X86 at 4th stage cancer, at least an arm is not life threatening.It will cost an arm and a leg.
X86 at 4th stage cancer, at least an arm is not life threatening.It will cost an arm and a leg.
1. And yet, they haven't.
2. Which is what dominates the computer market in terms of sales, by and large...which is why we're seeing this push for Arm.
Wake me up when this stuff enters the gaming desktop world.
In that case....
Apple is that "stupid", like Sony?Even if I'm loaded with money I'm not giving you 500 dollars for 1TB ssd that can be had for 80 dollars just because you decided to solder it to the board
I knew this thread would end up full of Apple fanboy sales pitches..
Don't get me wrong, with over a decade long run as an Apple fanboy (computers, pad, phones..) myself I know how hard it is to come back to real life.
With that said, one thing that kept me on Macs even after coming to my senses again is the fact that they have superior track pads. No joke, they're so good.
/Spinning beach ball
Anyway, there's nothing much to gain for consumers from the main topic of this thread, this is an industry's fight, let's see what happens. I doubt there will be much tangible change to feel from the outside.
Mac is for dummies who are loaded with money. Windows is for masses.
I've been waiting for the Surface Pro 10. I hope it will be worth the purchase.
Same. I’ve got an aging pro 7 that is in need of replacement. It’s the i5 model which I believe was the last fanless design, so hopefully the the Qualcomm pro 10 doesn’t require active cooling
I have the Surface Go 2. Using it since 2021... i love it, but its fucking horribly slow and dying for a major upgrade lol
Mac is cleaner, easier to use for day to day tasks and more secure than Windows. The only things Windows is good for (until SteamOS becomes prime time and supports other launchers) is gaming.
wtf is Intel Qualcomm adreno lol
x86 will continue to be the main draw for years, especially as Intel's moving to smaller process nodes and should be more power efficient eventually.
You could get a 15” MacBook with 16GB of RAM and 512GB SSD and would be more than sufficient for the sort of work you do. It’s about $1,500 which is going to be similar to good quality laptops from Dell, HP, Lenovo, or Samsung.Man, they sure are. I'm the opposite of a power user. I do basic office and browser tasks ("manager").
My Surface Laptop 2 died a couple of years ago and the IT team happened to have a 13" MacBook on hand that no one was using. It was the first generation that had that giant touchpad. I put up with it for a week while they got me another Surface, and oh my god that trackpad was amazing. I hated the keyboard and the tiny screen, so I didn't hesitate to trade it back for the Surface, but every time I use a trackpad on a laptop, I think back to that MacBook and how amazing that felt.
I wish I could get an ultrabook that has a 3:2 OLED screen and that touchpad. I'm sure someone makes one by now, but I can't justify to work why I would need one.
Ah, there it is. I was waiting for the "process node will solve Intel's woes" argument.
Good thing that wasn’t the argument I set out to make, eh?
Next week: Bill Gates will announce himself, that the Office assistants, like Clippy will be back in all currently running Windows versions. They will be smarter than ever, now with Prometheus AI. They cannot be turned off, listen to everything you say, transcribe it and gonna chime in whenever they think have something to say. Every once in a while BG himself will call you on Microsoft Teams and will talk with you for 5 minutes about saving the world.
Nope. It doesn't.correct, everything works like that
Apple's iGPU's are steadily growing in power but Apple insists you use their Metal API instead of something like OpenGL/Vulkan and no one has really put effort into emulating Direct3D on Mac yet the way they have on the Linux side with Proton. Until you can reliably execute API's commonly used in gaming you aren't going to see a lot of games for Mac anytime soon if everFunny how nobody talks about Apple's iGPUs, which are also important for customer feel, and which are also incredibly powerful considering their power envelope.
All of Apples lead is from being firstx86 vs ARM, or more broadly CISC vs RISC is all rather academic and a bit silly.
The only real difference is that x86 licensing is a mess.
Most of Apple's lead is from:
a) integration all into one SoC (so no separate RAM, GPU, etc.; therefore zero chance of upgradability)
b) Using the latest fabrication node, often buying up the entire lot, meaning no one else can use it.
b) Using the latest fabrication node, often buying up the entire lot, meaning no one else can use it.
All of Apples lead is from being first
Funny how nobody talks about Apple's iGPUs, which are also important for customer feel, and which are also incredibly powerful considering their power envelope.
Oh, how I can't wait until the playing field is somewhat more level so I can watch this argument just get exposed for the nonsense it is.
Until you can reliably execute API's commonly used in gaming you aren't going to see a lot of games for Mac anytime soon if ever
Well of course they are doing fantastic work but my comment is if they are the only ones doing serious Arm chips of course they have the lead. I have a 16" Mac Pro and. iPad Pro 12.9 with the m2. Iphone 15 pro, Apple Watch Ultra so I'm no hater.Uh huh...I'm sure there's nothing special AT ALL about their chip designs whatsoever. I'm sure Pat Gelsinger and crew are really going to bring the house down in the next couple of years; all of their incompetence over the last decade has really just been a case of Ali/Foreman rope-a-doping, designed to lull Apple into a false sense of security.
Intel...truly the 4D chessmasters of our time.
On a recent morning at its headquarters in Redmond, Washington, Microsoft representatives set out new Surface devices equipped with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite chips inside and compared them directly to Apple’s category-leading laptop. I witnessed an hour of demos and benchmarks that started with Geekbench and Cinebench comparisons, then moved on to apps and compatibility.
