Count Dookkake
Member
Still hopeful I see. You think Harry was trolling?
He's done it other films, including the LOTR trilogy.
We'll see!
Still hopeful I see. You think Harry was trolling?
Ms. Walsh and Ms. Boyens, a former teacher and hard-core Tolkien fan, said part of the solution came from Tolkiens appendices to The Lord of the Rings. Those materials helped the writers create a bigger part for Gollum, a fan favorite, and explain the relationship between Gandalf and Thorin, an exiled king played by the British actor Richard Armitage.
Gonna rewatch all EE movies in the next 3 days.
Edmond Dantès;44985572 said:Gollum
I'm not quite sure if Iwant to see more of Gollum than in the Riddles in the Dark scene. He has his part to play as do other characters who are pretty much obstacles in the way of Bilbo and company. Once overcome we see nothing more of them as the narrative progresses, but it's the implications of their deaths/defeats that adds to and continues the narrative.
started 2 days ago. man, some of the effects in two towers did not age well, at all. gollum looked far worse than i remembered.
I have read that it looks like:Edmond Dantès;44985572 said:Gollum
I'm not quite sure if Iwant to see more of Gollum than in the Riddles in the Dark scene. He has his part to play as do other characters who are pretty much obstacles in the way of Bilbo and company. Once overcome we see nothing more of them as the narrative progresses, but it's the implications of their deaths/defeats that adds to and continues the narrative.
My guess is that they will include Gandalfs and Aragorns hunt for Gollum in the second or third film.
I still love Gollum
I have read that it looks like:The hunt for gollum from the old bridge film is in film 2/3 with Radagast filling in the Aragorn role.
Gollumn should have never been so CG to begin with. Makes him feel like Roger Rabbit when he's around. The ring made his eyes four times bigger, really? He looks like a cartoon.
Edmond Dantès;44985913 said:But Aragorn would be either 27 or 10 depending on what timeline they use and recasting Aragorn isn't something I expect to happen.That makes sense, or it could be Elrond who also goes exploring with Gandalf as it looks like Radagast goes off to Dol Guldur in the 'Smaug' TV spot by himself.
I always assumed his eyes stayed as they were and his head started shrinking with time.
The depiction of Gollum in The Hobbit (1977) is also quite unnerving.I adore Andy Serkis's performance and the movie Gollum is perfect at what it is but I never found him scary (outside of the scene in ROTK showing him crawling into the Misty Mountains and eating that fish, ironically one of the few parts where Serkis played gollum with just makeup). The book gollum was far more scary and less comic relief. I prefer book gollum in that way.
I will always adore this Golllum. I enjoy and appreciate what Serkis has done, but it is not the same and does not hold a place in my heart like this one.Edmond Dantès;44986456 said:The depiction of Gollum in The Hobbit (1977) is also quite unnerving.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLssei0sId0
I will always adore this Golllum. I enjoy and appreciate what Serkis has done, but it is not the same and does not hold a place in my heart like this one.
Haven't read any of the above spoiler text but concerning Gollumis he likely to be in the other two films as well?
Haven't read any of the above spoiler text but concerning Gollumis he likely to be in the other two films as well?
Edmond Dantès;44988053 said:Yes, in some capacity.
He's the narrator.
He's the narrator.
Joanclair Richter ‏@joanclairme
Hobbit screening - visually stunning. The beginning of it all. Peter Jackson Q & A - what a mind!
Matthew P. Spill ‏@matthewspill
Hobbit was great! 48fps is weird. Neat but not necessary. Can't wait for next December!
Jason T. Clark ‏@Jason_T_Clark
#Hobbit was fantastic!!! So happy to be back in Middle-Earth. This is a must see. 48Fps is interesting, but overall I didn't care for it.
Jason T. Clark ‏@Jason_T_Clark
Also, 3D was some of the best I've seen. Looking forward to seeing it again in IMAX 3D
Nicholas DeNitto ‏@NicksMovies
Just saw The Hobbit and was STUNNED. See this movie in 3D at 48 FPS! It looks incredible!
Scott Squires ‏@scott_squires
#hobbit 3D 48fps works. Won't be confused with cheap video. Less stereo artifacts. Only a few shots with odd motion. (speed changes?)
Marques T. Owens ‏@mothemogul
@JonasRJakobsen It was good. Great beginning to a new trilogy. A bit goofy at times....
Brian Duffield ‏@BrianDuffield
I dug the hell out of The Hobbit. It's sillier but super fun.
Brian Duffield ‏@BrianDuffield
EASILY best blockbuster of 2012.
Antoi Antzoulides ‏@AntoiAntz
Wow. Just saw The Hobbit and I'm exhausted. They journey to middle earth has wiped me out!
