If you're not interested in a cinematic third-person shooter, then this game is probably not for you. With an average playing time of eight to ten hours, this is a game that only fans of the cinematic approach will appreciate. The story is a double edged sword. The way they tell it is impressive, but the story itself has a lot of inconsistencies and is only really good as a foundation for a potential sequel. The gameplay is standard third-person shooter stuff with a noticeable lack of challenge and a few minor faults like a disappointing melee system and a few animations (such as rolling) you can only use when the game wants you to. In terms of presentation, is is a clear winner. Far above all other games. It is an aspect that rightly deserves praise and hopefully it will encourage other developers to reach a similar level of detail. It makes the future of this generation look promising. As a whole, The Order 1886 is definitely worth playing and it turns out to be a nice introduction to a franchise we hope will have a bright future ahead of it. However, this game is not without its faults and we simple cannot deny the fact this game has less content than similar IPs in the genre. It is obvious this game has paid a heavy price to reach the immensely high production values. It is up to the player to decide whether it was worth it.
+ Graphics are CGI-quality
+ Strong design & presentation
+ Satisfying gunplay
- Inconsistent story
- Short, little replayability
- Lack of challenge
- Minor faults here and there
Final score: 75%
Exactly, in the last of us you feel it, even though in the order limbs fly off if you use the more powerful version of the second it just doesn't feel as punchy, and the melee (if you can call it that) just isn't as good because they made a canned animation instead of a flying punch straight to the jaw.
A game that does canned animation really well is MGSV.I personally don't think there's anything inherently inferior with canned animation vs a direct melee attack, but The Order doesn't sell the illusion of being 'as involved' with the melee sequences as well as TLoU, partially in due to how the camera cuts away, and how the button prompts make it feel like you're activating something instead of hitting someone.
If it were me, I would had removed the prompts and made the 'activation' of every melee start from gameplay camera, so that at least it felt like you were pressing a button to attack someone in-game.
I had no issues with the accuracy particularly. In retrospect i'd just attribute the lack of punch to the way the enemies react instead of the way the actual weapons shoot.Outside of a few weapons (pistols namely), I very much disagree with you on the weapons lacking punch. I actually feel they're really punchy, they just have a crap tonne of recoil and are not that stable or accurate (as would be expected of the time period).
Game on a 21:9 monitor.
All of this is just my opinion, of course.
So... am I wrong for saying some people ITT seem to have an opinion similar to my review, in the end? For reference, this was my score/consensus:
Review link (rough translation): https://translate.google.com/transl....be/reviews/43162/1/The-Order-1886&edit-text=
I was and am still shocked that we got scores as low as 4/10 and 2,5/10. Disregarding the gameplay and the filmic approach, the production values and presentation are just so good that I can't believe someone would give it a 4/10. Even if you don't like the story and think the gameplay is a tad too traditional. I've seen games get 4/10 which are literal shit. Compared to those games, The Order 1886 is a straight 10/10 classic.
All of this is just my opinion, of course.
A game that does canned animation really well is MGSV.
Always bet on Dawg.
All of that is just my opinion, of course.
ADD folks? DamnI'm on chapter 2. It's definitely a slow burn to start but I'm intrigued. I can see why ADD folks wouldn't like this but I'm hooked so far. The atmosphere is amazing.
Your opinions all make me interested at someday picking this game up but I feel like literally every single thread about a game that receives middling scores talks about how this game is actually great. The Knack thread for example. I would love to try this game and see for myself, but spending 65$ on a game that I may not like is a tall ask.
I went to the store to try to buy it after work and unfortunately they were sold out
So... am I wrong for saying some people ITT seem to have an opinion similar to my review, in the end? For reference, this was my score/consensus:
Review link (rough translation): https://translate.google.com/transl....be/reviews/43162/1/The-Order-1886&edit-text=
I was and am still shocked that we got scores as low as 4/10 and 2,5/10. Disregarding the gameplay and the filmic approach, the production values and presentation are just so good that I can't believe someone would give it a 4/10. Even if you don't like the story and think the gameplay is a tad too traditional. I've seen games get 4/10 which are literal shit. Compared to those games, The Order 1886 is a straight 10/10 classic.
