frodo284 said:Serkis' Gollum hits the nail on the head in the 'Riddles in the Dark' scene. HIs performance always stunned me in the original trilogy, but he brought an even more chilling tone to the character which ties in nicely with the subplot surrounding these books/movies
Here's a fun fact for you then: The Hobbit and Return of the King had their animations outsourced to a company in Japan, a company that eventually became Studio Ghibli.I loooove the 1977 version so much! As a small child we had it on laserdisc and I watched it over and over. It pretty much single-handedly instilled an eternal love for all things fantasy into my being. Yes it is rather short and leaves out some bits but that aside i think it is a thing of beauty, i love the songs, animation and voice acting. Smaug is amazing in it and he will be the standard to which I hold the PJ version to.
Here's a fun fact for you then: The Hobbit and Return of the King had their animations outsourced to a company in Japan, a company that eventually became Studio Ghibli.
Edmond Dantès;44944298 said:Japanese press conference
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mApTmksvea4&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jWXevORaEo&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qjkNFau518&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsj9zcsgO1g&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl5xK9nGyzQ&feature=youtu.be
An 80 year standard being changed = jarring difference for people who have never watched movies any other way. News at 11.
I guarantee you there will be plenty of negativity because it is different. Change scares people and this isn't what they're used to in movies.
I think you can make a case for genuine taste differences on the subject. I mean, I've been playing games forever and I still don't like 60fps over 30 in some genres- it's not an adaptation/change thing at all. It's simply that, in an artistic medium like film, some imperfections will be preferred to perfection by some people.
Early days, but The Hobbit has scored 90 on the BFCA ratings after yesterdays screenings. Not that many have seen it yet so that might not be representitive of the overall opinion. Though it does at least mean that those critics that have seen it really liked it.
What? 60 fps is not only much smoother, but much more responsive as well. I don't know how anyone could prefer video games at lower fps
Edmond Dantès;44955664 said:
Build me an OT worthy of Hobdor.
Going to finish up my EE preparations tonight with RotK. I always hate finishing the trilogy, it makes me so sad.
Sorry if this has been answered already, but is the HFR only available in 3D?
My problem with recent action movies isn't choppy, blurry movement. It's the fact that a lot of directors hide budget constraints with shitty fucking shaky cam bullshit. I can't STAND watching movies on TV's with the 120hz/240hz crap turned on. It looks unnatural and jarring. Movies look better at 24 fps. It looks like a homemade movie with anything higher. I haven't seen 48fps movies though. Perhaps the fact that it isn't a hardware interpolation (TV interpolating frames) will make it so that it looks better.It's going to be so strange if most people end up hating 48fps... I still hope these reactions are just a fluke and that most people will adjust and in fact even prefer it as time goes on and more and more content adopts the format. It just seems natural to me that this is the direction things would be heading.
Maybe a lot of reviewers WILL end up hating it, but younger people won't, it's just that 24fps is what we've been used to all these years. I fucking hate watching any action movie anymore, I can't stand the choppy, blurry movement anytime something moves fast or the camera pans fast. I hope that with 48fps and 60fps this is partially solved.
I didn't think it would be THAT low...
Here's the one i'm attending. i should get around to calling them and quizzing them on the whole HFR IMAX thing and see what they can tell me about their theater and screen (i have yet to actually attend any showing at this location)
I loooove the 1977 version so much! As a small child we had it on laserdisc and I watched it over and over. It pretty much single-handedly instilled an eternal love for all things fantasy into my being. Yes it is rather short and leaves out some bits but that aside i think it is a thing of beauty, i love the songs, animation and voice acting. Smaug is amazing in it and he will be the standard to which I hold the PJ version to.
By the way, to anyone who has not seen the 1977 version I highly recommend you do so, please try to find the fan-version named the "Hi-Fi Hobbit" -- the official dvd release has an inferior audio track which leaves out a lot of the great sound effects and such. The Hi-Fi hobbit is a restoration of sorts, coupling the good DVD video with the audio from a hi-fi VHS tape. Not perfect but it's a good compromise and the best version we are likely to get.
