Well I got an email from Adorama and the 5D3 preorder pricre is 3499.95. Fuck that shit!
I guess my future FF choice has come back to D700 only. How about somebody just make a FF body with a single AF point?
Is the price tempering everyone's excitement for this? Seeing the specs I expected everyone to be going crazy for it, but $3500 is a lot higher than the already high expected price.
Canon just came off a pretty bad year financially (like all Japanese electronics companies), so I guess they're just doing what they feel is in their best interest.
why not the 5Dmk2 though, honestly? its not like this body is obsolete, it is still a tremendous camera.
not sure why/how most of you guys are expecting a cheap FF camera...how does it profit the manufacturers at all...it will cannibalize their body sales.
There is a huge market for a cheap FF body that has almost no AF function and zero video feature. But either Nikon and Canon want to build and sell it for under 2000, becasue they know people who buy them won't buy many new AF lens.
From what I've seen (sample images) from the Lytro, I don't understand the hype. A lot of the examples showcase photos that are clearly missfocused and the Lytro allows you to bring the focus back. Not really good examples showcasing bad technique (if you need a whole system devoted to refocusing your photos). You literally have the wonderful choice of focusing on your human subject or focusing on a brick wall.
The interesting aspects of the system will be coming later (like having having absolutely everything in focus). But the system is odd in that it uses Lytro proprietary software to connect to Lytro servers so it can make these changes to the photos. Also the images are very low resolution (1080x1,080). The camera just seems half baked and I don't know why people are so excited about the camera in its current form.
Really dpreview. No one cares about jpegs.We've had a chance to prepare a set of full-resolution studio-based JPEG samples from a pre-production Canon EOS 5D Mark III,
Really dpreview. No one cares about jpegs.
Heh? Just take out the AF in 5D3 and stuff in the one in 600D. What R&D? Thats nonsense. Why wouldn't they be able to sell the body under 2K if Canon is already selling the 5D2 under 2K?right, but you've explained why they won't do it, they wont make money on the body, or lenses. and it might be cost prohibitive to design a FF body just for this market and sell it. it's not just the making cost. the production overhead: changing their plant assembly lines, R&D...these things add a lot of overhead. i'm not even sure they have the capability to sell this magic FF camera under 2 grand.
What's the problem?
The dial next to the shutter release I can understand, but the rear wheel and joystick are my favorite parts of the eos line! Speaking madness to me. So quick to switch my af points or review photos with them.The vertical sub dial for one. On a nikon I can use my middle finger and change stuff, the canon dial forces you to move your finger off the shutter. Then there are all the small buttons next to it, which have dual uses seemingly not related to each other at all!
The rear jog wheel is too low, and the little joystick nub is a pain to use.
IDK it's just a weird scheme to me. I am sure if I shoot it more I would get used to it/adapt but every time I pick up the 7D I just go uggg why??!?!
Heh? Just take out the AF in 5D3 and stuff in the one in 600D. What R&D? Thats nonsense. Why wouldn't they be able to sell the body under 2K if Canon is already selling the 5D2 under 2K?
In conclusion I have to say that Canon have addressed every issue that we had with the 5D Mark II and built a stunningly good camera. The more you handle it, the more you realise that there has been a lot of input from professional photographers into this camera, and if you are a photojournalist or anyone that shoots in that style, this is the perfect camera for you. Obviously it isn’t a speed demon like the 1DX and you have to watch the buffer when shooting dual cards with high ISO in high speed drive mode, but that is to be expected. The camera produces staggeringly good files at all ISO speeds, it focuses quickly and accurately, it is built like a small tank and is as quiet as a church mouse with a Leica if you want it to be. What else do you need from a camera?
1900: http://bestpricephoto.com/h/product...sv=gg&osCsid=8861162e402df9f18a4b097391c65ce75DII is said to be getting a price cut AND it's already sub-$2K.
Yea... don't get people bitching about wanting a cheap FF. It's here now. The 5DII is a monster, just because there's a shiny new version out doesn't change that.
edit: WAIT, it's not sub $2k now, but I'm assuming it will be with the cut.
