Horner is so salty.
Redbull dominated for 2/3 seasons and never once spoke of equalising the field.
Pick up your toys and kindly fuck off.
To be fair, they have been whining about their engine since forever.
Horner is so salty.
Redbull dominated for 2/3 seasons and never once spoke of equalising the field.
Pick up your toys and kindly fuck off.
IIRC Malaysian rain seems to arrive late afternoon each day, so an hour earlier should reduce the chance of rain.Time of day isn't going to have a change on the weather.
While experienced, I don't recall her being that fast of a driver. I'd love to see her give it a go though.If anything, coming out and categorically stating that Wolff is not in line to replace Bottas if needed has harmed the team image. To me, it's a clear sign that Williams see her as nothing more than good PR. Why else would you not even consider promoting her to a race seat when she's done the most miles in the car compared to anyone outside the race drivers?
To be fair, they have been whining about their engine since forever.
Being slower than sauber must hurt too.
Sauber seems very happy with the improvements Ferrari did at the engine.
Fun fact: Ferrari was 34,5 seconds behind yesterday. In 2014, they were 35,2 seconds behind MercedesHobbs and Matchet were speculating the contact in lap 1 could have led to the tire issues. His team tried to wave him, but he was given the go. Kimi shouldn't get too mad because Ferrari looks much better than they did last season and it's just been one race.
Were they running Ferrari last year? I didn't realise they'd improved their PU so much until the weekend. What's Renault's excuse?I like it that Sauber clearly aknowledges that their improvement goes >50% to Ferrari and the engine. Of course they have fixed the aero/weight problems they had last year but they'd probably still be at the end of the pack if it weren't for Ferrari...
Were they running Ferrari last year? I didn't realise they'd improved their PU so much until the weekend. What's Renault's excuse?
Were they running Ferrari last year? I didn't realise they'd improved their PU so much until the weekend. What's Renault's excuse?
Then watched the race standing 2 metres from charlize theron! I have pics if people care.
I have pics if people care.
I have pics if people care.
Asked how come Mercedes superiority had apparently stretched since last year, a senior team member wasnt convinced that it had. I think actually a lot of that was just Lewis. The cars superiority was probably more like how Nicos lap showed it maybe around 1sec. Lewiss was just an amazing lap in those conditions. Hes in the midst of contract negotiations and suddenly you see the difference that calibre of driver can make.
http://www.motorsportmagazine.com/f1/reports/2015-australian-grand-prix-report/
Damn... That probably explains the look on Lauda's face after that 1:26.4 lap.
i had an awesome weekend at the f1 despite the boring race
Spent Saturday on the skydeck watching qualifying. Sunday went for a pit walk 2 hours before the race. Then watched the race standing 2 metres from charlize theron! I have pics if people care.
The experience was amazing. Just a shame about the race itself. It's going to be a long season unless something drastic happens
http://www.motorsportmagazine.com/f1/reports/2015-australian-grand-prix-report/
Damn... That probably explains the look on Lauda's face after that 1:26.4 lap.
Red Bull's consultant confirms that Renault is negotiating the purchase of Toro Rosso.
https://translate.google.com/transl...a-ter-equipe-propria-na-f1&edit-text=&act=url
Agree.If anything, coming out and categorically stating that Wolff is not in line to replace Bottas if needed has harmed the team image. To me, it's a clear sign that Williams see her as nothing more than good PR. Why else would you not even consider promoting her to a race seat when she's done the most miles in the car compared to anyone outside the race drivers?
Which is a real shame.
Asked how come Mercedes superiority had apparently stretched since last year, a senior team member wasnt convinced that it had. I think actually a lot of that was just Lewis. The cars superiority was probably more like how Nicos lap showed it maybe around 1sec. Lewiss was just an amazing lap in those conditions. Hes in the midst of contract negotiations and suddenly you see the difference that calibre of driver can make.
This alone might explain why I like Vettel more now that he's at Ferrari, I never did like the Red Bull team management. They come off as hypocrite cry babies that whine endlessly when they're not getting their way.smh at that Horner story. Embarrassing.
This alone might explain why I like Vettel more now that he's at Ferrari, I never did like the Red Bull team management. They come off as hypocrite cry babies that whine endlessly when they're not getting their way.
