Feel bad for Williams and Sauber as well, they were on-course for a good result
woow vettel was turning in but adjusted his steering a mili second before massa apeared.
nice reflexes
correct call that rosberg didnt get a penalty for cutting the chicane. weve seen it many times before and a warning has always been given. consistency is consistent
Dead Man are you OK?
Post if you're OK.
Sauber? You mean Force India?
Not having ERS won't increase fuel consumption it only makes you A LOT slower. They're still on the 100kg/h limit for the ICE
So goddamn close...
IF Felipe had hit Vettel from the side, the consequences could've been a lot more dramatic, I think.
Crazy that the mercs failed on the same lap. must have been just a coincidence
This has to be the most positive and satisfying podium interview to watch all season. Hamilton's bitterness in the last couple of races was really souring the victories. Funny how after his retirement, everyone is now all smiles!
There is nothing to fine here.
Some of you should watch f1 for more than one fair weather fan season.
With all concerned faces on the pitwall I think that something really strange happened.
DrM said:Was this the first F1 race from TV director? Cutting to unimportant scenes, missing a lot of action...
Most drivers don't keep their foot in and gain a second when cutting a chicane. They need to put some foam or bumps there to stop that bullshit in future years.correct call that rosberg didnt get a penalty for cutting the chicane. weve seen it many times before and a warning has always been given. consistency is consistent
Most drivers don't keep their foot in and gain a second when cutting a chicane. They need to put some foam or bumps there to stop that bullshit in future years.
Was this the first F1 race from TV director? Cutting to unimportant scenes, missing a lot of action...
Nico for Autosport:
"When you lose ERS it doesn't harvest anymore, then any braking is done by rear braking, so that is why the rear brakes overheated," said Rosberg.
"That made it massively difficult: I needed to cool the brakes and lost speed on the straights.
correct call that rosberg didnt get a penalty for cutting the chicane. weve seen it many times before and a warning has always been given. consistency is consistent
27G impact for Massa?
FUUUUUCK.
Ricciardo is the nicest chap, stops interview to give autographs.
BBC F1 forum are pretty unanimous that it was Massa's fault.
Any comments from Lewis yet?
Interesting, didn´t know that about the rear discs being smaller. Engineering wise it does make sense, but wonder what safety margin they are being built to. Say, if the MGU-K fails..
wrong. dead wrong.
ok. give me an example and i might agree
Spa 2008. Hamilton actually gave the place back to Kimi after cutting the bus stop chicane, then overtook him again before Eau Rouge. But he was still handed down a 25 second penalty and stripped of his victory with the logic that he never would have been in a position to overtake had he not cut the chicane.
Hamilton gave the place back, but still gained an advantage as he had the slipstream. therefore he retook the position before the first corner. if he had not cut the chicane, he wouldnt have overtaken kimi in that position.
Anyway, its not a comparable example. Kimi had won the final corner. lewis had not won the corner. if lewis wasnt behind nico, there is no way nico would have got a penalty. its only because lewis was behind him that we are even talking about this. the decision was the correct one
No they weren't. DC said he moved across (he did) and EJ said it was Massa's fault.
The crash was 100% Perez's fault.
https://vine.co/v/MD0BgJYVeam
How many accidents has he caused in his F1 career? It's about time some action was taken. He's lucky his stupid actions didn't do some serious damage to the other two drivers near him, if Massa had ploughed into the cockpit area of the Red Bull it would have been horrific.
Sergio Perez has been handed a five place grid penalty for causing the crash with Felipe Massa #F1onNBC
youre splitting hairs and talking rubbish and you know it. In both instances a driver gained an advantage and a chunk of time cutting a chicane, with one driver defending a position by doing it and the other gaining one. Thats the only difference here, both cases involve a driver veering off track and gaining an advantage.
Though at least in Lewis' case, you could argue Raikkonen closed the door on him and forced him off the track, Nico simply buckled under pressure from a pursuing car.
youre splitting hairs and talking rubbish and you know it. In both instances a driver gained an advantage and a chunk of time cutting a chicane, with one driver defending a position by doing it and the other gaining one. Thats the only difference here, both cases involve a driver veering off track and gaining an advantage.
Though at least in Lewis' case, you could argue Raikkonen closed the door on him and forced him off the track, Nico simply buckled under pressure from a pursuing car.
Any comments from Lewis yet?
Interesting, didn´t know that about the rear discs being smaller. Engineering wise it does make sense, but wonder what safety margin they are being built to. Say, if the MGU-K fails..
Your also missing the significant difference. unlike the 2008 incident, they werent side by side. nico did not defend the position by going off track. if he stayed on track, he would have maintained his position.
And why would I be wasting my life talking to you if i thought i was talking rubbish lol
That tiny correction/mistake by Vettel saved his ass. If he did that on purpose then he's a God.