JadedWriter
Member
Formula 1 2016 OT: Back in BlackFormula 1 2016 OT: Orange is the new Black
Formula 1 2016 OT: Back in BlackFormula 1 2016 OT: Orange is the new Black
If we want to be all political and tongue in cheek, we could go for :
Formula 1 2016 OT: Black liveries matter
If we want to be all political and tongue in cheek, we could go for :
Formula 1 2016 OT: Black liveries matter
OT should be 50 Shades of Grey then.I'm sure there's a word play to be had on "grey" or "bleak" if you want a pessimistic title.
Definitely leaning towards the 50 Shades of Grey one.
Almost 80 laps by Button.
Certainly a much more encouraging start to the season for McLaren after last year's disaster.
I don't know... if that story with them bringing a different engine upgrade for each week is true, we don't really have the bigger picture, this engine could be a slightly updated 2015 engine for all we knowAlmost 80 laps by Button.
Certainly a much more encouraging start to the season for McLaren after last year's disaster.
Almost 80 laps by Button.
Certainly a much more encouraging start to the season for McLaren after last year's disaster.
It wasn't completely dry this morning.
I don't know... if that story with them bringing a different engine upgrade for each week is true, we don't really have the bigger picture, this engine could be a slightly updated 2015 engine for all we know
Encouraging, certainly, but the real test is when everyone turns the wick up.
Ferrari dominant season incoming
Barcelona preseason test #1
day 1 final times
1) Vettel 1m24.939s
2) Hamilton 1m25.409s (+0.470s)
3) Ricciardo 1m26.044s (+1.105s)
4) Bottas 1m26.091s (+1.152s)
5) Celis 1m26.298s (+1.359s)
6) Button 1m26.735s (+1.796s)
7) Sainz 1m27.180s (+2.241s)
8) Ericsson 1m27.555s (+2.616s)
9) Wehrlein 1m28.292s (+3.353s)
10) Grosjean 1m28.399s (+3.460s)
11) Palmer 1m29.356s (+4.417s)
And lap count for day 1
Hamilton - 156
Ericsson - 88
Ricciardo - 87
Button - 84
Bottas - 80
Vettel - 69
Celis - 58
Sainz - 55
Wehrlein - 54
Palmer - 37
Grosjean - 31
9) Wehrlein 1m28.292s (+3.353s)
10) Grosjean 1m28.399s (+3.460s)
11) Palmer 1m29.356s (+4.417s)
I'm sure there's a word play to be had on "grey" or "bleak" if you want a pessimistic title.
That Merc power.
Mercedes clearly just loaded that thing up with fuel and are just pounding laps looking for reliability problems.For reference:
Full combined results from four days of pre-season 2015 F1 testing in Jerez, Spain.
1. Kimi Raikkonen Finland Ferrari-Ferrari 1m 20.841s 200 laps
2. Sebastian Vettel Germany Ferrari-Ferrari 1m 20.984s 149 laps
3. Felipe Nasr Brazil Sauber-Ferrari 1m 21.545 197 laps
4. Nico Rosberg Germany Mercedes-Mercedes 1m 21.982s 308 laps
5. Marcus Ericsson Sweden Sauber-Ferrari 1m 22.019s 185 laps
6. Lewis Hamilton Britain Mercedes-Mercedes 1m 22.172s 208 laps
7. Felipe Massa Brazil Williams-Mercedes 1m 22.276s 144 laps
8. Valtteri Bottas Finland Williams-Mercedes 1m 22.319s 134 laps
9. Max Verstappen Netherlands Toro Rosso-Renault 1m 22.553s 170 laps
10. Pastor Maldonado Venezuela Lotus-Mercedes 1m 22.716s 137 laps
http://www.crash.net/f1/results/214427/1/jerez-f1-test-times-combined.html#PEoRWg3ALCefXuVJ.99
Reverse grids are a joke, wouldn't everyone try to be as slow as possible so as to be on "pole" ? lol, knowing F1 it would definitely end up like that...
Mercedes clearly just loaded that thing up with fuel and are just pounding laps looking for reliability problems.
Hence you award points for Qualifying. I really like all three suggestions, but I'm also not vehemently against sprinklers either and would reduce free practice to zero. I want to see drivers make mistakes when it counts or being able to take a higher risk when not knowing the limits of the track perfectly well and thus shaking up the predictability of the field for a bit. Oh well...
Yeah at times testing rarely truly shows the pecking order. It helps you see who's going to be reliable, but even that's not always the case. McLaren 2011 and Red Bull 2014 kind of proved that wrong. Deadly accurate with Honda last year though.Whereas Ferrari needed to know if their radical design would actually go quick.
Reverse grids don't go on qualifying, they go on last race result. Generally when a league has a sprint and feature race in the same weekend.
Reverse grids don't go on qualifying, they go on last race result. Generally when a league has a sprint and feature race in the same weekend.
Renault has Mercedes power now? Red Bull must be so pleased.
Any bets on which car will break down first during testing?
Either the Honda or something Renault powered. Not even worth betting on.
It might be too tight back there, you never know, but I wasn't counting on them having problems. They're using last years Ferrari engine right? They might have problems adapting the package due to the size differences.Weirdly enough, it was the Toro Rosso with the gearbox issue.
They do have a great rear package, though.
Button said:It is difficult to say in terms of power because this won't be the engine we take to the first race. The deployment is so much better. I don't know if it is the same as the other guys have but it feels like it is. That is a big step for us.
Purple tyre, best tyre.
That Toro Rosso rear is TIGHT.
THIS WILL BE THE YEAR, BROT! I CAN FEEL IT IN MAH SOOOUUUUULLLLL!
FERRARI WORLD CHAMPIONS!!!!
From the feedback he's given out, it seems like the McLaren Honda package in general is much more refined in terms of integration, and that both chassis and engine are responding positively to the small amount of changes they have done so far. I'm looking forward to seeing what Honda bring in the next few weeks, but I think we might be able to say that they're certainly on par with the Renault now.