XiaNaphryz
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Just discovered this site which has a bunch of ship blueprints. Including some fanmade monstrosities such as this one:
Can't be worse than the "Squirtle" class federation fightercraft:XiaNaphryz said:Just discovered this site which has a bunch of ship blueprints. Including some fanmade monstrosities such as this one:
DrForester said:Few things about The Borg
They were originally going to be an insect race, to continue the story arc from TNG season 1 with the parasites that tried to take over Starfleet. But it was deemed too expensive.
Enterprises take on the Borg was creative (even if it was just spun off from a WIlliam Shatner book). They essentially wrote that they were remains/survivors of the Borg Sphere from First Contact and were frozen in the ice. This also worked because the writers admitted that in TNG The Borg knew about the Federation (And The Federation high ups already knew about The Borg). This idea also found it's way to the DS9 writers who said that they never found a good place to write in that the Dominion knew about the Federation but was not expecting a conflict with them for hundreds of years and the Wormhole changed that.
Shartner's "Kirk Returns" books did the same thing before Enterprise did, but took it in an even more creative direction. The Borg attack on Earth in the past in First Contact resulted in Mankind becoming paranoid and militaristic, and that was the creation point for the Mirror Universe's Terran Empire.
ManDudeChild said:My problem with the Enterprise episode is that even w/ all you've said ... it makes no sense. Watch Star Trek: Voyager (S06E07) Dragons Teeth and listen to what the alien says about the Borg. That when his species was awake (900 years ago, which is BEFORE First Contact) the Borg were just a nuisance. So unless the Borg episode on Enterprise happened in the 15th century, well yeeaah.
But some 24th-century Borg time-displaced into the 21st/22nd century has nothing to do with the 15th century Borg. No discrepancy.ManDudeChild said:My problem with the Enterprise episode is that even w/ all you've said ... it makes no sense. Watch Star Trek: Voyager (S06E07) Dragons Teeth and listen to what the alien says about the Borg. That when his species was awake (900 years ago, which is BEFORE First Contact) the Borg were just a nuisance. So unless the Borg episode on Enterprise happened in the 15th century, well yeeaah.
With the blockbuster new Star Trek movie, the history of the future of Earth has been rewritten... or has it?
There's a new Star Trek online role playing game hitting soon, and the creators have released two videos detailing the background and history that informs the game. Star Trek Online takes place 30 years after Star Trek: Nemesis, the last Next Generation movie, and the two videos fill in the gaps between that movie and the game. But while the Romulan star empire plays a major role in that history, there's no mention of the destruction of the Romulan homeworld, Remus, which according to Star Trek takes place right after Nemesis.
This is 100% not a big deal. It has no impact or bearing on anything and only two kinds of people should care about this: hardcore Trek fans and people fascinated with how big modern mythologies play out. In this case I'm in the second camp, and it's interesting to see that the game ignores the new continuity and keeps going ahead in the old. This could mean that the Star Trek franchise has fractured into two halves: the new, sexed up continuity, which will appeal to the masses, and the old continuity, which will continue to be explored in books, games, comics and other non-canon ephemera.
If that's the case it's brilliant on Paramount's part. Nobody's going to pay to see Next Generation or Voyager or DS9 movies. But there is a large population who will pay to read books or play games set in that continuity, and there will likely be a steady stream of product for those people. Paramount's having its cake and eating it too - a hot new franchise brings in the big bucks while the stodgy old nerdy franchise is a reliable moneymaker on its own.
beelzebozo said:
He sounds confused.UPDATE: Some folks have let me know that the game does take into account the destruction of Romulus. The big question, I guess, is does it take into account the destruction of Vulcan in the new movie? I suspect not (although lord knows I could be wrong again), meaning this is still an alternate reality continuity.
Raydeen said:Fuck Star Trek. It was a decent movie - but one average script covered up by great direction and casting doesn't erase over 30 years of TV shows / movies / books.
Raydeen said:Fuck [Tobor]. [He] was a decent [GAffer] - but one average thread covered up by great [intention] and [witty writing in the OP] doesn't erase over [3] years of [replying] / [quoting] / [editing].
.Tobor said:Ok. :lol
Dax01 said:.
No, I don't have any idea where I'm going with this.
Raydeen said:Fuck Star Trek. It was a decent movie - but one average script covered up by great direction and casting doesn't erase over 30 years of TV shows / movies / books.
Teh Hamburglar said:wait what?
Sir Fragula said:Can't be worse than the "Squirtle" class federation fightercraft:
http://www.the-blueprints.com/bluep...t-fighters/31886/view/squirtle_(ncc-f-90000)/
Can I get a JJ Anit-Burglary System (JJABS) with that?Tobor said:Apparently, JJ Abrams snuck in his house and erased over 30 years of TV shows / movies / books.
Make sure you JJ proof your windows and doors, people.
Zabka said:He added an update:
He sounds confused.
