Relative to how much one likes Vettel?It's all relative
Relative to how much one likes Vettel?It's all relative
I don't get the whole "OMG Vettel was a MONSTER in the final few laps" thing considering his fastest lap was still 2+ seconds off pole on Softs, with light fuel load *shrugs*
He was chasing down Hamilton and Raikkonen who were on 20 lap old mediums, Vettel chasing down with fresh softs which are over a second faster than new mediums. They lasted 4 laps and dropped off in the last lap. Seems about right what he did. Nothing unexpected really.
How did Kimi stay ahead of Hamilton, is the Mercedes that bad in race speed? I thought only the nose was damaged, the from wing bits are missing too.
![]()
I'm pretty sure the Lotus is better at managing tyre wear than the Mercedes. With better tyres, Merc might have been in with a shout of winning.
Also, why didn't Raikonnen change his front wing? Surely the benefits of a new front wing would have outweighed the extra time in the pit stop. Especially as it was pretty early on
RAI said the team wanted to change, but he felt good enough with it, and didn´t want to lose the time.
This pic was so many funny things in it, it's overloaded. haha Massa and his kid. You'll do well here Junior.
Yo whats up with her feet? I don't even....
I'm pretty sure the Lotus is better at managing tyre wear than the Mercedes. With better tyres, Merc might have been in with a shout of winning.
RAI said the team wanted to change, but he felt good enough with it, and didn´t want to lose the time.
Porsche have denied reports they had signed the Formula One driver on a five-year enduro sports car deal from 2014 after the Australian Red Bull driver's miserable weekend in Shanghai was ultimately ended by a loose rear tyre.
Moments after Webber's Shanghai challenge ended, Twitter lit up over his reported Porsche deal, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.
The official Le Mans 24 Hour account added to the speculation with a tweet which included Webber's 'AussieGrit' handle.
"Mark Webber at the 24 hours 2014 with Porsche ...May be ... #LM24 AussiGrit (sic) #mission2014", they tweeted.
However, Porsche's Wolfgang Hatz said they had not signed Webber as they prepared to hit the test track later this year ahead of their World Endurance Championship assault.
"There is a test plan and for sure Mark Webber is not part of them," he told AutoAction.
"We can have perhaps some Formula One drivers in the future but it is not necessary."
Webber was last involved in sports cars in 1999.
Rumours of a split with Red Bull were fuelled by a report earlier in the Herald Sun that Webber had reportedly signed a new five-year contract to lead Porsche in their return to famous 24 hour endurance race Le Mans.
Porsche denies Mark Webber deal
http://www.emirates247.com/sports/other/porsche-denies-mark-webber-deal-2013-04-15-1.502660
Sounds like it was all just bollocks, starting with rumours that steam-rolled thanks to Twitter and were picked up by mainstream media with little to no research.
Actually it was other way around.
It's the other way around.
It's almost like they started from scratch
They did.
I thought the new compound was going to be for after Bahrain. This is better.
:lol never seen that.
there's a gif of the "El Lobo" bit but I can't find it
I laughed so hard when I saw that shit
Christ I was trying to forget this awfulness.
awfulness? That right there was the pinnacle of American Motorsport coverage my good man LMAO!!
This tire issue is becoming really annoying IMO. Tires are part of motorsports and should have an effect on the race, but they should not be the absolute, overriding, dominate force that they are now.
FORMULA One chief Bernie Ecclestone and pay-television giant Sky have discussed distributing free set-top boxes which are restricted to picking up the sport, in order to increase viewing figures
It is nearly two years since pay-television operator BSkyB announced that it had snatched the exclusive rights to broadcast Formula One from the BBC. Although the initial uproar is a distant memory, it hasn't been forgotten. Sky broadcasts all F1 races live whilst the BBC shows just nine this year with delayed highlights of the ten others. The impact of this has not been hard to notice.
In February Pitpass' business editor Christian Sylt revealed that F1's viewing figures in the UK fell by 3.8m to 28.6m in 2012, the first year of Sky's deal. Lotus' team principal Eric Boullier told Sylt that the teams are monitoring the move to pay-TV and admitted that if it becomes global, they may need to review their sponsorship rates. Historically the teams' offering to sponsors has been based on them being seen by as many viewers as possible but Sky presents a hurdle to this as the minimum cost of the package which shows F1 is £318. If F1's boss Bernie Ecclestone gets his way it won't cost viewers a penny.
Writing in the Express newspaper Sylt reveals that Ecclestone advised Sky to distribute free receiver boxes which are restricted to picking up F1 in order to drive conversion rates to its full service and increase viewing figures.
Talking to Sylt Ecclestone said that following the announcement that Sky would broadcast F1 he received letters from fans saying "we aren't going to watch Formula One any more" and in response he "said to Sky why don't you give people free Sky boxes that will only be able to receive Formula One. I said you can guarantee that when you put a Sky box in the house, although it is only for Formula One, people are going to say 'why can't I watch the rest' and they will sign up.
"Kids will say 'my friends at school watch this so why can't we?' Sky are very good with that kind of idea. It would use Formula One to drive their subscriptions."
It is a fascinating scheme which could only have been dreamt up by a master wheeler and dealer like Ecclestone. Although it is nothing more than an idea it would in fact be a natural progression of Sky's strategy to tempt viewers with free or lower-cost access.
In January it launched Sky Thursdays which involves some of its premium entertainment content being broadcast once a week on its free-to-air Freeview channel Pick TV. Last month Sky added Sky Sports to its internet TV service NOW TV which gives access to its F1 broadcasts for £9.99 per day. It could pave the way for using free F1 coverage as a trojan horse to get Sky into viewers' homes.
"The big problem I think is that it is not just a case of getting the Sky box, you have got to get a dish," says Ecclestone. He adds that in order to make F1 free-to-air Sky "are probably waiting for some sort of wireless system to come in where you don't need a dish." If the TV viewing figures continue to decline that may just make its début sooner rather than later.
No. Fucking. Shit. Obviously when going to pay TV there will be less viewers to see the sponsors on the cars. They only just thought of this now?Article on the viewing number woes and the free set top boxes: http://www.pitpass.com/48862-Ecclestone-reveals-free-Sky-F1-plan
Clowns.
No. Fucking. Shit. Obviously when going to pay TV there will be less viewers to see the sponsors on the cars. They only just thought of this now?
Fucking idiots.
So, how many of those 28.6m are from the BBC..Article on the viewing number woes and the free set top boxes: http://www.pitpass.com/48862-Ecclestone-reveals-free-Sky-F1-plan
Clowns.
Bahrain is using Hard and Softs? Is anybody going to set a time in in Q3?