All of this is just my opinion, of course.
Your opinions all make me interested at someday picking this game up but I feel like literally every single thread about a game that receives middling scores talks about how this game is actually great. The Knack thread for example. I would love to try this game and see for myself, but spending 65$ on a game that I may not like is a tall ask.
If the review system wasn't fucked up, everybody would accept quickly that a 65 on Metacritic is slightly above average, a flawed game, but decent. People were expecting more because graphics and Sony exclusive, but in the end we are brainwashed that anything below 90 is questionable, when that includes some of the best games ever made.Would you look at that. People actually judging the game for what it is and not for what it isn't. Good job.
I went to the store to try to buy it after work and unfortunately they were sold out
So... am I wrong for saying some people ITT seem to have an opinion similar to my review, in the end? For reference, this was my score/consensus:
Review link (rough translation): https://translate.google.com/transl....be/reviews/43162/1/The-Order-1886&edit-text=
I was and am still shocked that we got scores as low as 4/10 and 2,5/10. Disregarding the gameplay and the filmic approach, the production values and presentation are just so good that I can't believe someone would give it a 4/10. Even if you don't like the story and think the gameplay is a tad too traditional. I've seen games get 4/10 which are literal shit. Compared to those games, The Order 1886 is a straight 10/10 classic.
All of this is just my opinion, of course.
If the review system wasn't fucked up, everybody would accept quickly that a 65 on Metacritic is slightly above average, a flawed game, but decent. People were expecting more because graphics and Sony exclusive, but in the end we are brainwashed that anything below 90 is questionable, when that includes some of the best games ever made.
So... am I wrong for saying some people ITT seem to have an opinion similar to my review, in the end? For reference, this was my score/consensus:
I was and am still shocked that we got scores as low as 4/10 and 2,5/10. Disregarding the gameplay and the filmic approach, the production values and presentation are just so good that I can't believe someone would give it a 4/10. Even if you don't like the story and think the gameplay is a tad too traditional. I've seen games get 4/10 which are literal shit. Compared to those games, The Order 1886 is a straight 10/10 classic.
All of this is just my opinion, of course.
5 hours in, feel like giving up. Looks stunning yes but the writing is just so bad and the gameplay is incredibly mundane.
The writing is bad by what standard?
I get early 2000 vibes:Also what year of CGI would you guys compare this game too? Because obviously it's comparable on some level to CG.
Yeah, I think critics were uncharacteristicly harsh on this game, and I have no idea why. I just finished it and while it's a flawed game, I think it's a really good game despite those flaws. I really hope those exaggerated reviews don't prevent us from getting a sequel, because I really want to see where RAD will take it from here.So... am I wrong for saying some people ITT seem to have an opinion similar to my review, in the end? For reference, this was my score/consensus:
Review link (rough translation): https://translate.google.com/transl....be/reviews/43162/1/The-Order-1886&edit-text=
I was and am still shocked that we got scores as low as 4/10 and 2,5/10. Disregarding the gameplay and the filmic approach, the production values and presentation are just so good that I can't believe someone would give it a 4/10. Even if you don't like the story and think the gameplay is a tad too traditional. I've seen games get 4/10 which are literal shit. Compared to those games, The Order 1886 is a straight 10/10 classic.
All of this is just my opinion, of course.
Also what year of CGI would you guys compare this game too? Because obviously it's comparable on some level to CG.
The Last of Us set the high bar, not the medium bar. The writing in The Order is average, at worst.Compared to many other single player only, story driven games.
5 hours in, feel like giving up. Looks stunning yes but the writing is just so bad and the gameplay is incredibly mundane.
Holy fucking shit the graphics. I have never seen a game that looks anywhere near as good and I have a beast of a gaming pc.
I am going to have to do a second playthrough just to take screenshots.