Ha, I just saw the 2006 pole time.
1:14.648
Suspect it'll be a long ass time before we get back there.
The circuit had the old layout for the penultimate corner back then. It's a chicane now which adds a load more time.
Ha, I just saw the 2006 pole time.
1:14.648
Suspect it'll be a long ass time before we get back there.
Honda have sacked Arai and Sato for their failures over the past year, announcement to be made today according to Autosport.pt
Ha, I just saw the 2006 pole time.
1:14.648
Suspect it'll be a long ass time before we get back there.
I wonder if anyone this year would choose usofts on an unsuitable track like this (depending on Pirelli's selection) for the quali benefit fully expecting to do a mega short first stint?
Actually, the only thing they've proven is that by having a severely more powerful engine package is such an advantage, that aero is fairly insignificant by comparison.
This is further proven by Red Bull and Toro Rosso last year, who are both said to have some of the best aero packages on the grid, completely crippled by a slightly lacking power unit.
The circuit had the old layout for the penultimate corner back then. It's a chicane now which adds a load more time.
The Red Bull looks incredible. The paint finish is just....
hhnnnnggg
Meanwhile. Ferrari looks like absolute shit
The Red Bull looks incredible. The paint finish is just....
hhnnnnggg
Meanwhile. Ferrari looks like absolute shit
Lunch break.
How about we call it here and award the championship based on this list?
Nothing looks better than a dirty race car:Interested in how they'll clean the matte paint between sessions. It's notoriously difficult to clean on road cars without polishing it out.
On a similar topic, I wonder if anyone has considered textured surfaces for aero benefit before? I know that dimples can improve aerodynamics - like a golf ball.
I remember reading about the manufacturer of suits for downhill skiers testing something similar based on the texture of shark skin.
That seems like curious timing. Why do it just before the start of the season? I could have understood right at the end of the previous one - getting fresh leadership into the Christmas break but right now it seems like the result can only be negative.
Well, unless it was effectively implemented last year and is only official now (gardening leave?)
You do not shame Honda racing or the dinosaur legends ex-Honda F1 engineers will get you.They hold so much power just like the old man!
What this states is that Honda is run by the wrong people at the moment. yes man over get it done men.
So a rogue r&d team with backing from the dinosaurs on their own time did a better job than the present F1 engineering team!
The final straw for him was the new TC designed by the 'Rogue R&D Engineers supported by retired ex-Honda F1 Engineers' won the internal comp!
Arai was 100% against their design so they did it behind his back with the blessing of the F1 Legends.
This is why it will not be ready until the first race.
Arai was just thick headed and was going to stick with last years failed design....keep on doing the say thing thinking it will do better cost him his job!
At least McLaren are putting a lot of laps. Usually when it comes to pre season testing this is much more important than lap times.
Lunch break.
If I'm reading this right, Wehrlein in the Manor improved last year's spanish Manor qualifying time by over 5 seconds?
If I'm reading this right, Wehrlein in the Manor improved last year's spanish Manor qualifying time by over 5 seconds?
Yep, 5.3s. That's a hell of a gain!
Mercedes testing some interesting aero solutions today
@LewisHamilton
Roscoe tried to take the #w05 but his feet couldn't reach the pedals, bless him...���� @mercedesamgf1 #puppypower
And Mercedes is the only team that so far used only medium compound
When I see the amount of laps they're putting down and compare them to Ferrari, I'm getting really worried again. I know they're on different schedules and whatnot, but most teams came with an evolution of the previous car, while Ferrari went mental again.
Someone hold me.
Probably overthinking it. Although Mercedes seem to not be rising to the bait and being sensible.
Probably overthinking it. Although Mercedes seem to not be rising to the bait and being sensible.
Mercedes testing some interesting aero solutions today
When I see the amount of laps they're putting down and compare them to Ferrari, I'm getting really worried again. I know they're on different schedules and whatnot, but most teams came with an evolution of the previous car, while Ferrari went mental again.
Someone hold me.
You don't win titles if you take no risks.
Mercedes knows they have it in the bag. Last year they never used the super soft during the entire 12 days of testing.
@tgruener: Heard some rumours the #F1 strategy group agreed on McLaren proposal on 2017 #F1 car that has a chassis width of 160cm. #F1 #AMuS
Rosberg at 115 laps already with 2 hours and 15 minutes to go. Alonso also in triple digits
Renault done for today.
I just cannot imagine what kind of panic would they create with low fuel run on ultra softs. Autosport forum would be down for whole week.
The sport got rid of Maldonado just in time.
They're going to keep the illusion of a competition until the first race after which we'll get 2-3 months of promised upgrades from the usual suspects which won't close the gap at all. After which Hamilton and Rosberg will be comfortably ahead of the pack and everyone will start talking about next year.
Hard to accidentally set a lap that fast when your car is completely full of fuel.
Ah, touche'. If it wasn't painfully obvious at this point, I've only been able to check in on the results of testing a couple times throughout the day. Missed that they were keeping a full load of fuel.
I am afraid.
I've got a mate who says it'll be 'closer' this time around.
If by closer he means that Ferrari will win four races instead of three he's right.
Mercs already have it. The only question is if Lolberg can challenge #blessed.