But again, I don't see this whole "the Castle dragged on" thing. If you split RE4 into three areas, the Village, Castle, and Island, then yeah, the Castle is nearly half of the game, but that doesn't mean it "drags." Honestly, there's a good amount of variety between when you enter the Castle and when you leave for the Island.
I can see how the Castle overstays its welcome. Thinking back on it I can't remember its progression, just a muddled blur of monster rooms and monster corridors. At times it felt like a childhood car trip watching billboards go by and badgering Dad about when we'd arrive. Monk monk monk, "Are we there yet," monk monk monk, "Are we there yet," monk monk monk, "Are we there yet," monks with rocket launchers, "Are we there yet," aaaaaand we're there: Verdugo, USA. But diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks. Some'll love it, others will tire.
That being said, I love the Castle from an artistic standpoint, even if it's so silly by design. And it is VERY silly. I mean, off the top of my head, a giant wheeled platform that rides rails to reach a lava room with dragon statues? Think about it; who makes shit like that? It's laughable one would try to find plotholes in RE5 by citing a fallen soldier's map telling what to do in the marshlands, or Irving telling Chris and Sheva the caves lie up ahead (
both of which make sense), yet they accept with a straight face the path to RE4's lava room, or the carasoul in said lava room (wtf), or any of the other inexplicable details in the game. It's lovable nonsense, sure, but
nonsense nonetheless, and to say RE5 is somehow more nonsensical is, well, nonsense. But hey, blinding hatred does that to you.
Speaking of the two or three haters, I agree with Rash: What
do people hope to accomplish by bitching about a game? Especially to an audience of people that love the game and can't stop playing it, a game that's selling like hotcakes and against whose numbers the few dissenters can do little to change? It doesn't do the preservation of RE4's "glory" any favors to bicker petulantly about a sequel that in many ways is VERY similar to its predecessor, to the point where to insult RE5 is to insult RE4 as well, and that in other ways can just as easily be argued as better as worse, as has been proven by the dissertations for and against the game over the past few pages. And really, while I understand the merits of voicing criticisms, I don't see the merit in repeating them over and over and over again, especially when some are so petty as to be inane, and one's life could be better spent playing what one
likes rather than self-pitying what one
hates. And if you can't play what you want at the moment: we get it. You don't like the game.
Like Rez said: GAF's airing its reruns. And it's not the funny GIF variety.