But helicopter, two hour meetings and big smiles.
Surely this is legit.
what are you talking about he got a helicopter from monaco to woking while he was simultaneously flying to singapore for friday practice
nothing suspicious here guise
But helicopter, two hour meetings and big smiles.
Surely this is legit.
Is F1Today.net reliable or full of crap?
http://f1today.net/en/news/hamilton-signs-for-mclaren-for-2015
#EnginePorn
That rumor is crap because of the seat fitting part. Nobody makes a seat fitting for another team in the middle of a season.
However the Spanish press continues to insist Alonso is waiting for the possibility of Mercedes turmoil to happen and grab the empty seat left by Hamilton. Same rumors say Alonso still has 2 other options open to him: Williams and Lotus if he brings the sponsor required to pay his salary. According to those some rumors, Pat Symonds convinced Frank and Claire Williams that they can fight for the WDC with Alonso next year, the problem is that they are not going to pay him what he wants + Massa release clause.
Also apparently Marchionne was in favour of a complete driver overhaul and wanted a fresh 2015 lineup. Plans for the October 13th Vettel announcement are still up in the air after Bianchi's injury. Complete sadness if those rumors were indeed true (the Kubica-Ferrari deal was indeed true...)
Apparently they show that the Marussia driver drove too fast under yellow flags in the curve.
Article says no recording of the accident from the FOM feed (no inboard recording?) and that there's a recording from the internal circuit video.
Only 9 onboard cameras are working simultaneously. Usually it's the leaders, interesting action in the midpack and sometimes one backmarker. At the time of the accident, main onboard channel was showing Ericsson's Caterham, so there is no conspiracy and indeed there can be no footage from Bianchi's onboard.
That in itself is ridiculous. What excuse is there for every camera to not be recording all the time?
Hard Drive space obviously too much for FOM.
Then very car has an SSD in it and the problem goes away, for the sake of analysing accidents.Wireless spectrum.
Then very car has an SSD in it and the problem goes away, for the sake of analysing accidents.
Only 9 onboard cameras are working simultaneously. Usually it's the leaders, interesting action in the midpack and sometimes one backmarker. At the time of the accident, main onboard channel was showing Ericsson's Caterham, so there is no conspiracy and indeed there can be no footage from Bianchi's onboard.
He needs to win the next two races to get a comfy 24 point buffer.I doubt either driver will have to take a penalty on engines. If they were going to do it then of course just like everyone else, you do it before the last race of the season. They have the advantage of course of being able to qualify at the front so could probably recover to 2nd/3rd in the race.
Another thing to consider is that if you just replace the entire power unit you have to start from the pitlane. So if one were to have a Q1 accident or something that meant they were starting near the back anyway, then swapping out the whole caboodle might be worth it.
Hamilton is proving again and again that he has Rosberg in his pocket on Sundays, but that Rosberg can match/beat him on one lap pace on Saturdays. Fortunately for Lewis, Sunday is what matters.
Lest we forget Lewis is 10 points in front despite 3 DNFs, 1 start from the back of the grid and one start from the pitlane while Nico hasn't started outside the top 4 and only DNF twice.
The issue of course is that 10 points is not enough. A tiny mistake in Abu Double will take anyone out of the race and cost them or others dearly, I hope the title isn;t decided based on double points and the intervention of another drivers error on Lewis/Nico. Of course Lewis will want to be 51 points ahead from the final race of the season (not likely imo), or at least 15 to ensure he can follow Rosberg home and still win. Not needing to pass your title rival in the last race of the year would be quite beneficial!
Racewatch uses real-time data from lap timing, the Global Positioning System, tyre and motor information to look for patterns in car movement. Also the signals from the cameras in the race cars are included.
i'm calling bullshit on the no official footage of the crash - what did salo watch in the stewards office? plus that german company supplies the fom their recording system that captures over 30 camera feeds, plus all radio channels.
Article says no recording of the accident from the FOM feed (no inboard recording?) and that there's a recording from the internal circuit video.
Any pictures of the Sochi track?
That in itself is ridiculous. What excuse is there for every camera to not be recording all the time?
They should really figure out a way to solve that bandwidth issue if that's actually true. If they can't view the footage from every car, how are they supposed to determine what's going on in certain incidents, such as this one?
That's crazy.
itsgreen said:Again: Wireless spectrum. There isn't enough legal bandwidth in the sky for them to use.
I would've considered onboard cameras recorded at all times, for all cars mandatory, myself.
They can't record it to the equivalent of the black box within the car itself?
K.
Well you don't need to deal with realities like signal interference and bandwith and regulations.
Sure they probably could do it.
K.
Yeah, I'm not talking about wireless. I'm talking about recording it locally. I'm just surprised it isn't done, that's all.
And yes, they know what happened - but I'm talking more widespread. Telemetry wouldn't have picked up a spring flying into Felipe Massa's left temple.
Assuming the SSD was in a place where it could survive that sort of impact of course.
Saw this on Reddit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zaf7NvouDBQ
Funny how much work Schumacher has with the steering compared to the V8 and V6.
Weren't those grooved tires less grippy?
Weren't those grooved tires less grippy?
2006 Ferraristone's have far more grip than the pieces of shit they run today.
The work rate is higher in 2006 because cars today have much better suspension and diffusers.
Well you don't need to deal with realities like signal interference and bandwith and regulations.
Sure they probably could do it. Would that add anything more to this? They have outside camera's, they have GPS, they have telemetry... They know what happened.
K.
The publicity generated by the tragic death of Ayrton Senna 15 years ago 'was good for F1' that is the extraordinary pronouncement of the sport's commercial rights-holder Bernie Ecclestone, who earlier this year was widely pilloried for having admired Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein as model leaders who 'got things done'.
http://www.crash.net/f1/news/153720/1/ecclestone-publicity-from-senna-death-good-for-f1.html
Those Russians
EJ would buy pink version in split second.
So guys, Driveclub.
Wow. This game. Don't believe the reviews, it's fucking awesome! I wish we could get a F1 game like this.
but who am I kidding. The sport is ran by a man who said Senna's death was good for the sport. Shows where their priorities are
That onboard is from Q2 in 2004, when track was still drying.
But yeah, Pirellis offer very poor grip.
Wouldn't a tank-slapper aqua-planing moment increase momentum too, similar to Raikkonen's accident in Silverstone?
Those Russians
EJ would buy pink version in split second.