• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Formula 1 2014 Season |OT2| Louder Than Formula E

kiyomi

Member
But helicopter, two hour meetings and big smiles.

Surely this is legit.

what are you talking about he got a helicopter from monaco to woking while he was simultaneously flying to singapore for friday practice

nothing suspicious here guise
 

DrM

Redmond's Baby
The craziest (fake) rumor going on now is that podium interviews will be carried by Putin himself :D :D :D
 
#EnginePorn

BzbS5cmCMAA9NCu.jpg:large
 

NHale

Member

That rumor is crap because of the seat fitting part. Nobody makes a seat fitting for another team in the middle of a season.

However the Spanish press continues to insist Alonso is waiting for the possibility of Mercedes turmoil to happen and grab the empty seat left by Hamilton. Same rumors say Alonso still has 2 other options open to him: Williams and Lotus if he brings the sponsor required to pay his salary. According to those some rumors, Pat Symonds convinced Frank and Claire Williams that they can fight for the WDC with Alonso next year, the problem is that they are not going to pay him what he wants + Massa release clause.

Also apparently Marchionne was in favour of a complete driver overhaul and wanted a fresh 2015 lineup. Plans for the October 13th Vettel announcement are still up in the air after Bianchi's injury. Complete sadness if those rumors were indeed true (the Kubica-Ferrari deal was indeed true...)
 

kvk1

Member
I thought we were supposed to call them power units.

What if that's not an "engine" engine, but something entirely different?

Two engine cars confirmed 2015. Get on it F1Today.
 
That rumor is crap because of the seat fitting part. Nobody makes a seat fitting for another team in the middle of a season.

However the Spanish press continues to insist Alonso is waiting for the possibility of Mercedes turmoil to happen and grab the empty seat left by Hamilton. Same rumors say Alonso still has 2 other options open to him: Williams and Lotus if he brings the sponsor required to pay his salary. According to those some rumors, Pat Symonds convinced Frank and Claire Williams that they can fight for the WDC with Alonso next year, the problem is that they are not going to pay him what he wants + Massa release clause.

Also apparently Marchionne was in favour of a complete driver overhaul and wanted a fresh 2015 lineup. Plans for the October 13th Vettel announcement are still up in the air after Bianchi's injury. Complete sadness if those rumors were indeed true (the Kubica-Ferrari deal was indeed true...)

Personally, I'm leaving the possibility open that Alonso ends up with Mercedes and Lewis goes back to McLaren. Despite whatever Niki says. If Merc was to be unhappy with Lewis' performance, attitude, or salary demands I think they'd be more than willing to do that. If he wins the WDC, probably not however. Ron would do that trade 100 out of a 100 times. I think getting Lewis back is why he gets out of bed every morning.
 

Mastah

Member
Article says no recording of the accident from the FOM feed (no inboard recording?) and that there's a recording from the internal circuit video.

Only 9 onboard cameras are working simultaneously. Usually it's the leaders, interesting action in the midpack and sometimes one backmarker. At the time of the accident, main onboard channel was showing Ericsson's Caterham, so there is no conspiracy and indeed there can be no footage from Bianchi's onboard.
 

DBT85

Member
Only 9 onboard cameras are working simultaneously. Usually it's the leaders, interesting action in the midpack and sometimes one backmarker. At the time of the accident, main onboard channel was showing Ericsson's Caterham, so there is no conspiracy and indeed there can be no footage from Bianchi's onboard.

That in itself is ridiculous. What excuse is there for every camera to not be recording all the time?
 

kiyomi

Member
Only 9 onboard cameras are working simultaneously. Usually it's the leaders, interesting action in the midpack and sometimes one backmarker. At the time of the accident, main onboard channel was showing Ericsson's Caterham, so there is no conspiracy and indeed there can be no footage from Bianchi's onboard.

wut.
 
I doubt either driver will have to take a penalty on engines. If they were going to do it then of course just like everyone else, you do it before the last race of the season. They have the advantage of course of being able to qualify at the front so could probably recover to 2nd/3rd in the race.

Another thing to consider is that if you just replace the entire power unit you have to start from the pitlane. So if one were to have a Q1 accident or something that meant they were starting near the back anyway, then swapping out the whole caboodle might be worth it.

