I was watching Inside the NFL and I liked the fact that some of the Steelers fans immediately started chanting E-A-G-L-E-S to shut up some evil homo Pats fan who was talking some smack at the end of the game.
I'm starting to think the phenomenon of parity is an excuse for some teams to hide behind it and justify why they don't succeed like our two Super Bowl contenders. New England and Philadelphia are the two best teams in the NFL after the single-elimination tournament that sends them to Jacksonville to decide the championship. But they were the best organizations over the past four years even before the playoff victories. Since 2001, the Patriots are 56-16 and the Eagles are 55-19. That is not parity for the rest of the NFL.
TheDuce22 said:I was surprised by that too. Most steelers fans I know talked crap about the eagles all year. Pat Kirwan is my new hero, I have been saying this for years.
http://www.superbowl.com/news/story/8138233
Muhammad a hot Senior Bowl topic
With coaches, front-office workers, agents and scouts out in force, the Senior Bowl is a great rumor mill. One rumor involved Panthers receiver Muhsin Muhammad. The word is, Muhammad's agent, Joel Segal, gave the team a ballpark figure on what it will take to keep his client.
Muhammad remains under contract for 2005. But he's scheduled to have a $12.5 million salary-cap figure and to receive a $10 million roster bonus by March 2. Those numbers mean the Panthers either have to release Muhammad or sign him to a cap-friendly extension.
Segal spoke with the Panthers several times this week, and the sides are expected to continue talking. Segal and the Panthers don't comment on specifics of negotiations, but the buzz at the afternoon practice was that Segal told the Panthers it would take a five-year deal for about $35 million in total value, with a signing bonus of about $10 million, to keep Muhammad.
FrenchMovieTheme said:i bet you some A-hole got paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for creating the new logo :lol
levious said:The Rams going from last to first fostered the parity hype... really don't see it myself any different from the past 20 years while I've been a fan.
skinnyrattler said:And when you compare it to baseball and the Yankees continual playoff runs, parity looks a lot better than any other setup. Atlanta, San Diego and Steeler fans can attest to parity being a great thing. It kills to have a team slowly progress towards a championship. Now, everybody is just a season or two away from 'possibly' making it to the Super Bowl. Imagine how much life would fuckin suck if the Cowboys had made the playoffs for the last 10 years. Dynasties are only fun to watch when it's your team. Ask Karl Malone and Charles Barkley if they like dynasties. One good player and one great player that never have one a championship because of a fuckin dynasty. And I'm just kidding, Karl Malone is great player. But personally, he's a fuckin douche.
skinnyrattler said:Atlanta, San Diego and Steeler fans can attest to parity being a great thing.
CHARLOTTE - It appears that Steve Smith is alive and well. That makes the Carolina Panthers very happy and, well, probably a little nervous, too. As Smith begins to feel better about recovering from the broken left leg that cost him all but three quarters and some change of last season, the mercurial receiver's mouth has been loosening up as well.
Say what you will about Smith, but he's pretty much always said and done whatever he wanted.
He doesn't worry about the consequences.
So it was last week that he openly ripped wide receiver Freddie Mitchell of the Philadelphia Eagles during an interview on Sporting News Radio.
"Freddie Mitchell has 22 catches (this season). He's not a premier receiver," Smith said. "My son in flag football had 22 catches. That's the level he's on."
Smith even took issue with the fact that Mitchell scored two touchdowns in the Eagles' second-round playoff win over Minnesota, one of which came when he recovered a teammate's fumble.
"Score with the ball. Don't catch somebody else's fumble.... Freddie Mitchell can't hold my jock," Smith said.
Warming up
Smith was just getting warmed up.
"Let's put my paycheck up with his paycheck. Let's put my touchdowns up with his touchdowns," he told the national-radio audience. "I got half of his receptions and I only played one game! And he got 22? Whoop-dee-do. He's an NFL player.
"You've got to be kidding me. He's a joke. All I have to say.... I was drafted in the third round. He was drafted in the first round. Hey, I'm not going to say it.... Bust.... Bust.... And I'm not talking about Jerome the Bus either. He's garbage and Steve Smith said it. If he's got a problem, he knows where to find me - North Carolina."
effzee said:wow smith got his panties in a bunch. anyone who takes mitchell seriously is seriously retarded...he is just a comedian and what the media is missing with TO gone for now.
we all know he is a bust considering where he was drafted but he stepped up in that minn game and he will go across the middle to make tough catches.....and with TO as our starter we dont need much and we dont ask much else of Freddie.
AstroLad said:Well Mitchell might have been joking, but Smith sure fucking wasn't. Ho-lee shit that's some trash talking. Doesn't mean much coming from someone whose team wasn't even in the playoffs against someone whose team is in the SB, though.
Ninja Scooter said:Smith's team WAS in the superbowl last year, and unlike Freddie, he actually contributed a lot to that appearance. Freddie Mitchell talking trash is akin to when Mike Vanderjagt opens his mouth.
