Hobbygaming
has been asked to post in 'Grounded' mode.
From the words of the insider Shinobi, The Order 1886 was profitable
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Order: 1886 sequel could be headed to PS5 and Xbox Series X, if these leaked teases are right
- Thread starter GamerEDM
- Start date
Hobbygaming
has been asked to post in 'Grounded' mode.
Agreed. The Order 1886 still looks jaw dropping till this day
DynamiteCop!
Banned
Meh, you can see its age for sure, and it's still pretty blurry.
ElCasual
Member
This
ethomaz
Banned
Master of spins kkkkkkkk
You never learn.
I thought you were avoiding me with your lies.
Last edited:
Hobbygaming
has been asked to post in 'Grounded' mode.
I played it about 3-4 weeks ago and it's still the best looking and most consistent. The materials from the high quality PBR are unmatched
DynamiteCop!
Banned
It has nothing to do with spin, you don't use any logic.
I asked you how you know that RAD doesn't currently own the IP and you post an article from 5 years ago that says "at the time it wasn't possible" in relation to them retaining ownership to which I say "A lot can change in 5 years", and somehow I'm spinning something?
You rarely make a lick of sense, jesus.
ethomaz
Banned
Logic? C’mon spinner.
The guy uses at the time because the interview was made after they broke up with Sony and they didn’t get the IP even they wanting to.
Show your dream theory how RAD brought the IP from Sony... I’m waiting.
Last edited:
DynamiteCop!
Banned
Again, that was 5 years ago and the source you posted specifically denoted "at the time", and a lot can happen in 5 years. Sony could have sold them the IP after a period of evaluation and no interest in doing anything with it, we have no idea.
ethomaz
Banned
Last edited:
Memorabilia
Member
Yup. A lot can charge in five years.
I'd personally love to see a sequel. 1886 was great despite its flaws. Screw the haters.
ethomaz
Banned
Sony can put any developer to make the game if they want.
Last edited:
mejin
Member
is it that easy to deny facts now?
Too many rumors and speculation in the face of new systems. At this point I dont even care when everyone is crawling out of the woodwork with some bit of so called "information" then no one is credible when everyone is doing it.
Pretty much once it becomes official then I'll take notice. Until then all this stuff means to me as much as if if some bum says jesus came to him and said something to him in esperanto.
Pretty much once it becomes official then I'll take notice. Until then all this stuff means to me as much as if if some bum says jesus came to him and said something to him in esperanto.
DynamiteCop!
Banned
You don't know that, what's is your deal man?Spinning spinning spinning
Proof? You can’t because Sony owns the IP.
What fact? The only information we have is from 2015, implying as if something couldn't change in that period of 1,825 days after that article was written.
-MD-
Member
Neither will anyone else.
DynamiteCop!
Banned
ethomaz
Banned
If I have to guess that is what happened..:
- RAD made a contract with Sony to develop a game in x years.
- Due RAD inexperience they couldn’t delivery the game in the time.
- Sony allowed them to work more x months in the game.
- RAD couldn’t finish the game in that addictions time.
- Sony forced them to finish the game at date A.
- RAD delivered a demo instead a game.
- Sony and RAD broke relations.
In resume the project was too big for a company like RAD and they could only do a half-backer game that feels so incomplete that I can understand how Sony broke up with them.
Last edited:
Dr.brain64
Member
If "learn from your mistakes" is a thing then I'll definitely play the sequel.
ethomaz
Banned
They should make a remake first to make the first game a game.
What about giving the remake to Bluepoint?
Last edited:
wipeout364
Member
The game played like a industrial age gears of war if I remember correctly with lots of cut scenes and QTE events. It had a very cool setting that would be very amendable to a game, but I doubt it would be the similar ie slow moving cover based corridor shooter, the mechanics felt old when it arrived only the art direction and setting kept it from being a total failure.
GlassAwful
Member
The only way another The Order should be revealed is with a long uncut gameplay segment that shows how they learned from their mistakes and are putting more emphasis on playing the game instead of watching barely interactable cutscenes.
If Sony use this as a big reveal and it looks like more of the same with better graphics I think it will land with a dud.
If Sony use this as a big reveal and it looks like more of the same with better graphics I think it will land with a dud.
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
If you look at RAD's game history
Ports and remasters = good reviews
They do their own thing or get freedom to do a normal game = crap reviews
Oculus VR games = good reviews
Do you guys really want another 1886 game?
Ports and remasters = good reviews
They do their own thing or get freedom to do a normal game = crap reviews
Oculus VR games = good reviews
Do you guys really want another 1886 game?
DynamiteCop!
Banned
If The Order wanted to be a success it would have to adopt Gears of War pacing more or less as they both kind of target the same genre and gameplay type. It can still be heavy in dialog and cutscenes but there needs to be a lot of extended gameplay to compliment all of those story sequences.
Last edited:
Fbh
Member
That's probably part of it, yeah.
Though I think overall they just missed the point about cinematic gameplay. It's supposed to be about feeling like you are playing a movie....not watching one