Hamilton is proving again and again that he has Rosberg in his pocket on Sundays, but that Rosberg can match/beat him on one lap pace on Saturdays. Fortunately for Lewis, Sunday is what matters.

Lest we forget Lewis is 10 points in front despite 3 DNFs, 1 start from the back of the grid and one start from the pitlane while Nico hasn't started outside the top 4 and only DNF twice.

The issue of course is that 10 points is not enough. A tiny mistake in Abu Double will take anyone out of the race and cost them or others dearly, I hope the title isn;t decided based on double points and the intervention of another drivers error on Lewis/Nico. Of course Lewis will want to be 51 points ahead from the final race of the season (not likely imo), or at least 15 to ensure he can follow Rosberg home and still win. Not needing to pass your title rival in the last race of the year would be quite beneficial!
He needs to win the next two races to get a comfy 24 point buffer.
 
i'm calling bullshit on the no official footage of the crash - what did salo watch in the stewards office? plus that german company supplies the fom their recording system that captures over 30 camera feeds, plus all radio channels.

Racewatch uses real-time data from lap timing, the Global Positioning System, tyre and motor information to look for patterns in car movement. Also the signals from the cameras in the race cars are included.
 

itsgreen

Member
i'm calling bullshit on the no official footage of the crash - what did salo watch in the stewards office? plus that german company supplies the fom their recording system that captures over 30 camera feeds, plus all radio channels.

Article says no recording of the accident from the FOM feed (no inboard recording?) and that there's a recording from the internal circuit video.


...
 

Mastah

Member
That in itself is ridiculous. What excuse is there for every camera to not be recording all the time?

Bandwidth?

This is how it looks like:



As for what kind of footage they have - upper second row:


I don't think that view would add anything:


And finally this is view from camera that could potentially capture the accident, but here is the furthest to the right it was the whole race, so still accident would be off screen:

 

kiyomi

Member
They should really figure out a way to solve that bandwidth issue if that's actually true. If they can't view the footage from every car, how are they supposed to determine what's going on in certain incidents, such as this one?

That's crazy.
 

hadareud

The Translator
How is it crazy. They have more footage now than they ever did and almost certainly more footage than in just about every racing series in the world.

Not that there's no room for improvement, but let's be realistic here. Even if you have the footage from one angle, it's never enough to clear up every incident. In many cases you'll have to look at footage from multiple angles to really have a good idea of what happened exactly. It will take some time and a lot of money to cover every centimetre of a several mile long track from multiple angles.
 

itsgreen

Member
They should really figure out a way to solve that bandwidth issue if that's actually true. If they can't view the footage from every car, how are they supposed to determine what's going on in certain incidents, such as this one?

That's crazy.

They have telemetry and outside views of every car.

They have this for this accident.

Again: Wireless spectrum. There isn't enough legal bandwidth in the sky for them to use.

All the circuit cams they use, the 30 odd so, are wired. Bringing an F1 circus to a circuit means there are already a bazillion wireless signals in the air...
 

kiyomi

Member
I would've considered onboard cameras recorded at all times, for all cars mandatory, myself.

itsgreen said:
Again: Wireless spectrum. There isn't enough legal bandwidth in the sky for them to use.

They can't record it locally to the equivalent of the black box within the car itself?

K.
 

itsgreen

Member
I would've considered onboard cameras recorded at all times, for all cars mandatory, myself.



They can't record it to the equivalent of the black box within the car itself?

K.

Well you don't need to deal with realities like signal interference and bandwith and regulations.

Sure they probably could do it. Would that add anything more to this? They have outside camera's, they have GPS, they have telemetry... They know what happened.

K.
 

kiyomi

Member
Well you don't need to deal with realities like signal interference and bandwith and regulations.

Sure they probably could do it.

K.

Yeah, I'm not talking about wireless. I'm talking about recording it locally. I'm just surprised it isn't done, that's all.

And yes, they know what happened - but I'm talking more widespread. Telemetry wouldn't have picked up a spring flying into Felipe Massa's left temple.
 

itsgreen

Member
Yeah, I'm not talking about wireless. I'm talking about recording it locally. I'm just surprised it isn't done, that's all.

