The Legend of Zelda Skyward Sword HD | Switch VS Wii | Trailer Comparison
- Thread starter IbizaPocholo
- Start date
- Opinion Analysis Trailer
Hosam6xavi
Banned
Night and day difference
from release date of the original game it was obvious that the game needed HD treatment
from release date of the original game it was obvious that the game needed HD treatment
daclynk
Member
not 'Just HD' but with control options and 60FPS. The first 3D zelda to do so.
A Regular Guy
Banned
The game looks to have no textures change. But everything looks to have new lighting and Super Sampling
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
meh come on Nintendo!
Alebrije
Member
Its like Night and day difference in Alaska between may and july.
Rean no Kiseki
Banned
jakinov
Member
Activision would if they could. People charge less for things that are worth less. It's like comparing how many burgers you can get from the mediocre mom and pop shop versus the popular chain restaurant. No brand equity, and the average person enjoys it less. Activision has to be cheaper to get sales. Nintendo doesn't. Yeah Nintendo wants money. So does every other company.LOL.
Not even Activision is this greedy. They give you 3 games like this for $40:
Fbh
Member
True. I guess greedy is the wrong word. Every company is greedy and will try to get as much money from their products as they can. If Activision knew they could sell the Spyro trilogy for $80 and sell millions of units they would totally charge that.
With that said I own no Stock in any of these companies so how much money they make is irrelevant to me. As a consumer, I dislike Nintendo for their overpriced pricing practices and I think most big publishers offer more value for my money.
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
Another low effort port from Nintendo.
10/10.
10/10.
Fake
Member
lol
D.Final
Banned
I agree
Sir_Impaler
Neo Member
Same. I never owned a Wii or Wii U so I'd be interested in this title. Might wait though to see what comes of potential Zelda anniversary
Connificent
Al Pachinko, Konami President
The Wii needed HD at launch.
D.Final
Banned
True
A Elbereth Gilthoniel
Member
This honestly looks like a rather slapdash job.
The Skull
Member
LOL.
Not even Activision is this greedy. They give you 3 games like this for $40:
You seriously don't think Activision would charge as much as possible if the Spyro Franchise was as anywhere near as successful as Zelda? This isn't defending the pricing btw and, as much as I enjoy Zelda, I' not gonna shell out $60 for a resolution boost and 60 fps.
The Skull
Member
It's because it is. This game probably would have benefited from at the very least a Wind Waker HD esque style update.
akaFullmetal
Member
Just put down 2011 for 2020.
EverydayBeast
ChatGPT 0.001
Has backtracking been addressed? That's my question.
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
sales say otherwise.
Icymanipulator
Member
Game should be $40.
$60 is a joke especially if they plan on rereleasing WW and TP... they gonna charge $60 a pop for those too? Lmafo
$60 is a joke especially if they plan on rereleasing WW and TP... they gonna charge $60 a pop for those too? Lmafo
Connificent
Al Pachinko, Konami President
ThatOneGrunt
Member
This stuff is always amazing to me. I remember playing this game and thinking it looked good. Seeing it now, it looks almost unplayable to me. The framerate and resolution is god awful.
rubenburgt
Member
It's definitely HD, but I'm just afraid it will lose its style because of it.
Look, Skyward Sword had that feel as if it was painted. That was the style of the game. Looking at this video do I see sharper edges and hi-res textures.
I don't getting that 'painting' feeling anymore.
Look, Skyward Sword had that feel as if it was painted. That was the style of the game. Looking at this video do I see sharper edges and hi-res textures.
I don't getting that 'painting' feeling anymore.
Last edited:
Captain Toad
Banned
Idk. HD, in some ways, makes the game look even worse.
This game came out late on Wii, where we all were well use to HD games on PS360. They had to go a different route, so they chose this washed-out water-color style, that looked good enough at low resolution.
But, bringing that to HD, just shows more just how ugly this game is in comparison to the two Zelda games before it and the one that followed.
I have a feeling The Simpsons' Comic Book Guy and I share similar feeling about this particular 3D Zelda.
This game came out late on Wii, where we all were well use to HD games on PS360. They had to go a different route, so they chose this washed-out water-color style, that looked good enough at low resolution.
But, bringing that to HD, just shows more just how ugly this game is in comparison to the two Zelda games before it and the one that followed.
I have a feeling The Simpsons' Comic Book Guy and I share similar feeling about this particular 3D Zelda.
Last edited:
Connificent
Al Pachinko, Konami President
Then put on 480p glasses.
Captain Toad
Banned
Did you get your prescription changed between then and now? Because I don't ever remember thinking this looked good.
Serouj2000
Member
Price cut measures.
The same s*** they did with the SNES in 1990
ThatOneGrunt
Member
At the time, I remember it looking perfectly fine. Never had a problem with the visuals.
But I had component cables for my wii. Soooooo......
Captain Toad
Banned
Fair enough. It's just the previous generation had both Windwaker and Twilight Princess.
Marvel14
Banned
Post that best summarises the topic.
Without the washed out watercolour look, the game's warts and limitations are out in force in high resolution HD...less tempted to double dip now, even at $40
Last edited:
mcjmetroid
Member
Embarrassing
martino
Member
IbizaPocholo
NeoGAFs Kent Brockman
Kamina
Golden Boy
if Resetera spoils your games you should really take a break from the internet
Last edited: