Guido Fawkes saying Leadsom is quitting the Tory race at noon.
WTF, people are saying on twitter that Leadsom might be quitting...
Leadsome making a statement at noon. Rumours she is going to stand down and give May the win.
Likely, she tried toss some illegal or criminal immigrants, some are failed export due Human RightBut she still wants to toss the immigrants, right?
Leadsome making a statement at noon. Rumours she is going to stand down and give May the win.
Huh, why?
Afraid of the possibility of this new centre party? (Which was apparently only happening of Leadsom won)
Theresa May is sounding like she is pitching for Labour votes.
General Election incoming next year...
Leadsom saying abuse too great?
To be an MP you need pretty thick skin. In all the interviews and statements she's seemed very naïve and green behind the ears so to speak, it's not surprising.
you know, GAF, we really are The Thick Of It Series 5
Along the economic axis perhaps. I think this was already posted either in this or the prior thread, but it was an interesting take.Because the centre right now is far closer to traditional right-wing policies than to left-wing policies.
That said, I wonder if in Tory circles they are considered Labour-lite.
https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/2012/05/09/the-equality-paradox/Perhaps the right did win the economic war and the left the culture war. We are more economically unequal but less socially unequal than we were three decades ago. But should we heap the praise, or the blame, entirely onto politicians? Much of what we have seen in Britain has occurred to varying degrees across the developed world. Inequality has risen, trade union membership has fallen, manufacturing employment has declined and welfare states have retrenched. Even the Swedes are not quite as wedded to welfarism as they once were.
At the same time, social equality, and especially the position of women and minorities, has improved in most developed countries. In Europe, it is enshrined in a series of EU directives which mean that governments couldn’t repeal discrimination laws even if they wanted to.
Global economic changes and gradual shifts in social attitudes have driven much of this change. Politicians can take some of the credit and blame but the fact that most western countries have moved in a broadly similar direction suggests that a lot of this might have happened anyway. Some, like Thatcher and Reagan, speeded up the process but in the main, politicians just acted as cheerleaders and rode the waves.
If we could transport them forward by thirty years, 1970s politicians of both left and right would probably be aghast at what they saw. The left would rail against income inequality, privatised utilities and the relatively weak trade union movement. Conservatives would splutter into their pink gins at the sight of women bosses with same-sex partners, people with brown skins at the golf club and the general ‘lack of respect’ for those in senior positions.
Could the leadership election go ahead with Gove being resurrected as May's opponent? Surely the arch-nutters backing Leadsom won't just give up?
There is an easy way for them to try.At the same time, social equality, and especially the position of women and minorities, has improved in most developed countries. In Europe, it is enshrined in a series of EU directives which mean that governments couldnt repeal discrimination laws even if they wanted to.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36763208
BBC citing "The abuse was too great" for her to continue
In the wake of the Leave campaigns shocking win in the U.K.s In/Out referendum, commentators have painstakingly defended Britains rampant Euroskepticism as part of a larger trend.
They point to the wave of discontent sweeping through the Union, from Sweden and Denmark in the north, to France, the Netherlands and Austria in the center, and Italy in the south. Influential pro-European pundits have now joined starkly anti-EU politicians such as Nigel Farage in arguing the EUs disintegration is now irreversible. Todays dominant view, it seems, is that most Europeans do not want to be ruled by Brussels.
This pessimistic diagnosis is inaccurate. Europeans are angry about how the EU has handled the asymmetric effects of globalization, but the majority do not believe that leaving the Union is the answer. The fact is that Britain or more concretely, England is an outlier in the EU in that respect.
The English have felt considerable schadenfreude over eurozone members suffering. Many in England, especially in the City, felt pride in the U.K.s sovereign decision not to join the single currency. The response from London was: We told you this was a bad idea, now deal with it.
But the fact is that the eurozone crisis, and the way it was managed, displaced the U.K. to the margins of the Union. And this did not go unnoticed. The evidence of German control over the Union dealt a huge blow to the English psyche. In part, this explains why the Leave campaigns slogan, Take back control, had such a powerful effect. England should not be made to suffer from German Chancellor Angela Merkels poor decisions on refugee policy, they argued. The solution was simple: Lets get out.
If they dont openly reject German dominance in the EU, the English still have serious reservations about it. Their belief that the rest of Europe feels the same way is a serious miscalculation.
Despite Anglo-Saxon commentators insisting the euro is a disaster and should be dismantled, an overwhelming majority, both in northern and southern parts of the eurozone, wants to keep the single currency. Why? Some say fear of the unknown has kept countries like Greece, Italy or Spain from quitting the euro. In reality, the situation is complex, and has more to do with the benefits of belonging to a stable, democratic and wealthy club whose bureaucrats are less corrupt than local politicians.
Fucking hell, anything but the return of Gove. Please God.
Two interesting things I read today:
http://www.politico.eu/article/euro...-brexit-euroskeptics-eurozone-european-union/
This is something I noticed and commented on previously in this thread. Watching BBC talk about EU is like watching an alternate reality in which EU is almost dead already. When actually the feeling and the reality outside England is a totally different one. Actually EU will most probably end up more united after Brexit.
It also feels like a strange thing to seek validation for your decision in what other countries will do when your main idea was that you will be better on your own.
https://yougov.de/news/2016/07/08/nach-der-brexit-entscheidung-deal-or-no-deal/
This is an interesting poll that I think was linked here before in regards with what kind of deal should there be between UK and EU, so I will focus only on the questions regarding Scotland:
Dark green is the ones who support Scotland to be in EU in case they get independence.
Here it would be interesting to see also the opinion of the Spanish people (not the government).
Also 72 per cent of Germans, 68 percent of French and even three out of four Britons (75 per cent) believe it is "somewhat" or "very likely" that the Scots would soon get a second referendum.
Lol, Leadsom retweeted this https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/752145161300434944 Mensch has lost her head over this and has been making up more and more bizarre lies :d
The Times Journo tries to reply/make sense of it all https://twitter.com/OliverKamm/with_replies
Is she actually insane or just one of those say the worst things for attention and a career because she was useless and wanted more money than a politician gets?
Poor Eagle, Leadsom stole her thunder lol.
I don't agree. AV was seen as a stepping stone to PR, everyone including the Lib Dems were pushing at such.
If anyone voted against AV in the hope it would lead to PR they seriously played themselves.