And yes, they know what happened - but I'm talking more widespread. Telemetry wouldn't have picked up a spring flying into Felipe Massa's left temple.

That's fair enough. I agree. Additional info never hurts. Costs are also probably relatively limited.
 

DBT85

Member
I'm still not sure on the bandwidth thing. Everyone at that track would have had a mobile signal, people/sponsors would have been setting up wifi hotspots, etc etc. The streams while "HD" aren't really decent quality, every camera from one car could be muxed down fairly easily I would have thought.

Assuming the SSD was in a place where it could survive that sort of impact of course.

Since there are huge chunks of car and electronics that survive these crashes I'm sure it's possible. Hell, the monocoque survived, put it under his ass.
 

Juicy Bob

Member
It's not really fair to compare 2004 Bridgestones with 2014 Pirellis when they were designed with two completely different concepts in mind.
 
Well you don't need to deal with realities like signal interference and bandwith and regulations.

Sure they probably could do it. Would that add anything more to this? They have outside camera's, they have GPS, they have telemetry... They know what happened.

K.

Quick fix until technology allows for all cams recording all the time?

Equip each corner with 3 GoPro's. Problem solved, and extremely cheap. Extract the footage if an incident or an accident happens that needs to be investigated further.

I've read some replies defending the sport regulators and justifications as silly as "they have the most camera coverage to any other sport" .. seriously?

You don't call yourself a pinnacle of something because you ticked a box in an area just for being "better". Being the pinnacle means that you keep working hard to achieve perfection, which is never achievable because standards change and the bars always get higher and higher, and in this instance they were far from being perfect taking the capability of the governing body into consideration

I don't think it's acceptable at all that there's no sufficient footage for them to analyze. Just off the top of my mind here's a couple of suggestions

- Place more fixed cameras on corners
- Fix tiny blackboxes on the cars to record all telemetry and camera recordings


See? Not difficult.. So it just shows that they just failed to even considering it an issue to begin with

but who am I kidding. The sport is ran by a man who said Senna's death was good for the sport. Shows where their priorities are

smh

EDIT:

The publicity generated by the tragic death of Ayrton Senna 15 years ago 'was good for F1' – that is the extraordinary pronouncement of the sport's commercial rights-holder Bernie Ecclestone, who earlier this year was widely pilloried for having admired Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein as model leaders who 'got things done'.

http://www.crash.net/f1/news/153720/1/ecclestone-publicity-from-senna-death-good-for-f1.html
 

Aiii

So not worth it
So guys, Driveclub.

Wow. This game. Don't believe the reviews, it's fucking awesome! I wish we could get a F1 game like this.
 

DD

Member
Autosport magazine is reporting that Ferrari fired Alonso after they discovered that the Spaniard was talking to Mercedes for a swap between him and Hamilton. Trusting issues...

Massa confirmed that Fernando wants to go to Mercedes, but believes that McLaren is the only place he can go now. The Brazilian also believes that the Honda engine will be the best of the grid, but he's not sure if the car itself will be good, since McLaren isn't in great shape recently.

Felipe also said that the last race was the worst of his carrer. Even worse than his own accident because he doesn't remember a thing about Hungary 2009. Said that he was shouting on the radio for them to end the race, because the track was getting worse and very dark.

It seems that telemetry shows that Bianchi was at 203 Km/h when he lost control of the car. On the lap before, he was at 230 at the same place. For comparison purposes, Ericsson was at 220 Km/h, and Chilton was at 198 Km/h.

Edit: Claire Williams wants covered cockpits, and Rob Smedley says that it's easy to implement it.
 

Ark

Member
Wouldn't a tank-slapper aqua-planing moment increase momentum too, similar to Raikkonen's accident in Silverstone?
 

Razgreez

Member
Wouldn't a tank-slapper aqua-planing moment increase momentum too, similar to Raikkonen's accident in Silverstone?

If somehow the angular momentum of the car during the spin/slide was greater than that of the car driving normally then the car could potentially gain speed. However, this is highly unlikely given the only moving part of the car able to affect angular momentum to that extent is the fuel and the fuel tank is designed to limit this
 
Top Bottom