Another question: is IMAX3D necessarily HFR as well? I can't seem to find any info on that. I've read things that make it seem like there is IMAX3D with and without HFR, but I can't confirm that.
Is IMAX 3D real IMAX (filmed and rendered at the large film size) or just the 35mm projected at IMAX size?
There is not one theater anywhere near me in Michigan playing it at 48fps. Fuck this state!
Is IMAX 3D real IMAX (filmed and rendered at the large film size) or just the 35mm projected at IMAX size?
Wait...!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CA8WzZq8_d0
HQtv-spot! Spoilerz.Smaug
Why didn't you say so!
Seeing it in HFR day one and then regular 2d the next week.
Don't really give a shit about the format, I'm just immensely excited for this movie and am planning on seeing it the way it was intended first
Wait...!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CA8WzZq8_d0
HQtv-spot! Spoilerz.Smaug
Why didn't you say so!
Not convinced thatWait...!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CA8WzZq8_d0
HQtv-spot! Spoilerz.Smaug
Why didn't you say so!
In The Wisdom of the Shire, Noble Smith sheds a light on the life-changing ideas tucked away inside the classic works of J.R.R. Tolkien and his most beloved creation—the stouthearted Hobbits.
Drawing on The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit, and other tales of Middle-earth, Smith shows how a snug Hobbit-hole is actually just a state of mind and how even the smallest person can have the valor of a Rider of Rohan. He explores subjects dear to a Halfling's heart, such as beer, food, and friendship, as well as more serious concerns, such as courage, living in harmony with nature, and good versus evil.
How can simple pleasures such as gardening, taking long walks, and eating delicious meals with friends make you significantly happier? Why is the act of giving presents on your birthday instead of getting them such a revolutionary idea? And how can we carry the burden of our own "magic ring of power" without becoming devoured by it? The Wisdon of the Shire holds the answers to these and more of life's essential questions.
HC: How did Peter Jackson’s decision to shoot the films at 48 frames per second impact you?
TL: We knew 48 frames for makeup is a nightmare. It just exposes everything, all of our little tricks that we used to get away with with 35 mm, all of our work is under a huge microscope. What we didn’t count on was the fact that working with the Epic camera, the colors transfer differently in the camera. So you’d look at the guys in makeup with the prosthetics on and seamless edges, the colors match perfectly. And then when we went to go look at it on the screen, we found out that the camera actually sucked out a lot of the red coloring in the prosthetics — and not just in the prosthetics but in the costumes and the set pieces and all that. We had to figure out how much red to kick back into the prosthetics in our paint job so it didn’t look yellow or jaundiced on screen. That was a huge learning curve. I don’t think the 48 frames was an issue, it was just how the color in the material transferred within the camera. I had to teach my crew to paint with that invisible eye. I was always in [cinematographer] Andrew Lesnie’s tent because there was only one color-corrected monitor on the set. It was a challenge every day.
Edmond Dantès;44963695 said:A reading recommendation for anyone who loves the Shire and the Hobbit way of life.
Not too tech savvy with all this 48fps talk so I'm guessing there is no way to view a sample online of how it will look? Not necessarily the hobbit but just any piece of film shot at 48fps.
Finishing my marathon of LOTR now with the extended return of the king. This is actually my first time watching the extended editions and why this hasn't really been much of a marathon as much as its been a slow sprint since I have only watched one film a week for the past 3 weeks.
Goddamn 4 hours! So much cool shit was cut out I cant believe it. They could have made 6 movies out of it all.
A gaffer has a RED camera?!? Aren't those mega bucks? I wouldn't mind seeing the footage but if its too much trouble then no big deal.We had a comparison that a GAFFER shot with his RED camera, but the link seems to have died.
I've still got the videos if somebody has somewhere I can upload it to.
Edmond Dantès;44963498 said:Not convinced thatis Smaug, doesn't seem the right colour and there were also other dragons still present in Middle-earth during that time period.
Wait...!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CA8WzZq8_d0
HQtv-spot! Spoilerz.Smaug
Why didn't you say so!