Mashing said:I played a base game of Shadows over Camelot, but I didn't quite like it. I like the art and the theme, but, I don't know i can't put my finger on it. I didn't like it much. Maybe it was because we only had 4 players (or because it was the first time I've played it), but it didn't click with me. The simplicity actually turned me off I think and I didn't see much strategy being employed. We had 1 traitor, who was discovered. I'll probably give it another shot though.
Shadows over Camelot is a pretty simple game and seems to work best when everyone knows what is going on. In teaching games you normally run into the problem where the experienced player has to coach people into what to do. Which makes it hard for the traitor to do much damage since everyone is being told what to do. When everyone knows the rules well you kind of each do your own thing which makes the traitors job easier.
Also, traitors seem to be pretty bad at hiding it in the first few games.. they try and do obvious bad things.
It is certainly a game whose mechanics are not all that great, they are really basic. But the overall feel of the game is a good deal of fun.
It's an enjoyable game, but Battlestar is a much better game and allows the traitor to do "bad" things much more often without anyone knowing since it is a blind voting process.
Mashing said:Some old Rio Grande railroad game (I can't remember the name of it, it has a lot to do with stocks)--another fun game
http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/31730/chicago-express
Sounds like Chicago Express. I've only played it once but had fun with it.