are there any other must have Feld games?
Luna and Bora Bora
are there any other must have Feld games?
Oh, well if they all contain good cards for some deck then I'll get all of them. Just wanted to quickly check there weren't any bad eggs.
They're all such a blur to me. Get the one with Kati Jones and whatever 3/2 agenda goes with your faction at minimum.
Wow Kati Jones is like Magnum Opus for everybody.
Maybe Netrunner needs its own thread? 100 % of the posts about Netrunner is 100 % incomprehensible
Maybe Netrunner needs its own thread? 100 % of the posts about Netrunner is 100 % incomprehensible
I find it interesting that every new post about Netrunner has a word I've never seen before in my life. The jargon is the number one reason why I don't play.
There are only about 30 terms you need to know! http://boardgamegeek.com/blogpost/20340/the-jargon-of-netrunner
But seriously you don't really need to know any of it. It's not Magic level of deckbuilding complexity and metagaming at all. It's much more focused on actual tactical in-game performance.
asymmetrical play always leads to imbalances
This isn't true for lots of games.
I think I'd probably like it, but don't have the time to get a PhD in Netrunner just to play a game.I find it interesting that every new post about Netrunner has a word I've never seen before in my life. The jargon is the number one reason why I don't play.
Examples of lots of these games? Usually it is done to appease folks because of scenario based games especially that can force a person into a situation that is not ideal or balanced. The idea often feels implemented to keep both sides happy by having exact same chances.
War of the Ring
Kemet
BSG (admittedly after a learning curve)
Middle Earth Quest
Chaos in the Old World
Fortress America
Rex/Dune
That's just a sampling from games I own.
I think I'd probably like it, but don't have the time to get a PhD in Netrunner just to play a game.
Netrunner is definitely an LCG that more "traditional" gamers have gravitated toward more so than probably any other CCG/LCG in large part I think because it is fairly simple in terms of core gameplay and also because of the fact that even doing decently at tournaments does not require you to be a deckbuilding wizard like Magic does (not saying this as a knock btw -- many would consider the infinitely greater depth of deckbuilding in Magic to be a pro not a con).
You guys play any Netrunner?
I'm thinking about picking up the starter, but I was wondering if it was one of those "you need to buy two cores to make a good deck" like the GoT card game.
The guys over on SUSD plugged my web series! Unfortunately, they had a few fans who really hated it, but that's to be expected I suppose.
The guys over on SUSD plugged my web series! Unfortunately, they had a few fans who really hated it, but that's to be expected I suppose.
In other news, all the talk of Eldritch Horror in this thread, made the wife and I finally bust out Arkham again... not only did we lose, but it felt like maybe we were playing wrong, but I couldn't put my finger on what the deal was. We got ROLLED. It was brutal.
I like the game okay, but I'm strongly considering trading it or selling it, in order to get something we'll play more.
You guys play any Netrunner?
I'm thinking about picking up the starter, but I was wondering if it was one of those "you need to buy two cores to make a good deck" like the GoT card game.
Totally understandable. It's weird territory.I didn't hate it but I also didn't love it. I thought the girlfriend at the start was the funniest one. Unfortunately I'm not sure how much she is going to be in it.
Are you one of the actors? It can only get better. That's a good thing.
I hope I get to demo Eldritch Horror at GenCon, but I'm not holding out much hope for that happening.
Totally understandable. It's weird territory.
Yeah, writer, director, sound guy, actor, composer, lol.
We unfortunately, for scheduling and money reasons, we can't use our actor friends for major parts, but luckily web series typically have pretty bad acting
I'm Donald BTW.
Ash is in every episode of the main show, she lives in LA, so her availability for sketches is pretty limited. She's the only one of us who can act, and we'd use her to death if we could
Totally understandable. It's weird territory.
Yeah, writer, director, sound guy, actor, composer, lol.
We unfortunately, for scheduling and money reasons, we can't use our actor friends for major parts, but luckily web series typically have pretty bad acting
I'm Donald BTW.
Ash is in every episode of the main show, she lives in LA, so her availability for sketches is pretty limited. She's the only one of us who can act, and we'd use her to death if we could
Don't see any of those as asymmetrical in the way Affeinvasion is talking about. Think he means more in line with the likes of Memoir and Space Hulk which tell you to play out a game, and then switch sides assuming same roles.
So if I had to pick between Rialto and In the Year of the Dragon, which one would play better with two players?
