There's plenty to bring up against Joel to judge if he's a moral person or not, his hunter days alone where he had to do things that still gives Tommy nightmares practically excludes him from being a "good" person. That's not to say he wasn't on path of redemption.
I really don't understand why you would think it would ever score anywhere near a 40, unless it was just completely broken.
i'm sorry but...what?
I'm tired and read his comment again, I'm pretty sure he meant above $40.
oh...since this is the review thread i thought it was the scores, lmao.
PianistaMacabro
if you were talking about price then forget my post above, lmao.
oh...since this is the review thread i thought it was the scores, lmao.
There's so much trolling at this point...who knows.
You don't understand how the remake of one of the best games of all time now featuring top class graphics has great scores?
so ppl reviews games nowadays by price tag? naismetacritic user scores
metacritic user scores
This is disgustingmetacritic user scores
then he calls it re-remaster and posts the smalles thumbnail sized comparison photo.
im enjoying myself it so far, even it was 3rd time i bought it ^^
metacritic user scores
Great way of starting a discussion. Unfortunalety looks like I know a little more than you what a review is.
I have a very good full surround home theatre setup and I find the overall volume to be noticeably low. -24 dB on my receiver volume is more than high enough on most content, to get the same volume from this game, it needs to be between -16 dB & -18 dB. Not sure why only for this game I have to crank it.
So you use language as an argument. Not gonna waste my time with that kind of person. You probably have english as first language and thinks you are the cooldude.
Well not exactly. He should be referred to as more of an anti hero. Which is what he is. He still takes on a hero's journey but instead of saving the world and making things better, he makes things worse for the entire human race. I'm not sure how they'll conclude this series though. I definitely think there will be a part 3 which will more than likely wrap the trilogy.
Eh, you'll have to make a lot positive assumptions for the Fireflies for that to work without any hints in the game showing it's possible.
That would be really interesting if they kill Ellie, create the vaccine but either keep it to themselves or use in some capacity to get what they want from another group.
Not really if they want to keep players invested in the story, there should be enough continuity with the newer part of the story or else there's the risk of losing players investment in the story.
All it did is doubting the Fireflies, you're making the strange leap from that to not wanting a hopeful future for humanity.
And yet that was the case for a while before Part II was announced, or at least that fatherly love can override reason/"the greater good"(something I doubt because of the way the Fireflies are present so far).
Not sure who you're talking to here since I said nothing about the Fireflies being done in the story, just that so far we don't know enough to judge if they have the capacity to cure the world with a vaccine.
That would require some build up for it not to come off as some sort of Deus Ex Machina happy ending where the world is cured. Here's where writer talent comes in to sell that part of the story.
Makes no sense. They wouldn't continue the story unless Ellie's immunity meant something.
I'm telling you how they're still building up to the cure storyline. You're focused on how it's nearly impossible while they're writing a story that's leading to the vaccine.
There was no long buildup for the Fireflies being established. We just knew they existed.
Maybe it was meant to be a bittersweet ending at first till they saw how popular the game became.
You're mistaken then, I'm saying we don't know enough so far. And if I have to make a snap judgement with what little's available then yeah it doesn't look good for the Fireflies. I'm not saying part 3 can't change that perception.
A terrorist group existing is not a big stretch, saying that group can also help cure millions with a vaccine is something that requires more than words to be believable IMO.
It was already great so I'm curious to check it out.
So far it's not. They're continuing with the story. The tease at the end of TLOU 2 was obvious.
You can change anything in fictional writing.
It doesn't require a lot of work.
Sure, a future Fireflies faction could have the capacity to cure the world, doesn't retroactively mean part 1 Fireflies could too.
They don't need to show it. As I said, it's a fictional story. Anything is possible. Their job was to create a vaccine. Disturbing that vaccine has many possibilities and doesn't have to be done overnight.
Neil Druckmann doesn't have to clarify I agree but in discussions about which side to root for at the hospital, it is an important detail that affects the favorability of one of the opposing sides.
