But thats the way it is this year, they all agreed to it in the regs.
Exactly. It's an incredibly simple thing. The person with the most points will win, as they've done the best over the course of the season and thus deserve it. Magic.
Not if it is due to double points.
Man, that opening piece on BBC is pretty sad when you see it that way.
Suzie's skirt is giving me eye cancer.
Yeah don't understand all the double points hate.
What if the season was 18 races? Or 20 races? Or one race was half points due to bad weather?
Edit: What a filler by Sky.
I don't think you can simplify it that much. There are a number of things that could still happen and make a mockery of what you just said.
The double points are pretty meaningless for the most possible outcomes today.
Because you can see through it?
I don't think you can simplify it that much. There are a number of things that could still happen and make a mockery of what you just said.
Because you can see through it?
Would be glorious if Massa overtakes Lewis in the last Lap and loses the WCC that way
Suzie's skirt is giving me eye cancer.
VettelSo I'm curious, with all this talk about "deserving" the championship. If Hamilton decides to just "accidentally" run into Rosberg in a corner, taking out both cars and wrapping it up... who "deserves" to win the championship then?
How so?
Let's look at some of the likely possibilities:
- Rosberg wins the race, Hamilton is second. Hamilton wins the championship.
- Hamilton wins the race. Hamilton wins the championship.
- Neither of them finish the race. Hamilton wins the championship.
- Rosberg wins the race, Hamilton fails to finish second because he made a mistake. Rosberg wins the championship.
- Rosberg wins the race, Hamilton fails to finish second because of a pit error. Rosberg wins the championship.
- Rosberg wins the race, Hamilton fails to finish second because of a technical problem. Rosberg wins the championship.
These are all possibilities both contenders are well aware of going into the final race. They are both also aware that if either of them had done better throughout the season in a number of other races, they had the chance to wrap the championship up.
Putting a spring in your front wing and trying to cover it by putting it in rubber and painting it isn't bending the rules it is fucking cheating and they should have the book thrown at them.
So I'm curious, with all this talk about "deserving" the championship. If Hamilton decides to just "accidentally" run into Rosberg in a corner, taking out both cars and wrapping it up... who "deserves" to win the championship then?
Senna won a championship without even having the most points. Prost deserved it but the rules of the time determined Senna did.If Lewis finishes third and Rosberg wins the race Rosberg is WDC, without double points Lewis would be WDC. It matters. Normally a 17 point buffer would mean a fifth place finish wins the title, now it means anything less than second loses it if Rosberg wins.
Double points makes a mockery of the rest of the season's ups and downs, it is an artificial and stupid way of "spicing up" F1 and that people who previously hated the idea of double points now don't mind it because Hamilton might lose because of it is pretty telling.
If Rosberg wins via double points his WDC will always have an asterisk next to it because it would not be legitimate.
Senna's ghost.So I'm curious, with all this talk about "deserving" the championship. If Hamilton decides to just "accidentally" run into Rosberg in a corner, taking out both cars and wrapping it up... who "deserves" to win the championship then?
If Ferrari doesn't win today it's the first time since 1993 that they haven't won a single race in a season. That's how bad they are right now.
So I'm curious, with all this talk about "deserving" the championship. If Hamilton decides to just "accidentally" run into Rosberg in a corner, taking out both cars and wrapping it up... who "deserves" to win the championship then?
If Rosberg wins via double points his WDC will always have an asterisk next to it because it would not be legitimate.
wercs gotta be worries about the williams pace on the straight on the first lap
LOL (former) King Juan Carlos confirmed to spanish TV that Alonso is going to Mclaren.
Rosberg. Sigh, but true. 1 mostly-deliberate damaging contact versus 1 really obvious contact designed to DNF someone. The later being 100% inexcusable under any circumstances, ever. Ever. I'd want Lewis' Super License revoked and him out of the sport.So I'm curious, with all this talk about "deserving" the championship. If Hamilton decides to just "accidentally" run into Rosberg in a corner, taking out both cars and wrapping it up... who "deserves" to win the championship then?
One of the drivers should be chosen each time to sing itWtf??? Are they serious with lining up the drivers for the National anthem??
Alonso back at Mclaren seems like a strange one given his history there. Ron Dennis on his way out?