Having just played for over 2 hours the controls alone make this an imperfect game.
Lol
Having just played for over 2 hours the controls alone make this an imperfect game.
At the very least you'll need an axe. Did you get the one very very early on in the game?
Having just played for over 2 hours the controls alone make this an imperfect game.
For those of you worried about graphics and performance, this was me:
1st Hour - "Oh man, you can definitely notice the lack of AA. Frames could be a bit better in some spots. Colours look a bit washed out. It's good but man, imagine this at 1080p with AA and better FPS
By around hour 3 or 4: "This game is fucking amazing. Who gives a shit about AA or washed out colours, it looks amazing, it plays amazing, it feels amazing. Wow"
Genuinely that much of a swing. I can totally see why reviewers have seen past some of the hardware limitations because I certainly have. I can see myself falling in love with this game in no time and I bloody impulse bought it this morning!
Re performance, it seems better to me than the preview videos that I've seen in recent weeks. Day 0 patch might not be perfect but it looks to have done something. I only played docked by the way, will test handheld when I inevitably get kicked off the TV lol
You had literally the exact same experience as me. The IQ and performance really were an initial shock that dampened my enthusiasm, but the game design obliterated that utterly after about one or two hours.
If this doesn't reach 99 I refuse to waste my time with this joke of a game.
For those of you worried about graphics and performance, this was me:
1st Hour - "Oh man, you can definitely notice the lack of AA. Frames could be a bit better in some spots. Colours look a bit washed out. It's good but man, imagine this at 1080p with AA and better FPS
By around hour 3 or 4: "This game is fucking amazing. Who gives a shit about AA or washed out colours, it looks amazing, it plays amazing, it feels amazing. Wow"
Genuinely that much of a swing. I can totally see why reviewers have seen past some of the hardware limitations because I certainly have. I can see myself falling in love with this game in no time and I bloody impulse bought it this morning!
Re performance, it seems better to me than the preview videos that I've seen in recent weeks. Day 0 patch might not be perfect but it looks to have done something. I only played docked by the way, will test handheld when I inevitably get kicked off the TV lol
User score 7.8 guys
And they're putting quite the effort into it, I think there are some that even create new accounts just to downvote Zelda and some of the 0-1 Reviews are just hilarious:
User score 7.8 guys
The bolded is me all the time. Life is great when you play video games for the love of video games rather than the love of tech specs.
I'm so glad that you loved the game griss
Not sure if already posted but Digitalspy gave the game also 5/5. Crazy how we get every day more of these perfect scores.
Not as glad as I am
Seriously, this sets Zelda up to be one of the premier franchises in gaming again for a good long while. As a hardcore Zelda fanboy it was sad to see it drop from those heights. It's back, and it feels amazing.
hey look another good score for Zelda ATTACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!And they're putting quite the effort into it, I think there are some that even create new accounts just to downvote Zelda and some of the 0-1 Reviews are just hilarious:
Why did this rivalry between Zelda fans and Horizon fans develop?
Video games are technology. Gameplay is not the only thing that makes a game great. Technical performance is a piece of the package the same as story or music and should be judged when reviewing a game.
Unfortunately almost every reviewer has forgotten that.
And they're putting quite the effort into it, I think there are some that even create new accounts just to downvote Zelda and some of the 0-1 Reviews are just hilarious:
Sooooo Tetris has a shit story and shit graphics 0/10Video games are technology. Gameplay is not the only thing that makes a game great. Technical performance is a piece of the package the same as story or music and should be judged when reviewing a game.
Unfortunately almost every reviewer has forgotten that.
User reviews are useless but paid reviews are?
yeah cool.
I played it for 1.5 hours and love the controls.Having just played for over 2 hours the controls alone make this an imperfect game.
Not sure if any expectations of reviewers is fair.
I feel annoyed if a reviewer is willing to state that 'I don't give 10s' vibe or stance in a review but if they find good reason for a 9.5 I am fine with that.
I think as fans we need to respect reviews verdict even though we wanted them to love a game we are hoping is deserving of a perfect score. This is harder to do when the reviewer is someone you love to follow.
Example, I find myself uncomfortable with EZA's 4.5/5 because I am a big fan of those guys and wanted love / hype from those guys.
Waypoint's review filled that love and hype that I was hoping from EZA
Dan from Giantbomb also filled that spot.
So I think when you are a fan of reviewers and hyped for a game, you kinda want those reviewers not to play that 'I don't give 10s' game
So when it comes to a game like this we have high expectations which I am not sure is fair
At this point Nintendo would probably be losing profit if they've paid off everyone, lol
I think the problem is with reviewers who mention some things as negative for years -like framerate drops, certain gameplay mechanics or random stuff copied from previous open world games, etc.- in similar games (example: certain Horizon or Ubi games reviews) and score them with lower score. But when reviewing Zelda avoided to mention them and give it a 10.
