Wait they gave that 3rd round to Hendricks? The fuck out of here
Condit should have won but takedowns win fights
Zero decent shots landed from 12 takedowns.
Another bullshit decision won by blanket tactics. Fuck MMA judging.
I don't know what fight GAF was watching. Hendricks won that fight plain and simply. If it was a five rounder, Condit would have won.
Condit just got fucked.
Hendricks had 6 or so heavy shots, but outside of that got outstruck on the feet (numbers will be up tonight).
Hendricks took him down, but got beat on the ground.
Hendricks only won one round.
What the hell did Condit do in the first two rounds?
What the hell did Condit do in the first two rounds?
I don't know what fight GAF was watching. Hendricks won that fight plain and simply. If it was a five rounder, Condit would have won.
Takedowns should win a fight if the takedowns lead to domination. Hendricks didn't, he took Condit down, then lost on the ground.
landed a bunch of knees and punches?
Those last 2 rounds Hendricks hit a million takedowns, but didn't do anything with them. Condit did way more damage on the ground. That's the issue.
Those last 2 rounds Hendricks hit a million takedowns, but didn't do anything with them. Condit did way more damage on the ground. That's the issue.
GSP wouldn't be able to take the same shots Carlos did tonight
GSP room: 10+ guys that look like his clones
Diaz room: One old fat guy
landed a bunch of knees and punches?
Land more shots on the feet and on the ground.
Condit still got taken down. Doesn't matter if Hendricks did nothing with it, he still put Condit on the ground. Condit lost.
People who watch enough UFC know that the fighter who gets taken down easily over and over is the guaranteed loser unless they score a knockout.
You can't win a fight if you can't stay on your feet. That pattern has held for years and should surprise nobody.
People who watch enough UFC know that the fighter who gets taken down easily over and over is the guaranteed loser unless they score a knockout.
You can't win a fight if you can't stay on your feet. That pattern has held for years and should surprise nobody.
Condit still got taken down. Doesn't matter if Hendricks did nothing with it, he still put Condit on the ground. Condit lost.
Oh ya, I forgot GSP being knocked out once in his career to a punch in the back of the head means he has a shit chin.
Even though Hendricks got way more hurt against Condit than GSP did. GSP outstruck Condit on the feet, and when he took him down, punished him. Unlike Hendricks.
Hendricks has a punchers chance, I honestly feel Diaz is way more dangerous. Better on the ground, better on the feet, just no one punch power.
People who watch enough UFC know that the fighter who gets taken down easily over and over is the guaranteed loser unless they score a knockout.
You can't win a fight if you can't stay on your feet. That pattern has held for years and should surprise nobody.
The point some of are making is that the scoring itself is an issue. What good is a takedown if no damage is done? It's simply wasting time in effect.