Myoclonic Jerk
Member
Clearly the best picture from the article:
HAHA.. Fantastic stuff
Clearly the best picture from the article:
In fairness I think a retarded strategy was what made Vettel look average today rather than the car. It was clear early on that three stops was never going to work and they should have switched far sooner (and in reality they shouldn't have been on three stops at all).RBR with not a perfect cart make Vettel look average but better than Webber
Oh god this is horrifying. But lol at spilling drinks. They both lose.
RBR with not a perfect cart make Vettel look average but better than Webber, Hamilton is painful to watch as he's my second fav driver (Kimi), and to be honest Alonso is the best when given a somewhat decent car, +20 secs ahead of Massa same car.
Awkward interview with Hamilton on BBC
Not the most exciting race of the season, but damn if I don't love this sport more each race I watch!
I had a couple questions, though:
1. So when someone says a driver is in "dirty air", does that refer to being a certain distance behind the car ahead, putting the driver at some sort of an aerodynamic disadvantage prior to getting into a slipstream? The name itself leads me to believe it's not an ideal place to be in, but I can't tell from the commentary whether it truly is or not.
2. I guess I don't fully understand how being DRS-eligible works. I thought it is only considered if the car ahead is actually ahead of you in the race; however, it seemed as though there were a lot of drivers being allowed to use DRS by coming up behind a car they were lapping? Maybe I was just imagining that...
Not the most exciting race of the season, but damn if I don't love this sport more each race I watch!
I had a couple questions, though:
1. So when someone says a driver is in "dirty air", does that refer to being a certain distance behind the car ahead, putting the driver at some sort of an aerodynamic disadvantage prior to getting into a slipstream? The name itself leads me to believe it's not an ideal place to be in, but I can't tell from the commentary whether it truly is or not.
2. I guess I don't fully understand how being DRS-eligible works. I thought it is only considered if the car ahead is actually ahead of you in the race; however, it seemed as though there were a lot of drivers being allowed to use DRS by coming up behind a car they were lapping? Maybe I was just imagining that...
Not the most exciting race of the season, but damn if I don't love this sport more each race I watch!
I had a couple questions, though:
1. So when someone says a driver is in "dirty air", does that refer to being a certain distance behind the car ahead, putting the driver at some sort of an aerodynamic disadvantage prior to getting into a slipstream? The name itself leads me to believe it's not an ideal place to be in, but I can't tell from the commentary whether it truly is or not.
2. I guess I don't fully understand how being DRS-eligible works. I thought it is only considered if the car ahead is actually ahead of you in the race; however, it seemed as though there were a lot of drivers being allowed to use DRS by coming up behind a car they were lapping? Maybe I was just imagining that...
Up to 4th! Not bad
ah look at that helpful F1 Gaf.. was writing an answer and thought : mhh just refresh.. tada four already answered..
20th! Thank god I predicted Alonso win. After qualifying I thought I made a mistake but apparently I finally had some luck.
shit pants get it together
Did average this race, 47 points. Randomly got Di Resta, Rosberg and Button right and got 5 points for each of the guys on the podium.
That was my worst round, stupid mercedes I expected them to at least hold 5/6, fuck massa too
How dare Massa not embarrass himself!
wtf exactly happened to Mercedes that Hamilton managed to get lapped. The only time a front runner gets lapped is when something breaks!
Well there goes my gp predictor lead :lol
Yeah, saw that, but Rosberg still managed to get into points (6th) not great, but he did avoid getting lapped by the leaders. Hamilton just completely dropped off. He finished behind Gutierrez, Ricciardo and both McLaren's.according to Lewis, he "couldn't drive any slower"
Who's car was this? These tyres are absurd
Maybe I'm remembering wrong, but I remember being surprised in the past when F1 cars lost a wheel they still managed to remain completely balanced & flat even driving round with 3 wheels.
Are the cars not as balanced as they used to be? or am I imagining things
Puncture and flag investigation no problem for Alonso
Fernando Alonsos drive to victory in the Spanish Grand Prix was almost undone by a puncture during his fourth stint.
We had to bring forward the final stop because of a slow puncture which meant the left rear tyre was losing pressure in the final part of the lap,Alonso revealed after the race. Fortunately, that had no effect on the final outcome.
Despite his earlier than expected arrival Ferraris mechanics produced the fastest pit stop of the race for Alonso when he came in on the 49th lap.
Alonso was also investigated by the stewards for a potential rules infringement after the end of the race when he collected a Spanish flag.
This is forbidden by article 43.3 of the Sporting Regulations which says: After receiving the end-of-race signal all cars must proceed on the circuit directly to the post race parc ferme without any unnecessary delay, without receiving any object whatsoever and without any assistance (except that of the marshals if necessary).
However the stewards decided not to penalise Alonso, stating: no further action was taken to be consistent with a previous decision made under similar circumstances.
Who's car was this? These tyres are absurd
Respect the man.At the start, I had to make up some places but after passing the halfway point on the straight, there was no more room to do so. So I switched off the KERS, so as to use it in Turn 3, where I realised, after watching the GP2 race, that it was possible to attack around the outside.
We've got tires that disintegrate after 8 laps and telemetry that can't actually tell a driver if a flag is being waved. The pinnacle of motorsports, everybody.
They actually fixed the telemetry for this race.
I get that the tyre situation seems bad but I think it would be unfair to change the tyres now, these are the same tyres that they used in testing and clearly some teams have figured them out compared to others, not sure why they should lose out just because RBR, Mercedes etc. are eating their tyres, instead of whining why don't they see how Lotus are so kind on the tyres
Because it produces dreadful races where tire preservation takes priority over all things.
I was going to agree but then read this and it raises a valid point
http://willthef1journo.wordpress.com/2013/05/12/the-game-changer/
I was going to agree but then read this and it raises a valid point
http://willthef1journo.wordpress.com/2013/05/12/the-game-changer/
Jesus fuck me, which compound is this (didn't get to see the race)
Yeah. I don't know why Lotus and Ferrari should be punished because they managed to build a car that is most suited to the rules of this season If you want change to the tires discussion can be held after the season. I don't support changes during the season.
As a RBR (well, Webber) fan, I fully support this. Lotus and Ferrari should be commended for designing cars that look after their tyres.Exactly, the team's had these tyres during testing. If anything, this supports the theory that there should be more testing (which they voted against apparently) and testing in warmer climates to better simulate conditions during the season.
It will piss me off we get some tyre changes and suddenly it's red bull domination again