I like the theme of Dragon a lot more, to be honest.
I like Macao quite a bit. Granted, I've only played it 5 or 6 times, but it's been pretty fun every time. I like the suspense wondering if I'm going to get the right die rolls to pay for my cards, and the payoff when it works out.C) any other Feld. Except Macao.
C) any other Feld. Except Macao.
You are the first person in history to ever describe Macao as 'fun'. That game is all about kicking you in your balls while they're in a damn vice grip.
I've never once received a punishment token. Some of the other people I've played with have though. That being said, I think my record is 1/5, so I'm obviously not good.You are the first person in history to ever describe Macao as 'fun'. That game is all about kicking you in your balls while they're in a damn vice grip.
I don't only play Feld games. On Friday, we played Principato (like it a lot), Quarriors (weak sauce), and 7 Wonders (it's okay). Last week was Rialto (Feld) and Dominant Species (really dug this one too).Affeinvasion said:Shaggy clearly only plays Feld games so he doesn't have anything good to compare it to.Oh, snap!
I've never once received a punishment token. Some of the other people I've played with have though. That being said, I think my record is 1/5, so I'm obviously not good.
Of course, I rarely win at any game I play. Even less when it's something that I own.
I don't only play Feld games. On Friday, we played Principato (like it a lot), Quarriors (weak sauce), and 7 Wonders (it's okay). Last week was Rialto (Feld) and Dominant Species (really dug this one too).
Well if you think you'd like it...it's not hard at all to learn. Unless you mean you want to be a top-level tournament player. The game takes maybe 30m to learn, 60m if you want to know literally all the rules corner cases that will probably never come up for you (99% of which are documented in the FAQ).
When you see all the lingo and deckbuilding discussion, what you're seeing is people who just enjoy the tournament and meta aspect of the game, but it's very far from a requirement (otherwise it wouldn't be 10% as popular as it is on BGG).
Netrunner is definitely an LCG that more "traditional" gamers have gravitated toward more so than probably any other CCG/LCG in large part I think because it is fairly simple in terms of core gameplay and also because of the fact that even doing decently at tournaments does not require you to be a deckbuilding wizard like Magic does (not saying this as a knock btw -- many would consider the infinitely greater depth of deckbuilding in Magic to be a pro not a con).
Actually, this was the first time I've played it with more than two. The dummy 2-player variant doesn't work too bad. It changes up the strategy a bit, and actually works rather well.Please don't tell me you played 7 Wonders with two people...
I hate the 2 player variant. It's a completely different game at that point and that game sucks.Actually, this was the first time I've played it with more than two. The dummy 2-player variant doesn't work too bad. It changes up the strategy a bit, and actually works rather well.
To each their own, I guess. It does change the strategy of the game drastically, but I don't think it makes it a bad game. I'm not a huge fan of the game anyways, and the three player game we played didn't sway me in either direction.I hate the 2 player variant. It's a completely different game at that point and that game sucks.
Just got in a game of Bioshock Infinite: Siege of Columbia. Really sold area control game. The mechanic of using your action cards in three different ways (influence, combat, money) is very good and leads to some interesting decisions. The combat itself is very simple but it works. It's also pretty friendly as you will only ever lose 1 unit in combat if you lose, unless you really screw up and don't have any strongholds to retreat to then you lose them all. Booker was always a threat but ended up being a non-issue as he only really attacked once at it was late game so we re fairly well equipped to take him.
I ended up winning pretty handily, but since most of my points were on the board that could have changed at any time. I will say that the end of the game was anti-climactic. I ended up taking an area to grab me a territory point and I was able to claim a goal card that stated I owned four territories. It was also during a turn where we had an f-ton of cards so my friend was gearing up to take some territories back. Oh we'll, still a fun game and my friend and I already made plans to play it again later this week.
They are here!
http://abload.de/img/photo1ddqsw.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
[quote="Apenheul, post: 76151519"][img]https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-MoZw4xpTm5Q/Ugox8upUlbI/AAAAAAAABtc/Goh13RGuZbo/w1345-h1009-no/doom.jpg[img]
I just couldn't resist for 40 euros, will buy Descent 2nd edition too some time this year.[/QUOTE]
Nice!
Nice!
Masquerades is on my short list.
Reddit is saying Firefly will be on sale so I will be running to Gale Force Nine's booth first thing Thursday for two copies. Cross your fingers Joey!