Dot50Cal said:
That would explain why the PS3 version looks blurry and the 360 sharper.
Dot50Cal said:
WTF! Have you got the original vid that is from?2real4tv said:
Jtyettis said:Resolution plus better frame rate plus sharper image, indeed. Of course, I'm huge on framerate.
pswii60 said:Is anyone actually bragging? I thought this was all just a bit of fun.
Jtyettis said:Resolution plus better frame rate plus sharper image, indeed. Of course, I'm huge on framerate.
IN THE YEAR 1992...Segata Sanshiro said:You know, I didn't think I'd ever find anything more annoying than a frame counter, but pixel counters probably beat them.
Segata Sanshiro said:Ahahahahaha Mortal Kombat SNES runs at 256x224? Not the Genesis' 320x224? Fanboys am cry, so much for "448p."
plagiarize said:best quote Quaz for the full effect.
throws another barrel of gasoline onto the fire
no... it's brilliant. the two games appear to have such a different look that anyone can convince themselves that they prefer either the more dreamy lighting and smoother look of the PS3 version, or the more painted higher res look of the 360 version.Yoboman said:It's bizarre that a multiplatform game seems to have split into two different approaches here. 360 just being high-res, pretty bare and straight forward about it but then the PS3 team shrinking the res but improving the lighting and post-processing because of it. Maybe those Sony Cambridge programmers were teaching Rockstar a few tricks
Orly?Yoboman said:It's bizarre that a multiplatform game seems to have split into two different approaches here. 360 just being high-res, pretty bare and straight forward about it but then the PS3 team shrinking the res but improving the lighting and post-processing because of it. Maybe those Sony Cambridge programmers were teaching Rockstar a few tricks
This.plagiarize said:no... it's brilliant. the two games appear to have such a different look that anyone can convince themselves that they prefer either the more dreamy lighting and smoother look of the PS3 version, or the more painted higher res look of the 360 version.
everyone can now just go 'i like the way the X version looks' and no one can argue that with facts or anything.
i'm not reading this thread to find out which version of the game to get. i'm reading it for entertainment.Loudninja said:SO if this the case, umm why does it matter than?
Karma said:That would explain why the PS3 version looks blurry and the 360 sharper.
Loudninja said:SO if this the case, umm why does it matter than?
Dot50Cal said:Quaz won't lie dude, and he'll tell you flat out if the image is too poor quality to make out the resolution.
:lolplagiarize said:no... it's brilliant. the two games appear to have such a different look that anyone can convince themselves that they prefer either the more dreamy lighting and smoother look of the PS3 version, or the more painted higher res look of the 360 version.
everyone can now just go 'i like the way the X version looks' and no one can argue that with facts or anything.
According to Quaz51. Did you read the post?szaromir said:Orly?
Do you spend all your GAF time criticising other people's posts?mabuza said:i knew jtyettis would pop into this thread immediately he saw a glimmer of hope. time to stop crying and start celebrating. 631 baby wooot!!!
Darunia said:aaah here it goes
insanity has been given yet ANOTHER free pass, here come another 30 pages
plagiarize said:i'm not reading this thread to find out which version of the game to get. i'm reading it for entertainment.
the more twists and turns that happen... the longer the hilarity continues.
630p guaranteed this wasn't going to wind down any time soon, and THAT is why it matters.
It is a bullet point war; final result doesn't matter as long as bullet point list is longer.
Come on Gametrailers! please hurry with the comparison video.
mabuza said:i knew jtyettis would pop into this thread immediately he saw a glimmer of hope. time to stop crying and start celebrating. 631 baby wooot!!!
pswii60 said:Do you spend all your GAF time criticising other people's posts?
It DOESNT. Thats the whole point. Theres so much mis-information, from both the reviewers and everyone. Seriously, just pick whatever platform you have the most friends on.Loudninja said:SO if this the case, umm why does it matter than?
Balthier said:Quaz isn't lying it's the image that's crap. for all we know they could have captured it from the comparison video. I suggest waiting
Loudninja said:SO if this the case, umm why does it matter than?
chico said:630p?
inferior ps3 version confirmed...
/thread
Stop endorsing the 360 version.Dot50Cal said:Seriously, just pick whatever platform you have the most friends on.
plagiarize said:everyone can now just go 'i like the way the X version looks' and no one can argue that with facts or anything.
Zedsdeadbaby said:Why are you lying in the corner in a foetal position ?
both were probably the 'best' for each platform. depending on whats going on, we can't be sure how fill intensive each effect would be. i'm sure Rockstar did a bunch of tests for both to see what combination of effects and resolutions gave the best look and the best performance.f@luS said:630P VS Better effects + better loadings + Less clipping + less texture morphing
And as for framerate, i still dont know shit , many says ps3 is better, some 360 is. It means it has to be quite close
What i dont understand is that why isnt the 360 one like the ps3 one with 630p or the PS3 version like xbox with more defaults but 720p rez?
My thread: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=209038pswii60 said:WTF! Have you got the original vid that is from?
Zedsdeadbaby said:(I own both versions and can't tell the difference)
Yes I did. He clearly is good at counting pixels, but not an expert in graphics department in general (not referring to this particular case). Plus it's not like he has access to both games. He simply stated that he prefers the look of the PS3 version, but isn't sure why.Yoboman said:According to Quaz51. Did you read the post?
They're both shit. Just wait for Saints Row 2.h3ro said::lol
Wait... so both 360 and PS3 versions are teh inferiorz?
h3ro said::lol
Wait... so both 360 and PS3 versions are teh inferiorz?
PC VERSION BABYh3ro said::lol
Wait... so both 360 and PS3 versions are teh inferiorz?
Will 630P be any different?In fact, if you do a comparison shot between the native 1152x640 image and the scaled 1280x720, it's practically impossible to discern the difference. We would ignore it entirely were it not for the internet's propensity for drama where none exists. In fact the reason we haven't mentioned this before in weekly updates, is the simple fact that it would have distracted conversation away from more important aspects of the game, and given tinfoil hats some new gristle to chew on as they catalogued their toenail clippings.
plagiarize said:everyone can now just go 'i like the way the X version looks' and no one can argue that with facts or anything.
_leech_ said:I think both the 360 and PS3 do a pretty good job at scaling. Still though, less than 720p is disappointing (no different than the Halo 3 situation, imho).
doesn't it have to be confirmed to exist before it can win?Crushed said:PC VERSION BABY
PC WINS PC WINS PC WINS
chico said:630p?
inferior ps3 version confirmed...
/thread
_leech_ said:I think both the 360 and PS3 do a pretty good job at scaling