Benchmark tests usually aren’t that exciting to watch. But a lot was at stake here: for years, the MacBook Air has been able to smoke Arm-powered PC chips — and Intel-based ones, too. Except, this time around, the Surface pulled ahead on the first test. Then it won another test and another after that. The results of these tests are why Microsoft believes it’s now in position to conquer the laptop market.
Over the past two years, Microsoft has worked in secret with all of its top laptop partners to ready a selection of Arm-powered Windows machines that will hit the market this summer. Known as Copilot Plus PCs, they’re meant to kick-start a generation of powerful, battery-efficient Windows laptops and lay the groundwork for an AI-powered future.
“You’re going to have the most powerful PC ever,” says Yusuf Mehdi, executive vice president and consumer chief marketing officer at Microsoft, during the briefing. “In fact, it’s going to outperform any device out there, including a MacBook Air with an M3 processor, by over 50 percent on sustained performance.”
Windows laptops have fallen far behind MacBooks in performance and battery life ever since Apple’s transition to its own chips with the M1 launch in 2020. That makes Microsoft’s confidence levels here surprising, particularly given its rocky efforts with Windows on Arm over the past decade. Microsoft first attempted to transition Windows to Arm chips with the Surface RT in 2012, but performance was terrible and app compatibility was virtually nonexistent. The launch of the Surface Pro X in 2019 was a lot better thanks to improved emulation and underlying Windows changes. It wasn’t enough to match Apple’s M1 launch months later, but it was a sign of things to come, with the start of a close Qualcomm partnership that now looks like it might finally pay off.
“It’s something we haven’t had in over two decades, we’ve not had the high ground on having the most performant device. We’re going to have that,” says Mehdi.
I won’t be fully convinced until I’ve spent enough time with one of these new Copilot Plus PCs, but everything Microsoft showed me around performance and battery life looks lightyears ahead of the Arm-powered Windows laptops that existed before today.
One of the big advancements is an improved emulator called Prism, which Microsoft claims is as efficient as Apple’s Rosetta 2 translation layer and can emulate apps twice as fast as the previous generation of Windows on Arm devices.
“We spent a ton of energy here. For apps that are not yet native, we’re now able to take advantage of Prism’s capabilities and solve this with the better energy, platform, and performance efficiency of the emulator,” says Windows and Surface chief Pavan Davuluri.
That should result in efficiency gains over the previous emulator, but Microsoft is being vague with its promises here, so I’m not expecting huge leaps. Emulation only goes so far anyway. Apple’s success with the M1 was thanks to developers quickly porting apps to be fully native. Windows needs that same level of support from its developer community.
Fortunately for Microsoft, two major shifts have happened in recent years. First, many of the biggest apps now natively support Arm chips: Photoshop, Dropbox, Zoom, Spotify, and top entertainment apps like Prime and Hulu are all native ARM64 apps now. Second, Google and many other browser makers are moving to ARM64. A native version of Chrome launched recently, followed by Opera just last week. Firefox, Vivaldi, Brave, and Microsoft Edge are all also ARM64 native, so you won’t lose performance in any browser. That’s a big deal when you consider a lot of apps are web-based now and that we spend more time than ever inside a browser.
All of this app compatibility and performance is nothing without battery life, though. Microsoft uses a script to simulate web browsing. On 2022’s Intel-based Surface Laptop 5, it took eight hours, 38 minutes to completely deplete a battery; the new Surface Copilot Plus PC lasted three times that, hitting 16 hours, 56 minutes. That’s an incredible jump in efficiency, and it even beats the same test on a 15-inch MacBook Air M3, which lasted 15 hours, 25 minutes. That’s a whole hour and a half more.
Microsoft ran a similar test for video playback, which saw the Surface Copilot Plus PC hit more than 20 hours in a test, with the MacBook Air M3 reaching 17 hours, 45 minutes. That’s also nearly eight hours more than the Surface Laptop 5, which lasted 12 hours, 30 minutes. If those battery gains extend beyond basic web browsing and video playback, this will be a significant improvement for Windows laptops.
Also that Recall and Copilot+ shit is fucking creepy, MS thinks people actually want an AI watching everything they do on their computer 24/7?
Microsoft's problem has long been they fixate on competitors instead of making their products something people want to use independently of whatever competition that is used as the metric
Mac users aren't going to notice Windows because of some battery life benchmark, it's as dumb as thinking iPhone users will switch to Android because some Android phones have better battery life than iPhones
If I liked Windows, I would use Windows. I already am forced to use Windows to be a PC gamer and I genuinely prefer to use my MacBook Pro when I'm not playing games and I'm not sure how giving a Windows machine longer battery life will suddenly make me start liking Windows
Also that Recall and Copilot+ shit is fucking creepy, MS thinks people actually want an AI watching everything they do on their computer 24/7?
I'd hold the laughter until we see some true comparisons from trusted sites. Tom Warren posted his most recent newsletter and the performance claims look pretty fucking good. If Microsoft is outright lying here, Apple will throw it in their face and it'll all be over.
So it can't be all lies, can it?
Nailed it.
Instead of answering the question and stating why people should be looking at their product and what it's benefits are the main buzzword once again is "competition" x100:
It doesn't have to be "windows vs mac", there's an opportunity for them to carve out their own niche here, the market is green enough for them to be able to do so (combined with their resources). But instead, once again it's this focus on attempting to take someone else down.
War is all they know.
It could all be true but that doesn't mean folks need to start dancing on Apple's grave. It's just Jez being Jez.
Edit: To be clear, I was laughing at Jez, not the news reported from the event today. I agree with you that it all looks really good.