4.3 user? the way things are going, it could be as low as 1.0
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Order 1886 Review Thread
- Thread starter The Sarcastic Dude
- Start date
- Status
4.3 user? the way things are going, it could be as low as 1.0
BlackBuzzard
Banned
That thread got purged im almost certain. Then spun off in to its own thread.
BlazingDarkness
Member
I expect lots of 6/10s.
Mass_Pincup
Banned
I think it's going to get a 78 MC.
According to this 'judge a game based on what it is, not what its not' mantra I hear repeated often enough, every game is a 10/10, perfect, best ever of its kind. "But this other game did this and that better" "Ah ah ah, this isn't *that* game is it? Stop judging it based on what other games have done and only judge based on what *it* is trying to do." "Well what is it trying to do then?" "Exactly what it does."
He said "non reputable" not "totally awesome".
I'd expect much lower from Giant Bomb if their recent "It's not worth $40 for the amount of gameplay you get" statements are anything to go by.
Even from preliminary hands-on impressions, the game should score poorly from them since they seem to pay attention to that facet more.
What is a reputable website in this context?
There are no qualifications to be a game reviewer. Why would some reviews count more than others?
For those wondering when the embargo lifts:
So many fingers ready to click right now...
1st Course
Member
It's an exclusive. These always draws the most attention (see: Driveclub, Titanfall, Uncharted 3 etc review threads)
He is one of their main reviewers though. The guy actually likes the game and gave it a 6.5. Yikes
I expect a 7.5 from IGN
Reputable means having a good reputation.
You can be a reviewer without any kind of reputation.
but is he on Metacritic
Quality of writing, dedication to facts, respecting standard journalistic conventions, having an easy to navigate website design.
AHA-Lambda
Member
I guess 76 MC score.
Give War A Chance
Member
StoppedInTracks
Member
10 mins left.
Brace yourself for impact, Sony-gaf.
Brace yourself for impact, Sony-gaf.
lol
EventHorizon
Member
So your review would have no relation to how much the public would enjoy it, but only rare a game based on how well it fulfilled the developer's vision. Who would that review be good for?
Hey that's the same reason there's no DLC.
NoMoreTrolls
Banned
Embargoes are fairly common. Post release embargoes are not
Mass_Pincup
Banned
First big exclusive new IP for the PS4 so fanboy from everywhere are here to either wish for the game to have bad review or good, it's going to be a fun thread!
Imagine if movie reviews were done similarly to game reviews.
Cameras were always rolling, everyone was well lit, and makeup applied. Nothing fell in front of the camera during filming.
10/10
Deep impact?
Indeed.
Justice_Bolt
Member
Please be good.. At least a 7 or 7.5/10 game.
CassidyIzABeast
Member
Main sticking points will be:
pacing
amount of content/replayability
how basic the combat is
story related issues
pacing
amount of content/replayability
how basic the combat is
story related issues
NyMartin90
Member
Whatever it is I hope this game succeeds, I wish RaD the best. That way we can get a sequel and improve on this new ip series for the better.
I recognized Téa Leoni's head.
marcincz
Member
- Status