bengraven
Member
Nope. Won't read it.
Same.
First time I haven't wanted a trailer spoilered.
Nope. Won't read it.
SourceBriefly: While its been reported before that the very first official trailer for Peter Jackson's The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, due out in December 2012, would be debuting in front of Adventures of Tintin starting next week, word is that it might be online the day before. USA Today is reporting that Warner Bros has set satellite premiere times, meaning they're ready to deliver this thing, for next Tuesday, December 20th. That likely means it'll be online that day, if not by Monday evening, so stay tuned next week as there will be a lot of big trailers hitting the web (The Dark Knight Rises, too). And as always, you know FS.net will be the first to post them as soon as they're officially available! In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit...
Edmond Dantès;33523253 said:
Who is doing the score?
Who is doing the score?
Too bad The Matrix Revolutions didn't live up to the hype of the trailer. Don't think we'll have that problem with either movie trailer releasing this year.Doesn't TDKR trailer also launch on Tuesday? Excellent.
The Hobbit will get the real hype going.
I still remember when everybody was anticipating the Return of the King trailer which had a firm date. Then out of nowhere WB decided to release the trailer for The Matrix Revolutions on the same day. That was a good day.
I am as well, but I was wondering: would that (or some kind of über Blu-ray box of both titles) actually be possible? The movies are distributed by Warner, this time around, aren't they? Would that cause some issues on that front?I'm actually okay with them eventually putting a 10 second clip of him grabbing the ring in the prologue of the LOTR.
I am as well, but I was wondering: would that (or some kind of über Blu-ray box of both titles) actually be possible? The movies are distributed by Warner, this time around, aren't they? Would that cause some issues on that front?
Ah, well, that solves it, I guess!Warner Bros. owns New Line.
The pictures aren't doing much for me, visually.
I've read The Hobbit, and in some ways I actually prefer it to The Lord of the Rings, but Jackson's original trilogy was so good and the scale of it all was just so huge..that I can't help but feel underwhelmed. I'm sure I'll be wrong.
I like that the this seems to feel a bit more like FotR..I love that movie. Each film definitely had its own flavour, and while I don't like any single part more than the other, I wouldn't object to a return to the more adventurous beats of Fellowship.
I hope they match Moria's scale along for all its darkness and grandeur. That part blew me away as a kid. Maybe the Misty Mountains will come close?
At the same time, I'm worried that my expectations are so coloured by the previous films.
I don't understand why you'd be concerned. The Hobbit is being filmed in the same epic style that TLOTR, everything is going to be bigger and better in this movie.
I don't understand why you'd be concerned. The Hobbit is being filmed in the same epic style that TLOTR, everything is going to be bigger and better in this movie.
I hope this has a much smaller scale then the LOTR films, not everything needs to have thousand man battles ever hour.
Didn't they say that they've already passed the budget of the WHOLE LotR trilogy for The Hobbit?
I'm liking those pictures too. It's going to be a great adventure.
All three LOTR movies cost $281 million, making just under $3 billion at the box office.
Both Hobbit movies total $500 million.
Didn't they say that they've already passed the budget of the WHOLE LotR trilogy for The Hobbit?
I'm liking those pictures too. It's going to be a great adventure.
Goddamn. Is it costing more because of the technology or because of the scale?
It can't be scale, right? (I've never read the Hobbit)
All three LOTR movies cost $281 million, making just under $3 billion at the box office.
Both Hobbit movies total $500 million.
Well, each of the LotR films had a separate budget of $100 million, for a total of $300 million. I could see both entries of the Hobbit having budgets of at least $150 million each, especially because Warner Bros. has to know these movies are going to make a shitload of money.
Bare in mind the latest Transformers and Pirates of the Caribbean films both had budgets of over $200 million.
They must be using one billion gamecubes duct taped together to produce the special effects.
The only problem I have is dwarfs. They don't look like dwarfs, but large men in big clothes, if you know what I mean.
The only problem I have is dwarfs. They don't look like dwarfs, but large men in big clothes, if you know what I mean.
Goddamn. Is it costing more because of the technology or because of the scale?
It can't be scale, right? (I've never read the Hobbit)
Yeah, but a lot of that was because of big name stars.
The Hobbit doesn't have a Johnny Depp or a LeBouf eating up budget.