I think most of the complaining started arising when it became clear they were doing some very intelligent rule breaking. Now that Horner just got his ass kicked by a Sauber he's crying for equalization clauses, get the fuck out of here with that shit. None of the team managers to my knowledge were saying anything of the sort when RBR was winning. I can only imagine what Marko said after the race.I agree, and was thinking the same thing.
I briefly tried to look back to reports after the 2011 Australian GP to see if people were whining about RBR (since it would have been the start Seb's 2nd WDC year & RBR 2nd WCC). I only looked at one BBC report but didn't see anything in there, might look more later if I have time.
so what if Mercedes is dominating? How is this different from Red Bull a few years ago? The other teams just need time to get competitive - it'll come. Either they'll eventually all end up having Mercedes-like setups or everyone will move in a different direction.
And while I understand that might make things dull for people, I'm happy watching the races further down the field.
so what if Mercedes is dominating? How is this different from Red Bull a few years ago? The other teams just need time to get competitive - it'll come. Either they'll eventually all end up having Mercedes-like setups or everyone will move in a different direction.
And while I understand that might make things dull for people, I'm happy watching the races further down the field.
TV ratings are tanking.
It's only been one race but look how much Sauber and Ferrari turned things around in a single season. No reason RBR can't do the same, especially when their Jr. team is driving on the same (I think?) power units.
TV ratings are tanking.
Exactly. How the hell was I supposed to watch the Aus GP legit this weekend. Never paying for Sky Sports. F1 has moved to premium in a lot of counties.Probably has more to do with it being behind a paywall everywhere.
If this is the case then Horner needs to shut up, get that software update working and strap some more updates onto that car. I'm usually not too hard on teams, but RBR is always whinging about something. Even when they were dominating they were whinging about their engine. Even McLaren have been doing their best to be as PR friendly with Honda as much as possible, RBR is just very unprofessional in some ways.Sauber look a lot faster mostly because Renault completely fucked up an update to their engine. I really doubt they'll be in front of the Red Bull next race (probably not the Torro Rosso either).
Plus of course there's the Lotuses that didn't even get to do a lap.
Probably has more to do with it being behind a paywall everywhere.
so what if Mercedes is dominating? How is this different from Red Bull a few years ago? The other teams just need time to get competitive - it'll come. Either they'll eventually all end up having Mercedes-like setups or everyone will move in a different direction.
And while I understand that might make things dull for people, I'm happy watching the races further down the field.
Probably has more to do with it being behind a paywall everywhere.
Because unlike when Red Bull were dominating, there are arbitrary rules preventing the teams from properly closing that gap. Not Mercedes fault, they developed a superior engine design, but the token system doesn't allow enough change for Renault and Ferrari to replicate that. As Mercedes split turbo appears to be the most efficient way of generating power within the current rules and maximises the packaging of the car then it's almost impossible for Renault and Ferrari to catch up. Essentially the homologation in 2014 closed a 3 year win gate for Mercedes. They had the superior solution and the current rules prevent the usual F1 cycle of innovation and rampant copying.
At least when Red Bull were dominating teams could try to replicate their methods in season or by the next season. That isn't the case here.
And it's not that's it dull, it was dull when Vettel was running around with a RB car glued to the track, it's that the totality of so many years of limited competitiveness (even though the midfield battles have been very entertaining) coupled with Bernie et al hiving off all the money while selling out to pay tv have put the sport in a bit of a death spiral. Ratings are dropping like a stone, and with those ratings go the sponsors. There is simply too much money being taken out of the sport, and sponsorship which was keeping teams going is getting harder and harder to find. Removing the engine rules don't fix the money issue (in fact the added cost and potential for engine manufacturers leaving would probably make it worse) but those rules have inadvertently stifled competition and that's not going to change until 2017. Competitiveness brings excitement which may bring back the viewers. At the moment the most entertaining thing is guessing when the Honda engine is going to blow up.
It's a damn shame. As more people are cutting the cords, moving F1 behind more and more paywalls is going to have a very damaging effect on the future popularity i'm afraid. People are watching less TV the traditional way and more so the younger generation. I see fewer people growing in to F1 fandom if the trend continues. Sure, you may be making more money now Bernie, but at what cost to the future health of the sport?