More comments on 48fps from some dude, also mentions there are basically
Calls the humor "goofy."
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/review-despite-a-self-indulgent-goofy-opening-the-hobbit-rallies-to-become-another-dazzling-action-adventure-epic-20121204
Just realized he wrote "per minute." THAT would suck.
2 prologues.
48 frames per minute is essentially harsh-looking and disconcerting...until it isn’t. It’s incredible how discordant and off-putting the increased frame rate appears to the human eye initially, but as Jackson himself has asserted, audiences will tend to forget (and or tolerate) once they’re absorbed into the story (though admittedly, it takes about a good hour and the experience will be both subjective and divisive). And becoming engaged in 'The Hobbit' once the adventure truly starts isn’t difficult. In fact, by the third act when the action is at its thunderous peak the 3D/48 fps visuals are wholeheartedly spectacular and ravishing. Indeed, a few moments of panoramic action vistas are as stunning and gorgeous as anything seen in “Avatar,” “Hugo” or “Life Of Pi.”
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/review-despite-a-self-indulgent-goofy-opening-the-hobbit-rallies-to-become-another-dazzling-action-adventure-epic-20121204
Just realized he wrote "per minute." THAT would suck.