan Congress. Neither Hugo Chavez, nor PDVSA, can unilaterally spend public monies without government approval. Ramos says that the contract between PDVSA and Williams F1 team might be illegal, as he can find no record of the contract having ever been discussed, or approved, by Congress.
Ramos says that the reports in Venezuela have suggested that the deal could be worth as much as $225 million over the full term, depending on the success of the team.
Wax Free Vanilla said:http://www.f1katewalker.com/uploads/8/5/3/6/8536585/7390019_orig.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Goodbye, Maldonado. Hello, Kimi.
Leunam said:How much larger?
"Unfortunately I cannot say anything bad about the team, it says so in my contract," said Petrov. "But many things have already been written about in the media.
"People say the team criticised the drivers. But excuse me; read my interviews, I haven't criticised the team despite what we have lost so many times. How much have we missed at pitstops? With strategy?
"We have lost positions in about 10 races or even more. Even without a fast car we could have gained good points, we could have finished with points if we had had a good strategy.
"But I couldn't say in interviews that we lost it with the pitstops, and I cannot talk about that now either. But I can't keep silent any more - it is over. I can't keep everything inside any more."
"We have been excited for and working towards a 2012 USGP race and now understand that Mr Ecclestone is interested in moving the Austin race to 2013," he said.
"We know the US market is important to the teams and their sponsors and 2013 certainly allows time for the Circuit of the Americas to be ready."
Myoclonic Jerk said:Williams are not obliged to reply to the letter nor to satisfy the requests.
This letter means nothing, unless the pending payments are a big sum, there might be a risk of not fulfilling the contract from PDVSA's side.
Donnington springs to mind. Not exactly the same, but the most recent.Sleeplessnights said:Was there any drama before with a new track like Austin?
More like goodbye Maldonado - hello some other, lesser paydriver.NihonTiger90 said:Goodbye, Maldonado. Hello, Kimi.
Seanspeed said:More like goodbye Maldonado - hello some other, lesser paydriver.
Depends on what they'd actually bring to the team. I dont think we've heard much in the way of details. Talking about Williams joining the big three is a little too optimistic at this point. They need to work back to getting to the head of the midfield first.zomgbbqftw said:Not if that Qatari investment works out. It would be interesting to see Williams (a historically strong team) get a massive cash infusion without any strings attached like having to take on a crappy driver like Maldonado. It could make the top three teams into the top four teams with the amount of money that the Qataris have.
That would be brilliant.navanman said:In German but Google translate makes a decent (terrible) attempt to translate it
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/...s-mclaren-honda-vor-dem-comeback-4100663.html
brotkasten said:I thought McLaren wanted to build their own engines?
Myoclonic Jerk said:Eric Boulliieeeiaiuiereiaur (the renault guy) confirms that he has been talking to Kimi's managers - f1.com interview
This is getting really silly
Foliorum Viridum said:Mark Webber says drivers want DRS rethink
Boo, I say. Pushing the car in quali is what it's all about.
Seanspeed said:Thats a mighty risk Mclaren would be taking. Going from the best engine on the grid to the manufacturer who had the worst engine on the grid when they left F1.
Didn't stop them from spending hundreds of millions of dollars every year. Sorry, but thats not a good excuse. They had every opportunity to build an engine as good as the Toyota/Renault/BMW/Ferrari/Mercedes, but didn't.Ark said:I always thought it was silly allowing unlimited DRS usage during practice & qualy.
Honda were hardly in a advantageous financial position when they left the grid, and even for years before that. Having McLaren as a sole and exclusive partner to supply engines too would be beneficial for both parties if things work out. Especially now that the Mercedes team is picking up speed.
Ark said:Not to mention seeing the name 'VodafoneMcLaren Honda' would be quite something again.
Seanspeed said:Didn't stop them from spending hundreds of millions of dollars every year. Sorry, but thats not a good excuse. They had every opportunity to build an engine as good as the Toyota/Renault/BMW/Ferrari/Mercedes, but didn't.
If I were Mclaren, my only two options I'd look at would be to either stick with Mercedes or build my own engines. Perhaps if Honda comes back with another team and their engines proves really good, then maybe switch over, but its too big a risk to take for them if they desire to stay at the front. I mean, their engine right now is one of their biggest advantages. It turned the 09 Honda into a championship-winning Brawn. It turned Force India from a back-of-the-grid team into a team capable of consistently scoring points.
I personally dont believe it'll happen. Not until Honda have a proven engine.
brotkasten said:It it happens, I'd like to see at least a shopped version of the car with the old livery.
navanman said:Anyone got or recommend a F1 print?
I want to get one for my bedroom wall.
Something iconic and classy looking would be great.
Edit:
This one looks class
http://www.zazzle.co.uk/downhill_at_spa_poster-228096461363437653
The Brawn was not class of the field without the Mercedes engine by most accounts. I think Brawn himself said something about the engine not only giving them more than half a second time improvement, but was also more reliable and had a much more driveable power curve. And yes, I realize it wasn't the engine alone in helping Brawn and Force India, but it was most definitely a major factor in both cases.Ark said:The Mercedes engine did not turn the 09 Brawn into a winner, it merely helped it. The Brawn was already class of the field without the Mercedes engine. Likewise with Force India, their partnership with McLaren has aided them greatly, along with natural team progression.
You don't get anywhere quickly without taking risks. Ferrari played it safe over the winter building a reliable car, and look where they are now. Honda have had more than enough time to get their act together and produce a good engine, they have no need to 'prove themselves again' because the precedent is already there.
McLaren aren't yet in a position to build their own engines. They've already built a top-class standard car engine, but building an F1 engine is a whole different ball game, especially with the exhaust rules changing every other race at this point. Staying with Mercedes just wont let them be competitive enough in the constructors. They've had their exclusive partnership thing with Mercedes for many years now, and effectively, were the Mercedes representative in F1. Now that Mercedes has their own team, and are more concerned over their own efforts rather than that of McLaren, McLaren need to find an engine supplier (whether it be their own, or a third party) that will provide them with the advantages they need.