My guess is that they will include Gandalfs and Aragorns hunt for Gollum in the second or third film.
No way it will be Aragorn though, that is why the rumors are saying it will be Radagast, Aragorn will be too young in these films for it since there is no longer a bridge film and all the extended material takes place within the time period of the Hobbit.Way back when they announced the "bridge film" this is what i wanted to see most. They have 10 weeks of extra filming next year so there's still hope i guess. a fool's hope.
First reactions from the screening in LA today.
Edit : So far, so good.
The best part about these reactions is that, even if they didn't like the 48fps, they still loved the film. Hopefully that's a sign that the varying reaction to the HFR won't have a negative impact on how the film is perceived.
True but they could still fudge it and sneak him in, they've made bigger changes before. Aragorn mentions that he's 87 in the two towers extended edition.No way it will be Aragorn though, that is why the rumors are saying it will be Radagast, Aragorn will be too young in these films for it since there is no longer a bridge film and all the extended material takes place within the time period of the Hobbit.
Meaning he would be about 20 in this. Viggo doesn't look 20. if they were recasting Aragon we'd know it by now. The radagast rumor seems to add up.True but they could still fudge it and sneak him in, they've made bigger changes before. Aragorn mentions that he's 87 in the two towers extended edition.
That's where the confusion starts. In the book Gandalf goes off on a quest for information after the initial meeting with Frodo, visits intermittently over the years then disappears altogether, by the time he reunites with Frodo 17 years have passed. That isn't the case in the film where it seems like he went off for a few months, maybe a year, but certainly not 17 years.True but they could still fudge it and sneak him in, they've made bigger changes before. Aragorn mentions that he's 87 in the two towers extended edition.
Which is why the rumor that gandalf goes on the hunt for gollum with radagast seems likely. Aragon just can't fit the time frame without recasting him as a teenager.Edmond Dantès;44993043 said:That's where the confusion starts. In the book Gandalf goes off on a quest for information after the initial meeting with Frodo, visits intermittently over the years then disappears altogether, by the time he reunites with Frodo 17 years have passed. That isn't the case in the film where it seems like he went off for a few months, maybe a year, but certainly not 17 years.
Going by the legendarium, Aragorn is 10 during the events of The Hobbit.
started 2 days ago. man, some of the effects in two towers did not age well, at all. gollum looked far worse than i remembered.
Edmond Dantès;44993043 said:That's where the confusion starts. In the book Gandalf goes off on a quest for information after the initial meeting with Frodo, visits intermittently over the years then disappears altogether, by the time he reunites with Frodo 17 years have passed. That isn't the case in the film where it seems like he went off for a few months, maybe a year, but certainly not 17 years.
Going by the legendarium, Aragorn is 10 during the events of The Hobbit.
Doesn't Frodo wait a little while after getting the ring before leaving as well?
In the movie it comes across as mere months or even weeks. In the book 17 years pass.There is a lapse between when Bilbo leaves and gives him the ring and when Gandalf comes to tell him, but that's portrayed in the movie.
Oops. Actually, I meant between when Gandalf tells him that it's Sauron's ring and when he leaves. I seem to recall Frodo bumbling around for a little while.There is a lapse between when Bilbo leaves and gives him the ring and when Gandalf comes to tell him, but that's portrayed in the movie.
Gollum in the HobbitI imagine him being a more confident and menacing Gollum. From the bit I've seen from Serkis's performance, I don't think he's going to make any drastic changes but it could have been interesting.could have been played differently than Gollum of the LotR. He has the ring (or at least thinks he does for the majority of his part), he hasn't been beaten and tortured in Mordor and he hasn't been captured by Aragorn.
Watching that, I just noticed a rather large flaw - the ring is decorated! This is a fancy ring, not the plain, unadorned band decribed in LotR. The animators should have done a bit more research...Edmond Dantès;44986456 said:The depiction of Gollum in The Hobbit (1977) is also quite unnerving.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLssei0sId0
In the movie it comes across as mere months or even weeks. In the book 17 years pass.
Oops. Actually, I meant between when Gandalf tells him that it's Sauron's ring and when he leaves. I seem to recall Frodo bumbling around for a little while.
I love all the glimpses of the prologue that we are getting. Going to be epic.
Oops. Actually, I meant between when Gandalf tells him that it's Sauron's ring and when he leaves. I seem to recall Frodo bumbling around for a little while.
It looks to beThere is some one sayingAnyway, seems to confirm that"The dragon is back", Gandalf perhaps?the glimpse of a dragon in the two most recent spots is indeed Smaug, and not some other random dragon from the Withered Heath.
He still looks pretty good except for where he touches the environment. When he grabs the hobbit's clothes and things like that it looks pretty bad.