5DII is said to be getting a price cut AND it's already sub-$2K.
Yea... don't get people bitching about wanting a cheap FF. It's here now. The 5DII is a monster, just because there's a shiny new version out doesn't change that.
edit: WAIT, it's not sub $2k now, but I'm assuming it will be with the cut.
What do you all use to clean your lenses?
so close to pulling the trigger on the mark III. always wanted the m2 but wanted to wait for the 3. dat price though and with the price of the m2 dropping I have no idea what to do.
so close to pulling the trigger on the mark III. always wanted the m2 but wanted to wait for the 3. dat price though and with the price of the m2 dropping I have no idea what to do.
Ever consider the 7D?
In regards to getting the best for the least amount of money (for a Full Frame body) I think the 5DMKII dropping below $2K would be a huge bang for the buck. As great as the 5DMKIII looks to be its got the bleeding edge premium going for it.
yea it's starting to sound like a great deal. any idea what it's going to drop to? saw the website above with the $1899 price tag but that site looks shady.
My Mother in Law is looking at DSLRs and wants a Nikon since she has a bunch of Nikon compatible lenses from her old 35 mm. My last two DSLRs are canon so I really know nothing about the Nikon lineup and where things fit in.
The camera store told her she needed at least the D90 to have full AF control over her older lenses. That one seems to be aging a bit at 4+ years old though.
To help me put this in a more familiar light so that I can help her, what are the Nikon range general equivs of between the t2i/t3i and the 60D?
Thanks!
Unfortunately if you want a Nikon that will autofocus with what I assume are AF-D lenses then it is either go for a D90 or a D7000, other options being a D300 for crop sensor as well.
The D90 is a great camera though even if it is old you should be able to find a used one for a good price. Otherwise I'd recommend the D7000. That what sucks about entry level Nikons you are forced to use AF-S and G type lenses if you want autofocus.
anyone have the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 lens? is this a good portrait lens? i have decided to upgrade to the 7D, and i'd like to have this in my arsenal, as a 135 equivalent.
anyone have the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 lens? is this a good portrait lens? i have decided to upgrade to the 7D, and i'd like to have this in my arsenal, as a 135 equivalent.
anyone have the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 lens? is this a good portrait lens? i have decided to upgrade to the 7D, and i'd like to have this in my arsenal, as a 135 equivalent.
If you don't already have a 50mm lens, might I recommend the EF 50mm f1.4 USM instead?
Probably my favorite lens after my 24-70mm. Fantastic image quality, super fast AF and really cheap. The build quality is also quite nice considering the price. Overall a way better deal than the 50mm1.4 (slower AF, lower image quality imo, build quality not as good, still a great lens though)anyone have the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 lens? is this a good portrait lens? i have decided to upgrade to the 7D, and i'd like to have this in my arsenal, as a 135 equivalent.
The Handheld Blog said:I must stress that these photos have been taken with a prototype device, which is around two months away from a final firmware. Since a lot of the magic happens in the software, the picture quality will only go up from here. Also, most of these shots were taken while I was walking around, with barely even a second spent on composing the shot.
If I had decided to mess around with the settings a little, and may be wiped a little grease off the lens (I have a suspicion there was some!) I'm sure the picture quality would have been even better.
What do you think?
The Handheld Blog said:
The Handheld Blog said:Yesterday I brought you some full resolution pictures from the Nokia 808′s 41 Megapixel camera, and those represented something of an extreme case. When Nokia made the 808, they didn't intend on people taking 38 MP photos. In fact the default automatic mode shoots at 5 Megapixels (3072 x 1728) and the image weighs in at about 1 MB, a stark contract from the full resolution (7728 x 4354) photo that can go upto 16 MB or more.
The benefit of shooting in this mode is the oversampling that helps reduce noise and increase color accuracy and sharpness. A 5MP photo from the 41 MP sensor means that each pixel in the 5MP image is the result of the aggregation of about 8 pixels. The result is similar to what you experience when you resize a large photo into a tiny one and it suddenly becomes nice and crisp...
[more pics]