Reviewers who also gave Skyward Sword or even Majora's Mask 3DS port a 10.
Your tears are delicious
I mean, even projared and egoraptor, youtubers that go very hard on 3d zeldas are saying that this is the best one in a while, many people that have no reason to be "paid" off are saying this.
Many outlets even say that of all publisher, is one of the best in terms of not really putting pushing for a score for their games.
It's strange to me, we have a game that people are saying that can be an all time classic and instead of getting excited, because it's from nintendo it can't possibly be a good game right?
Great argument! You're ignorant.
I don't know fanboys even bother shitting on Nintendo when they're clearly no threat to Sony/Microsoft.
Nice stealth troll.
Just an observation or call it my opinion... the mostly middle aged 30 year old men playing this game living out nostalgia in front of their eyes see these same inconsistencies in other games and take away points in reviews. But because the name "Zelda" is tied to it... I feel like the hyperbole and myopic vision is just way too much.
No game is perfect.
Someone in this thread already worded it quite well, no game is perfect,true, and a 10/10 doesn't mean exactly that. Get over it buddy, people think the game is amazing, that's their opinion.
I only have one question to you:
Did you play the game?
If yes, ok, it's your opinion after playing it.
If no, you only sound like a salty console warrior.
You're using difficult words for a ten year old, impressive.
But a 10 isn't perfect. Just like a 5/5 movie isn't perfect. The scale is 1-10. Does the game hit what it needs to to receive the highest score? As the poster you quoted said.. if someone "never gives a 10", then really they are only operating on a 9 point scale and their 9 is still a 10 anyway.
A 10 to me is that the game/movie/whatever hits all of the important notes, all of the nice touches, and as a whole (important there) doesn't leave me with thinking "it was REALLY good, but these 2-3 things really could have been better and were a little distracting". That's not to say there is NOTHING that could be done better in a 10/10... just to say that criticisms there, taken as a whole package, didn't reduce the experience at all for me. Wind Waker is a perfect example of a 9. If it weren't for the ridiculous amount of sailing before the start of the end journey, easy 10. Instead, 9. Red Daed Redemption on the other hand... 10. Even with the typical R* flaws, I spent 100+ hours in that game.
Though honestly I usually apply a 5 point scale to things. Nothing we are talking about ever needs more than that. And the 100 point scales used in the industry (including the 9.3 and such)? Ridiculous. Did you like it? If you can't express that across 5 ranks, then frankly you are doing a poor job of expressing your opinion.
Meh. If you haven't played the game yourself this is just a baseless assertion.
"Technical issues" vary in the degree they affect the overall experience.
The praise of Botw seems centered on the new things it does regarding gameplay systems and mechanics. Deviations from current formula. If anything, things like story and visuals are much more vulnerable to "hype".
I'm 30 and this is my first Zelda. The review scores are deserved after I played it for ~12 hours now. So it's definitely no nostalgia here.
Lol
Why all this Nintendo saltiness? I mean, they made a great new console, they made *possibly the greatest game ever made* for it as well - what's not to like?
And they're putting quite the effort into it, I think there are some that even create new accounts just to downvote Zelda and some of the 0-1 Reviews are just hilarious:
User score 7.8 guys
Amazing versus perfect are not the same thing. Experiences are subjective and that's fine if they think it's amazing, that's absolutely fine. If I'm going against the status quo, it doesn't mean I'm in the wrong. Jesus, I don't know who's saltier; the fanboys or Zelda fans.
If you read further down, I said I haven't played either of the 2 best games reviewed so far to put me in any console war fanboy crap. So what brings you to the conclusion that I'm a salty console warrior? Your assumption is misplaced.
Thanks for your argument. Very positive and personal. Bet you do great in debates.
You see I understand everything you're saying because your opinion is based off of your own personal experience, possible brand name and subjective enjoyment. I personally enjoy the reviews that usually don't state numbers but actual opinions on if its worth buying. Numbers are more marketing hype aren't they?
I'll get back to you on that after I've played it. I didn't make an assertion because that would imply that I'm 100% on my opinion of the game being bad. I made an assumption instead on the "brand" and "nostalgia" itself and everyone seems to be angry about it... I also subjective am of the opinion that nothing is perfect and that is for ALL games.
That's fantastic to hear. Your simple short review is something important to me because it's brand new into the world of Zelda. I have played prior Zelda games and they are quite fantastic. I however also feel you're 12 hours in so the hype hasn't settled down yet. Could you PM me later and tell me exactly how you feel after perhaps end game or 40 hours in? Thank you. I'd appreciate it.
That's fantastic to hear. Your simple short review is something important to me because it's brand new into the world of Zelda. I have played prior Zelda games and they are quite fantastic. I however also feel you're 12 hours in so the hype hasn't settled down yet. Could you PM me later and tell me exactly how you feel after perhaps end game or 40 hours in? Thank you. I'd appreciate it.
User reviews are useless but paid reviews are?
yeah cool.