Ramirez said:I wish there was a way both teams could lose
And :lol @Smith
Ramirez said:I wish there was a way both teams could lose
Spectral Glider said:I was starting to think of rooting for the Eagles, but then my gonad of a brother-in-law, who lives 20 minutes out of Philly and knows spit about football, had to open his mouth about the Steelers losing. So let's go Pats. I don't mind some trash talking from real fans, but when these fly by night people who watch only one game a year start talking crap, it ticks me off to no end. For instance, I never said a word to him after the Steelers pounded the snot out of the Eagles this year....and it's because I'm pretty sure he had no clue they were even playing that week.
bionic77 said:Dude what is it with fucking Eagles fans? They just can't keep their mouths shut. I grew up about an hour from Philly, so everyone I grew up is an Eagles fan and they just talk more trash then any other 3 fans combined. And as much as I hate the Pats, it seems like all their fans( that I know) acted in a classy manner after they raped the Steelers.
I was real close to punching a friend of mine in the mouth (an Eagles fan) who started talking trash about the Steelers after the AFC Championship.
I still want the Eagles to win because my hatred for Tom Brady knows no bounds, but really I am starting to hope that somehow there is some way for both of them to lose and be humiliated. I am sure there is some crazy rule in the NFL rulebook where both teams lose the SuperBowl and John Madden somehow walks home with the Lombardi trophy.
TheDuce22 said:Give me a break, Eagles fans have taken more crap over the past 4 years than you can imagine. Let us have our fun.
TheDuce22 said:Give me a break, Eagles fans have taken more crap over the past 4 years than you can imagine. Let us have our fun.
bionic77 said:Still, asshole fans or not, McNabb at least deserves to win the Superbowl once. He is too good not to. Even if the fans may not deserve it, he sure does.
4. Jake Delhomme, Super Bowl XXXVIII
By far the greatest performance in a losing effort, even more astonishing because with three minutes left in the first half, the Patriots had outgained the Panthers 125 yards to -7 and Delhomme had completed one pass for one yard. His clutch second half was good enough to win the game, but Carolina's special teams and defense could not hold at the end.
TheDuce22 said:I think south jersey is some kind of bizarre experiment in cloning gone wrong. I swear they almost all look and act exactly the same. Eagles fans are probably more in your face because we have had a very good team year after year. If cleveland had been to 4 straight afc championships you would be wishing for the days of shit talking philly fans.
border said:I'm in Jacksonville and this is obviously the first time we've hosted a Superbowl. Can anybody from previous host cities tell me.....exactly how much should I expect the town to shut down? Will I be okay if I just avoid downtown or will it bring traffic/service everywhere to a halt?
Incognito said:Calling a Patriots win by at least 17. The Iggles toughest competition faced this year was the Redskins, and we saw what a good defense can do against a not so good offense.
The Iggles toughest competition faced this year was the Redskins, and we saw what a good defense can do against a not so good offense.
Some of the most interesting shots of next Sunday's big Super Bowl game could come from a small camera.
A very small camera.
Fox Sports has planted so-called Turf Cams around Alltel Stadium in Jacksonville, Florida -- including four on the field where the New England Patriots and the Philadelphia Eagles will play Super Bowl XXXIX. Eight more of the Turf Cams aren't in the turf at all -- they'll be mounted at the end zones.
"They're so tiny, they're effectively the size of an eraser on a pencil," says David Hill, chairman of Fox Sports and a driving force behind his network's use of technology during sporting events.
For the Super Bowl, Fox got the NFL's approval. When the new turf was being placed onto the field after the Florida Panthers' last game, technicians laid devices about half the size of a cigar box and cable underneath the field. They'll place the eraser-sized cameras this week.
Two of the Turf Cams will be placed around each 20-yard line facing the end zone, and the other two at the three-yard lines where snaps are done for extra points. The cameras will be placed at 45-degree angles prior to the game. Video will be fed to Fox's production truck and, if it's good, they'll put it on the air.
"We're hoping we get four, five, maybe six plays that we can take a shot, prior to snap, as to what it looks like looking up at these huge players," Brown says.
Fox says there's no chance that players could be hurt by landing on the cameras. But the same can't be said about the Turf Cams.
"There's definitely that concern," Brown says about the possibility of damage, although if a player steps on a Turf Cam there's a chance it will bounce back and remain usable. Plus, a football field is pretty big.
"We're hoping that the odds are with us that nobody will step on these four little-size cameras," Brown says.
Fox says there's no expectation about the Turf Cams, which might pick up action and it might not. Brown says it's about giving the viewers something different.
Hill says the whole thing's a gamble and figures there's a 100 to 1 chance of getting something useful.
"If you see something, it's great. If not, it's no big whup," he says.
Eminem said:SWEET. IT'LL BE JUST AS GREAT AS THE HOME PLATE CAMERA DURING THE MLB PLAY-OFFS LAST YEAR! THAT THING SURE WAS GREAT