Link Man said:Ooh, good, this thread is back. I've got a question:
How does Star Trek handle artificial gravity, since the starships don't use centrifugal force?
Advanced technology.Link Man said:Ooh, good, this thread is back. I've got a question:
How does Star Trek handle artificial gravity, since the starships don't use centrifugal force?
Link Man said:Ooh, good, this thread is back. I've got a question:
How does Star Trek handle artificial gravity, since the starships don't use centrifugal force?
CiSTM said:I want to know why they don't have seatbelts :lol Their runabouts are always shaking like crazy and people are flying around 'em when ever under fire so why no seatbelts ?
CiSTM said:I want to know why they don't have seatbelts :lol Their runabouts are always shaking like crazy and people are flying around 'em when ever under fire so why no seatbelts ?
Zenith said:darn it, there's actually an early episode or movie where someone straps into a harness but I can't remember which one.
also graviton mesh woven into every floor.
How does Star Trek handle artificial gravity, since the starships don't use centrifugal force?
I liked how they handled this on a show Defying Gravity. Beneath their regular clothes, they wear skin tight clothes with nanofibers made partially out of metallic strands. Then the ship's floor uses some amount of electromagnetic force to pull the clothes down (and the person wearing them). Is something like this really feasable? It just seemed like a neat and relatively easily achievable, practical idea.Link Man said:Ooh, good, this thread is back. I've got a question:
How does Star Trek handle artificial gravity, since the starships don't use centrifugal force?
Lord Error said:I liked how they handled this on a show Defying Gravity. Beneath their regular clothes, they wear skin tight clothes with nanofibers made partially out of metallic strands. Then the ship's floor uses some amount of electromagnetic force to pull the clothes down (and the person wearing them). Is something like this really feasable? It just seemed like a neat and relatively easily achievable, practical idea.
I think showers and personal quarters were on four pods of the ship that were attached to long, rotating arms, so the gravity there was natural so to speak, and they could sleep without those special tights.chuckddd said:What do you do when you need to take a shower?
Lord Error said:I think showers and personal quarters were on four pods of the ship that were attached to long, rotating arms, so the gravity there was natural so to speak, and they could sleep without those special tights.
There was nothing like that in the show. It's was pretty much just a couple of people on the ship in our solar system, hard sci-fi kind of thing. Nothing in it was breaking any laws of physics that we know today I think, except maybe for faster than light communication, and some alien life form / object they were looking for, that had some supernatural abilities that noone could understand.CiSTM said:What about the aliens who just suddenly beams in to their ship ? Or is this magnet thing common knolage and every race prepares for it ?
they are so advanced they don't need no stinking seatbeltsCiSTM said:I want to know why they don't have seatbelts :lol Their runabouts are always shaking like crazy and people are flying around 'em when ever under fire so why no seatbelts ?
The lives saved from red shirts flying into things would be offset by the lives lost due to red shirts stuck in their seats while the consoles nearby them explode in their faces.Enosh said:they are so advanced they don't need no stinking seatbelts
lets ignore for a moment that seatbelts would probably have saved over 30% of all the red shirts dying on the various shows (most obvious contender for "why the fuck don't we use this anymore" being the guy that died in nemesis)
Lord Error said:There was nothing like that in the show. It's was pretty much just a couple of people on the ship in our solar system, hard sci-fi kind of thing. Nothing in it was breaking any laws of physics that we know today I think, except maybe for faster than light communication, and some alien life form / object they were looking for, that had some supernatural abilities that noone could understand.
*edit* I see, you're probably talking about Star Trek, but I was just asking an O/T question about feasability of such artificial gravity system. It's not what they used on Star Trek though, ST probably had some gravity generating/controlling device that would create artificial gravity by making gravitons or whatever.
Link Man said:Ooh, good, this thread is back. I've got a question:
How does Star Trek handle artificial gravity, since the starships don't use centrifugal force?
missbreedsiddx said:Got bored and decided to make an evil me facebook account. One of my evil counterparts facebook pictures...
yes..im TERRIBLE at photoshop.
Teh Hamburglar said:Photoshop? That shits MS Paint.
Could be Paint.net.Teh Hamburglar said:Photoshop? That shits MS Paint.
Tobor said:Seatbelts? We don't need no stinking seatb...
That's James Worthy of Los Angeles Lakers (and UNC) fame.Zenith said:Just wanted to introduce people to the funniest Klingon ever on the show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcMpIAtXW00&#t=2m50s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcMpIAtXW00&#t=4m50s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcMpIAtXW00&#t=7m38s
I had no recollection of him until I recently re-watched this ep.
aaa star trekScreaming_Gremlin said:Exactly, just like we don't any damn fuses in our work consoles.
Tobor said:Apparently, JJ Abrams snuck in his house and erased over 30 years of TV shows / movies / books.
Make sure you JJ proof your windows and doors, people.